Rheumatoid Arthritis: Boers M

Gabriel S, Drummond M, Maetzel A, Boers M, Coyle D, Welch V, Tugwell P, Anonymous00150. · Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12672223 No free full text.

Abstract: Standardization of methods for economic evaluation is essential for defining the methodological research agenda that will advance the discipline. Standardization also greatly facilitates the interpretation and comparison of the results of economic analyses. For these reasons, several jurisdictions now require economic evaluation, conducted according to standardized methodological guidelines, as a key ingredient in decision making for reimbursement of health treatments and technologies. The application of these general guidelines, however, can be difficult in the absence of disease-specific information. In the case of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the recent emergence of innovative, highly effective, but also expensive treatments has created an immediate need to more fully understand the economic implications of RA treatments. With this background, the OMERACT Economics Working Group set out in 1994 to develop an RA-specific reference case for economic evaluation. This report summarizes the OMERACT process leading to specific recommendations on the 12 key elements of a proposed "reference case" for economic evaluation in RA. These elements include: study horizon, duration of therapy, extrapolation beyond trial duration, modeling beyond therapy, synthesis of comparisons where head-to-head trials do not exist, clinical outcome measures, mortality, valuation of health states, resource utilization, discontinuation of therapy, therapeutic sequence, and population risk stratification. Through these efforts, the OMERACT Economics Working Group aims to expedite and enhance the conduct and dissemination of methodological research in economic analyses in the rheumatic diseases.

Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Kvien T, Ahlmèn M, Boers M, Minnock P, Saag K, Shea B, Suarez Almazor M, Taal E. · University of Bristol Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12672218 No free full text.

Abstract: The objective of the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6 was to address the question of assessing the outcomes of intervention in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the perspective of those who experience the disease themselves. This was done by reviewing the current state of research in the area, identifying the requirements for the development of valid instruments, delineating a research agenda that can attain these requirements, and motivating participants to undertake the appropriate research. Through a series of meetings and discussion sessions a research agenda emerged that includes: exploring subjective experiences of RA identified by patients as important but not encompassed within the current "core set" of outcome measures (such as a sense of well being, fatigue, and disturbed sleep); clarifying terminology; and empowering patients to be more effective partners in outcomes research. These were supported by the OMERACT plenary session. Specific actions were required by both patient participants and organizers to ensure the nature of the conference, its focus and method of working were understood, and that the patient participants were sufficiently confident to make their contribution.

Boers M, van der Heijde DM. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Drugs. · Pubmed #12149042 No free full text.

Abstract: This article discusses methodological concepts and challenges underlying the interpretation of changes in plain radiographs of the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A series of consensus conferences (OMERACT [Outcome Measures in Rheumatology]) has resulted in the formulation and execution of a research agenda to harmonise reading and interpretation of films. This is important in the light of the increasing evidence that drugs can impact on the progression of joint damage. In these conferences, methodological issues have been divided according to applicability tenets summarised in the OMERACT Filter of Truth, Discrimination, and Feasibility. To pass the Filter, a measure must measure what it is supposed to measure (Truth), must discriminate between clinically relevant states (Discrimination) and be feasible in terms of costs and interpretability. 'Truth' issues include the choice of joints, the view and other technical specifications of the radiograph, such as which abnormalities to score, the level of aggregation of the information, culminating in the choice of the scoring system. 'Discrimination' issues include reproducibility and sensitivity to change. The current research agenda includes items such as defining a criterion for 'no relevant progression', comparison between time ordered and randomly ordered reading, further comparison of methods and subscores, and methodology around missing values.

Boers M. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Springer Semin Immunopathol. · Pubmed #11455857 No free full text.

Abstract: Even with the limited number of antirheumatic agents available, theoretical considerations lead to an almost infinite number of combination strategies. This article outlines possible strategies based on the primary choice between maximization of efficacy or minimization of toxicity. Strategies are illustrated with examples from trial experience in the field of rheumatoid arthritis.

Boers M. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Rheum Dis Clin North Am. · Pubmed #11396100 No free full text.

Abstract: Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is changing with the rapid increase of information on the efficacy of old and new antirheumatic agents. This article provides an opinionated review of the data currently available and makes a case for rapid and aggressive treatment of all patients with RA as early as possible. In the future, corticosteroids will be an important component of such treatment strategies.

Strand V, Lassere M, van der Heijde D, Johnson K, Boers M. · Division of Immunology, Stanford University, San Francisco, CA 94028, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11327271 No free full text.

Abstract: Recent randomized controlled trials of traditional and newly developed therapies provide evidence that we have interventions that potentially slow or prevent structural damage in active rheumatoid arthritis, as measured using radiography. These trials also provide a unique opportunity for exploratory data analysis to generate hypotheses apropos the pathogenesis and determinants of radiographic progression and functional disability; they also facilitate further study of the methodological issues regarding imaging measurement.

van Dieten HE, Korthals-de Bos IB, van Tulder MW, Lems WF, Dijkmans BA, Boers M. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit, Van de Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11005773 links to  free full text

Abstract: A systematic review on the cost effectiveness of prophylactic treatments of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) induced gastropathy in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis was conducted. Two reviewers conducted the literature search and the review. Both full and partial economic evaluations published in English, Dutch, or German were included. The criteria list published in the textbook of Drummond was used to determine the quality of the economic evaluations. The methodological quality of three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which the economic evaluations obtained probability estimates of NSAID induced gastropathy and adverse events was assessed by a list of internal validity criteria. The conclusions were based on a rating system consisting of four levels of evidence. Ten economic evaluations were included; three were based on RCTs. All evaluations studied misoprostol as prophylactic treatment: in one evaluation misoprostol was studied as a fixed component in a combination with diclofenac (Arthrotec). All economic evaluations comprised analytical studies containing a decision tree. The three trials were of high methodological quality. Nine economic evaluations were considered high quality and one economic evaluation was considered of low methodological quality. There is strong evidence (level "A") that the use of misoprostol for the prevention of NSAID induced gastropathy is cost effective, and limited evidence (level "C") that the use of Arthrotec is cost effective. Although the levels of evidence used in this review are arbitrary, it is believed that a qualitative analysis is useful: quantitative analyses in this field are hampered by the heterogeneity of economic evaluations. Existing criteria to evaluate the methodological quality of economic evaluations may need refinement for use in systematic reviews.

Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Knipschild PG. · Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #10796385 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Balneotherapy (hydrotherapy or spa therapy) for patients with arthritis is one of the oldest forms of therapy. One of the aims of balneotherapy is to soothe the pain and as a consequence to relieve patients' suffering and make them feel well. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review to assess the effects of balneotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Using the Cochrane search strategy, studies were found by screening: 1) The Medline CD-ROM database from 1966 to June 1999 and 2) the database from the Cochrane Field 'Rehabilitation and Related Therapies', which contains also studies published in journals not covered by Medline. Also, 3) reference checking and 4) personal communications with authors was carried out to retrieve eligible studies. To perform an adequate assessment of the methodological quality the languages of the publications had to be: Dutch, English, French or German. Date of the most recent literature search: June, 1999 SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing balneotherapy with any intervention or with no intervention. Patients included had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) or some other form of arthritis. Trials incorporating patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the American Rheumatism Association Criteria (ARA) (Ropes 1958) (these criteria have changed over time) or by the criteria of Steinbrocker (1949) were regarded as a separate group. At least one of the WHO/ILAR core set of endpoints for RA clinical trials had to be the main outcome measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A criteria list used to assess the methodological quality was the one developed at the Department of Epidemiology at the Maastricht University, called "the Maastricht list". The quality scores and data abstraction of the studies were carried out independently by two reviewers (HdV, RdB). Disagreements were solved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials with 607 patients were included in this review. Most trials reported positive findings, but were methodologically flawed to some extent. A 'quality of life' outcome was reported by two trials. Just one of the randomized trials mentioned an intention-to-treat analysis and only three performed a comparison of effects between groups. Pooling of the data was not performed, because of heterogeneity of the studies, multiple outcome measurements, and, apart from two studies, the overall data presentation was too scarce to enable pooling of the data. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: One cannot ignore the positive findings reported in most trials. However the scientific evidence is weak because of the poor methodological quality, the absence of an adequate statistical analysis, and the absence, for the patient, of most essential outcome measures (pain, quality of life), Therefore, the noted "positive findings" should be viewed with caution. Because of the methodological flaws an answer about the efficacy of balneotherapy cannot be provided at this time. Flaws found in the reviewed studies could be avoided in future trials.

Möttönen TT, Hannonen PJ, Boers M. · Department of Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10589359 No free full text.

Abstract: A number of reports indicating the growing acceptance of simultaneous therapy with multiple disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), as well as the use of more aggressive treatment measures in the early phases of disease to combat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have appeared during the last decade. However, only a few randomized controlled clinical trials have been conducted on the use of DMARD combinations in early RA. We review these trials in this article. In two separate one-year studies combination therapy with sulphasalazine (SSZ) and methotrexate (MTX) seemed to offer no benefits compared to either drug used as monotherapy. On the other hand, the DMARD combinations so far proven to be superior to single DMARDs have initially also included a corticosteroid component. In the COBRA study (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis) the combination of SSZ (2 gm/day), MTX (7.5 mg/week for 40 weeks), and prednisolone (Prd) (initially 60 mg/day, tapered in 6 weekly steps to 7.5 mg/day and stopped after 28 weeks) compared to SSZ alone (2 gm/day) resulted in significantly better clinical outcomes at week 28. Although the difference in clinical response between the treatment arms was lost at week 58, the progression of joint damage remained statistically significantly slower at week 80 in the patients initially assigned to the combination therapy. Furthermore, in the FIN-RACo trial (Finnish Rheumatoid Arthritis Combination Therapy Trial), therapy using a "tailored-steps" strategy with SSZ (1-2 gm/day), MTX (7.5-1.5 mg/week), hydroxychloroquine (300 mg/day), and Prd (up to 10 mg/day) yielded a significantly increased remission rate and less peripheral joint damage at two years than the single DMARD treatment strategy (initially SSZ 2 gm/day), with or without Prd. Adverse effects in both study arms were comparable. Two additional preliminary reports (in abstract form) suggest that intensive local therapy in the form of intra-articular injections added to single or combination therapy improves both local and systemic disease control, with increased remissions and less damage. Although still preliminary, these results should encourage the rheumatological community to treat selected RA patients with DMARD combinations from the very start.

van der Heijde D, Boers M, Lassere M. · Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10090191 No free full text.

Abstract: Radiographs are important endpoints in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several scoring methods exist. However, many methodological issues are unsolved and require more attention. The following issues will be addressed: the abnormalities that should be scored; joints that should be included in a scoring method; whether both right and left hands and feet should be scored; views that should be used; the order in which radiographs should be scored; how data should be evaluated; how intra/interobserver variation and sensitivity to change should be assessed; the optimum number of readers to assess radiographs; the score to be used if there are multiple readers; quality assurance, international training, a validation set of radiographs, and automated scoring of radiographs.

Ortiz Z, Shea B, Garcia Dieguez M, Boers M, Tugwell P, Boonen A, Wells G. · Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Argentina. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #9918266 No free full text.

Abstract: To review the available evidence that has used generic instruments alone or in comparison with disease specific instruments. A systematic review was carried out using the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. We used MEDLINE and EMBASE searches and we performed a hand search of the abstracts listed under "quality of life" at American College of Rheumatology (ACR) meetings. Selection was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCT) using generic instruments in populations older than 18 years with any of the following diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and ankylosing spondylitis. Language was restricted to English papers. Studies using only disease-specific instruments were excluded. From 488 articles retrieved, 13 reports of 10 randomized controlled trials were selected. There were 101 abstracts on quality of life in ACR abstract books; 78 abstracts contained data on generic instruments, and of these, 9 described their use in RCT. Despite a substantial increase in the number of papers and abstracts addressing different aspects of generic questionnaires, the majority of the papers were descriptive. The evidence is not yet available to document that any of the generic instruments pass the requirements of the OMERACT Filter.

van Tuyl LH, Lems WF, Voskuyl AE, Kerstens PJ, Garnero P, Dijkmans BA, Boers M. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18625629 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of an intensive combination treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) combined with monitoring both disease activity and cartilage degradation. METHODS: In a pilot trial, 21 patients with active early RA (mean DAS28 5.3; mean disease duration 3 months) were treated with COBRA treatment comprising sulfasalazine, methotrexate and high-dose step-down prednisolone, intensified by adding hydroxychloroquine and continued low-dose prednisolone. In addition, based on measurements of disease activity or a marker of cartilage degradation (CTX-II), treatment adjustments were possible with methotrexate intensification after 8 or 21 weeks; and with infliximab after 21 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen of 21 patients (90%) were in remission (DAS28 <2.6) after 40 weeks (8 weeks, 57%; 21 weeks, 76%). American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, ACR20, 50, 70 and 90 improvements rates were 100%, 95%, 71% and 43% respectively. CTX-II excretion decreased by mean (SD) 347(292) ng/mmol creatinine, but only 50% of patients reduced their CTX-II excretion below the cut-off point. The two monitoring groups showed no significant difference in remission according to DAS score or CTX-II excretion, despite a trend towards more intensive treatment in the CTX-II group. Treatment intensification was feasible according to protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This small pilot study suggests that intensified and tightly controlled COBRA treatment is uniquely effective in early RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN96372677.

van Rossum MA, Boers M, Zwinderman AH, van Soesbergen RM, Wieringa H, Fiselier TJ, Franssen MJ, ten Cate R, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Wulffraat NM, van Luijk WH, Oostveen JC, Kuis W, Dijkmans BA, Anonymous00047. · Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Pediatric Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16142707 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of a newly developed radiologic assessment tool, the Dijkstra score, and to develop a numeric composite score and progressor classification scheme to apply in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) trials. METHODS: A placebo-controlled trial of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in patients with oligoarticular- and polyarticular-onset JIA yielded the data for this study. Data were obtained from 418 sets of radiographs of the clinically involved and contralateral joints (at study entry and at 6 months' followup) from 66 JIA patients. The Dijkstra score assesses the presence or absence of swelling, osteopenia, joint space narrowing, growth abnormalities, subchondral bone cysts, erosions, and malalignment. These signs were combined in the Dijkstra composite score, to assess inflammation (DI), growth (DG), and damage (DD). Progression was defined as an increase in either the DG or the DD score. Scores were evaluated among all radiographs, a standard set of films (hand, foot, and knee), and per patient. All scores were used to explore differences between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Over time, 58% of joints remained normal, 23% remained abnormal but stable, 14% showed an increase in signs, and 5% showed a decrease in signs. Of the 66 JIA patients, 12% had normal radiographic findings throughout followup, 27% showed abnormalities at some sites without change, and 61% showed change in at least 1 site. Changes in the DI, DG, and DD scores varied considerably per type of joint and occurred most frequently in joints of the standard set. DI and DG scores changed most often in the knees, while DD scores changed primarily in the hands and feet. The disease course in 8% of joints was classified as progressive. Films of SSZ-treated patients, versus the placebo group, showed less deterioration by the DD scores (P = 0.04), and the disease course was more often classified as nonprogressive in the SSZ group (P = 0.037). When progressors were defined as those who had at least one radiograph showing progression, significantly more placebo-treated patients were considered progressors (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In this trial data set, the Dijkstra composite score and the resulting progressor classification system are comprehensive and feasible tools that are sensitive to change and discriminate between clinical situations. They should now be tested by other investigators and in other data sets.

Korthals-de Bos I, Van Tulder M, Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Adèr HJ, Bibo J, Boonen A, Van Der Linden S. · Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15338488 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of indirect costs for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) within the COBRA trial (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis) on the cost-effectiveness of both therapies. Analyses of the efficacy and direct costs of the treatments have already been reported. METHODS: Patients with early RA selected for the 56-week trial were randomly assigned to prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine (the COBRA combination) (n = 76, tapered after 28 weeks) or to sulfasalazine (SSZ; n = 79, of which 78 patients were evaluable) alone. The main efficacy outcomes were a pooled index and radiographic damage score in hands and feet, and utilities. Direct and indirect costs were measured (from a societal perspective) by means of cost diaries and interviews completed by patients during the intervention phase and the followup phase, each lasting 28 weeks. Differences in mean costs between groups and cost-utility ratios were evaluated by applying nonparametric bootstrapping techniques. RESULTS: In the first 28 weeks, indirect costs per patient totaled US $2,578 and US $3,638 for COBRA and SSZ therapy, respectively (p = 0.09). The total costs were $5,931 and $7,853, respectively (p < 0.05). These differences were lost in the second 28 weeks. For the total period the mean total costs per patient were $10,262 and $12,788, respectively (p = 0.11). Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of the data. The point estimate of the cost per quality-adjusted life-year based on the rating scale was negative at $-385, suggesting dominance of COBRA (more effect at lower cost). CONCLUSION: COBRA therapy adds additional disease control (improvements in disease activity, physical function, and rate of damage progression) at lower or equal cost compared to SSZ in early RA.

Landewé R, Geusens P, Boers M, van der Heijde D, Lems W, te Koppele J, van der Linden S, Garnero P. · Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15146408 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a randomized clinical trial setting with an aggressive combination-therapy arm and a mild-monotherapy arm, whether therapy-induced changes in urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and type II collagen (CTX-II) predict 5-year radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients had participated in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) trial comparing aggressive step-down combination therapy (the COBRA regimen, including temporary high-dose prednisolone, temporary low-dose methotrexate, and sulfasalazine [SSZ]) and mild monotherapy (SSZ). Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. Radiographs were scored according to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method (mean of 2 independent readers who were aware of the sequence). Individual long-term radiographic progression was estimated, using baseline radiographs and all radiographs obtained during the followup period, by simple linear regression analysis (curve fitting). RESULTS: Both COBRA therapy and SSZ monotherapy produced a significant decrease in urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels at 3 months, and this decrease was amplified at 6 months. COBRA therapy suppressed CTX-II (change from baseline levels -36% and -43% at 3 and 6 months, respectively), but not CTX-I, significantly better than did SSZ (-17% and -21% at 3 and 6 months, respectively) at 3 and 6 months. The magnitude of the decrease in urinary CTX-II levels at 3 months significantly predicted long-term (5-year) radiographic progression (beta = 0.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.13, 0.83]). This effect was independent of the change in disease activity and inflammation indices at 3 months. Patients whose CTX-II levels were normalized (<150 ng/mmoles of urinary creatinine) at 3 months had a significantly higher chance of radiographic stability (no progression over 5 years) than did patients whose CTX-II levels were increased both at baseline and at 3 months (odds ratio 4.5 [95% CI 1.5, 13]). CONCLUSION: The individual CTX-II response measured after 3 months of therapy in patients with active RA who had increased CTX-II levels at baseline independently predicts long-term radiographic progression. Urinary CTX-II levels may be used as early markers of treatment efficacy in patients with RA.

van Rossum MA, Zwinderman AH, Boers M, Dijkmans BA, van Soesbergen RM, Fiselier TJ, Franssen MJ, ten Cate R, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, Wulffraat NM, Kuis W, van Luijk WH, Oostveen JC, Dijkstra PF, Anonymous00362. · Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12571861 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe radiologic features of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in a standardized manner, to test the reliability and feasibility of this description, and to correlate these features with clinical signs as a first step in the development of a standardized assessment method. METHODS: The placebo-controlled study of sulfasalazine in patients with oligoarticular, extended oligoarticular, and polyarticular JIA performed by the Dutch Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Study Group yielded the data for this study. All trial entry radiographs (clinically involved joints and contralateral joints) were scored (in consensus by a skeletal radiologist and pediatric rheumatologist) for the presence of swelling, osteopenia, joint space narrowing, growth abnormalities, subchondral bone cysts, erosions, and malalignment. RESULTS: Data on 67 of 69 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 9.1 years (range 2.5-17.6 years), and the median disease duration was 24 months (range 5-176 months). Thirteen percent of the patients were IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) positive, and 16% were HLA-B27 positive. All 68 clinically evaluated joints were included in the maximum of 19 radiographed joints (or joint groups) per patient. The mean number of radiographed joints per patient was 7 (range 2-15); knees, hands, ankles, and feet were most frequently affected. Fifty-eight patients (87%) had radiologic abnormalities in at least one joint (soft-tissue swelling in 63% of patients, growth disturbances in 48%, joint space narrowing in 28%, and erosions in 15%). In total, half of the radiographs of the clinically involved joints showed radiologic abnormalities, including two-thirds of the radiographs of the clinically affected hands and knees. Univariate analysis revealed a good correlation between the overall articular (clinical) severity and the presence of radiologic abnormalities (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed increased ORs for the presence of radiologic abnormalities and IgM-RF positivity (OR 4.6, P = 0.005) or HLA-B27 positivity (OR 3.0, P = 0.004). In general, reproducibility of the radiologic scoring method was good (mean kappa coefficient of 0.74 [range 0.40-0.86]), although there were scoring discrepancies for swelling, osteopenia, and growth disturbances. The scoring took 10-20 minutes per patient. CONCLUSION: Our model of describing and scoring radiologic abnormalities of radiographed joints in JIA was feasible, mostly reproducible, correlated well with the overall articular severity score, and added substantial new information not available on clinical examination.

Garnero P, Landewé R, Boers M, Verhoeven A, Van Der Linden S, Christgau S, Van Der Heijde D, Boonen A, Geusens P. · INSERM Research Unit 403, and Synarc, Lyon, France. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12428224 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The known risk factors for radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not optimally discriminative in patients with early disease who do not have evidence of radiologic damage. We sought to determine whether urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II) collagen (markers of bone and cartilage destruction, respectively) are associated with long-term radiologic progression in patients with early RA. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 110 patients with early RA who were participating in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) clinical trial and followup study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral pulse prednisolone, methotrexate, plus sulfasalazine with sulfasalazine alone. We investigated the relationship between baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II and the mean annual progression of joint destruction over a median of 4 years, as measured by changes in the modified Sharp score (average of 2 independent readers). RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels in the highest tertile were the strongest predictors of radiologic progression (Sharp score increase >2 units/year; odds ratio 7.9 and 11.2, respectively), independently of treatment group, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, rheumatoid factor (RF), and baseline joint damage (Sharp score). The likelihood ratios for a positive test were 3.8 and 8.0 for CTX-I and CTX-II, respectively, which compared favorably with the likelihood ratios for the ESR (3.0), baseline joint damage (1.6), and RF (1.8). When patients were grouped according to the presence (Sharp score >/=4, n = 49) and absence (Sharp score <4, n = 61) of joint damage at baseline, CTX-I and CTX-II levels were predictive only in those without baseline joint damage (odds ratio 14.9 and 25.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: High baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II independently predict an increased risk of radiologic progression over 4 years in patients with early RA, especially those without radiologic joint damage. Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II may be useful for identifying individual RA patients at high risk of progression very early in the disease, before erosions can be detected radiographically. Such patients may be in special need of treatments that inhibit bone and cartilage degradation.

Bruynesteyn K, Van Der Heijde D, Boers M, Verhoeven A, Boonen A, Van Der Linden S, Anonymous00326. · University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12382303 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the context of a drug trial, prevention of erosions in undamaged joints is often considered more important than prevention of progression in already damaged joints, although a clear rationale is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relative contribution of separate components of the erosion score of the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method in early RA. METHODS: Different aspects of erosive damage were evaluated by their ability to discriminate between the 2 treatments in an early RA trial (the COBRA trial). RESULTS: The contribution of progression of already eroded joints to the total erosion score clearly increased during the 1.5 years of the trial. When the periods 0-28, 28-56, and 56-80 weeks were analyzed separately, the erosion score showed a significant difference between the groups in the first 2 periods (P < 0.0001, P < 0.03, and P < 0.64, respectively). Similar differences were seen in rates of progression in previously eroded joints (P = 0.005, P = 0.003, P = 0.35). On the other hand, rates of progression in newly eroded joints showed no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in the second and third period (P < 0.0001, P < 0.16, P < 0.87). Analyses on joint and patient level showed analogous results. CONCLUSION: Subanalyses on progression rates in noneroded joints and already eroded joints can provide additional information. However, important information and discriminative strength may be lost when assessment is limited to the development of erosions in undamaged joints.

Knijff-Dutmer E, Drossaers-Bakker W, Verhoeven A, van der Sluijs Veer G, Boers M, van der Linden S, van de Laar M. · Rheumatology Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #12079900 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine whether rheumatoid factors (RFs), measured as continuous variables by time resolved fluoroimmunoassay, reflect disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Further, to study the association of RFs and other disease activity parameters with radiological joint damage, especially in individual patients. METHODS: In active, early RA, IgM and IgA RFs, as well as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), tender joint score, and swollen joint score were assessed regularly. At the study start and at 56 and 80 weeks, radiographs of hands and feet were assessed by the Sharp score (van der Heijde modification). Associations between RFs and disease activity parameters were studied. In addition, associations between radiographic damage and disease activity parameters (baseline and time integrated) were analysed by non-parametric tests and multiple regression analysis. The relation between time integrated disease activity parameters and radiological damage in individual patients was analysed and visualised. RESULTS: 155 patients were included. RF levels were strongly associated with the disease activity parameters (especially ESR and CRP) and with each other. All disease activity parameters, at baseline as well as time integrated parameters, were associated with (the progression of) radiographic damage. Moreover, in individual patients, a linear relationship between time integrated disease activity parameters and progression of radiological damage was seen. CONCLUSION: RFs, measured as continuous variables, can be considered as disease activity parameters in patients with RA. The level of RF at baseline and the exposure to RF over time is associated with radiological damage. In individual patients, there is a constant relation between disease activity and radiological damage.

Lard LR, Boers M, Verhoeven A, Vos K, Visser H, Hazes JM, Zwinderman AH, Schreuder GM, Breedveld FC, De Vries RR, van der Linden S, Zanelli E, Huizinga TW. · Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11953965 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The presence of certain HLA class II antigens is strongly associated with the progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Such antigens may be more effective than other class II antigens in inducing the formation of autoreactive T cells after presentation of (auto)antigens. We investigated whether early and aggressive treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs could modify this relationship. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 studies of patients with early RA treated according to different strategies. The first study consisted of 2 cohorts, one (n = 109; median disease duration before treatment 4 months) was treated according to the pyramid strategy (initial nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, followed by chloroquine [CQ] or sulfasalazine [SSZ] when necessary), and the other (n = 97; median disease duration before treatment 2 weeks) was immediately treated with CQ or SSZ. The second study comprised 155 patients (median disease duration 4 months) from the Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis (COBRA) trial, in which patients were randomly assigned to combination treatment with step-down prednisolone, methotrexate (MTX), and SSZ (n = 76) or with SSZ alone (n = 79). Prednisolone and MTX dosages were tapered and stopped after 28 and 40 weeks, respectively. The extent of joint damage was measured by the modified Sharp method. RESULTS: In the pyramid treatment cohort, the median increase in Sharp score after 2 years was 12 in patients positive for the shared epitope (SE) and 1 in SE- patients. In the immediate treatment cohort, the median increase was 3 in SE+ patients and 2 in SE- patients. In the SSZ group of the COBRA study, the median increase in Sharp score after 1 year was 11 in DR4+ patients and 3 in DR4- patients. In the combination treatment group, the median increase was 4 in DR4+ patients and 2 in DR4- patients. Significance was confirmed by multiple regression using log-transformed scores. CONCLUSION: Early and aggressive antirheumatic drug treatment affects the association of HLA class II alleles with progression of joint damage in RA.

Landewé RB, Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Westhovens R, van de Laar MA, Markusse HM, van Denderen JC, Westedt ML, Peeters AJ, Dijkmans BA, Jacobs P, Boonen A, van der Heijde DM, van der Linden S. · Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, PO Box 5800, University Hospital Maastricht, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11840436 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis (COBRA) trial demonstrated that step-down combination therapy with prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine (SSZ) was superior to SSZ monotherapy for suppressing disease activity and radiologic progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The current study was conducted to investigate whether the benefits of COBRA therapy were sustained over time, and to determine which baseline factors could predict outcome. METHODS: All patients had participated in the 56-week COBRA trial. During followup, they were seen by their own rheumatologists and were also assessed regularly by study nurses; no treatment protocol was specified. Disease activity, radiologic damage, and functional ability were the primary outcome domains. Two independent assessors scored radiographs in sequence according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. Outcomes were analyzed by generalized estimating equations on the basis of intent-to-treat, starting with data obtained at the last visit of the COBRA trial (56 weeks after baseline). RESULTS: At the beginning of followup, patients in the COBRA group had a significantly lower mean time-averaged 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and a significantly lower median radiologic damage (Sharp) score compared with those in the SSZ monotherapy group. The functional ability score (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]) was similar in both groups. During the 4-5 year followup period, the time-averaged DAS28 decreased 0.17 points per year in the SSZ group and 0.07 in the COBRA group. The Sharp progression rate was 8.6 points per year in the SSZ group and 5.6 in the COBRA group. After adjustment for differences in treatment and disease activity during followup, the between-group difference in the rate of radiologic progression was 3.7 points per year. The HAQ score did not change significantly over time. Independent baseline predictors of radiologic progression over time (apart from treatment allocation) were rheumatoid factor positivity, Sharp score, and DAS28. CONCLUSION: An initial 6-month cycle of intensive combination treatment that includes high-dose corticosteroids results in sustained suppression of the rate of radiologic progression in patients with early RA, independent of subsequent antirheumatic therapy.

Verhoeven AC, Boers M, te Koppele JM, van der Laan WH, Markusse HM, Geusens P, van der Linden S. · Internal Medicine/Rheumatology Department, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #11709606 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Exploration of bone metabolism changes at different levels of disease activity, both with and without oral corticosteroid therapy, and prediction of changes in joint damage and bone density from the observed changes in markers of bone turnover. METHODS: Data analysis from a randomized clinical trial with 155 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients; median age 50 yr, early and active disease (diagnosis < 2 yr); one group treated with a combination of sulphasalazine (SSZ; 2000 mg/day), methotrexate (MTX; 7.5 mg/week) and prednisolone (initially 60 mg/day, tapered in six weekly steps to 7.5 mg/day), the other group with SSZ alone. Prednisolone and MTX were tapered and stopped after weeks 28 and 40, respectively, while SSZ was continued. Urine and serum samples were collected at baseline and weeks 16, 28, 40 and 56. Measurements of urinary pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD) and serum alkaline phosphatase (tAP) and osteocalcin (OC) were performed, as well as standard clinimetry and bone densitometry. RESULTS: Over time and in both treatment groups, bone formation and bone resorption markers showed a pattern similar to erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): a significant decrease compared with baseline and a larger decrease with combined treatment at weeks 16 and 28. PYD excretion, tAP, OC, and joint damage scores were significantly lower in the combined treatment group. Changes in bone density (of spine and hips) did not significantly differ between treatment groups. Mainly cumulative ESR explained progression of joint damage. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy in patients with early and active RA are both independently associated with decreased levels of urinary excretion of bone collagen resorption markers PYD and DPD. Markers of bone formation and resorption closely followed changes in ESR in both treatment groups. Reduced bone resorption together with reduced bone formation-initially at a somewhat faster pace-resulted in less bone turnover and explain the observed (non-significant and partially reversible) extra bone loss in the lumbar spine associated with prednisolone (combined treatment).

Boers M, Kostense PJ, Verhoeven AC, van der Linden S, Anonymous00375. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Free University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11665964 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE; Several factors predict joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the context of a trial in early RA, we studied the relationship between clinical signs in individual joints and their propensity to develop progressive damage. METHODS: The COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis) multicenter trial compared the efficacy of prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine against sulfasalazine alone in 155 patients with early RA. Two blinded observers interpreted radiographs in sequence (using the Sharp/Van der Heijde scoring system); in each center, one blinded observer performed clinical assessments every 3 months. The current analysis is based on clinical and radiologic data of the individual metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of 135 patients. Conditional stepwise logistic regression analyzed the relationship between damage (progression) and clinical signs at baseline and followup for each of these joints individually in each patient. RESULTS: Combination therapy strongly retarded the progression of damage. Progression was stronger in patients with rheumatoid factor, HLA-DR4, and high levels of disease activity at baseline. At baseline, 6% of the MCP and PIP joints showed damage; after 1 year, disease had progressed in 10% of these joints. Baseline damage, swelling, or pain in a joint independently and strongly predicted the progression of damage in that joint (P < 0.001). Each additional point in the swelling score (range 0-2) tripled the risk for subsequent progression. Each additional point on the Sharp scale (range 0-8 per joint) and each additional point on the pain scale (range 0-3) doubled the risk. The mean pain and swelling scores over the year were even stronger predictors of damage. CONCLUSION: Local expression of early RA disease activity, both at baseline and at 1-year followup, is strongly related to progression of damage in the individual joint.

Boers M, Verhoeven AC, van der Linden S. · Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11352236 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Change in a patient's condition is expressed as a percentage of the baseline value for a core set of measures in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and this is used as the basis to decide whether a patient has improved. The result is dependent on whether the underlying measure has a score that increases or decreases on improvement. We examined the importance of this effect in the application of the ACR improvement criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from the COBRA trial, in which 155 patients with early active RA had been randomized to receive either combination treatment with step-down prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine or sulfasalazine alone. Patient and physician global assessments were recoded to reflect decreasing scores on improvement. The effects of this difference in scoring systems were compared among 3 response criteria levels (20%, 50%, and 70%) that are currently being used to assess improvement in RA clinical trials. RESULTS: Analyses showed that the effects of a decreasing, versus increasing, score on the designation of improvement cannot be ignored, especially at higher percentages of improvement (e.g., 50%, 70%). CONCLUSION: We recommend that percentage improvement in RA be calculated only on scores that decrease on improvement. When necessary, raw data should be recoded before the ACR improvement criteria are applied.

Verhoeven AC, Boers M, van der Liden S. · Department of Rheumatology/Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11128667 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The McMaster Toronto Arthritis patient preference questionnaire (MACTAR) is a functional index that measures change in impaired activities selected by each patient in a baseline interview, and change in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. In addition, it contains questions on the state of physical, social and emotional function and overall health, and their relation to RA. We evaluated MACTAR's feasibility and validity (content validity, construct validity, and responsiveness). METHODS: A randomized trial of combined treatment in 155 patients with early RA; patients' mean age at baseline was 50 years and median disease duration since diagnosis was 4 months. RESULTS: Feasibility: MACTAR requires trained interviewers. In the trial, interviews took about 15 min. In longer term followup, activities selected at baseline may become less relevant as the pattern of disability changes. Followup from 153 patients (99%) was available. At least 5 impaired activities were identified and ranked by 147 patients (95%); interviewers could follow 99% of these. The scoring system proved complex and required amendments. Content validity: Although its main focus is physical function, the MACTAR also contains generic questions; 75% of the patients named at least one impaired activity from the category "mobility." Only 48% were covered by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) items. Construct validity: MACTAR scores correlate highly with other functional indices and with measures of disease activity. Responsiveness: At 16 weeks the standardized response mean for the total MACTAR score in the combined-treatment group was excellent, at 2.2. Items that directly address change were even more responsive. CONCLUSION: The MACTAR interview is a valid and highly responsive instrument to assess change in functional ability of patients with early RA with active disease. It provides insight into problems--mainly of physical function--that really matter to patients. For standard clinical trials and clinical care, feasibility of the MACTAR is limited and the simpler HAQ remains the instrument of choice.