Rheumatoid Arthritis: Benhamou M

Benhamou M, Rincheval N, Roy C, Foltz V, Rozenberg S, Sibilia J, Schaeverbeke T, Bourgeois P, Ravaud P, Fautrel B. · Department of Rheumatology, University of Paris VI, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19286850 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare rheumatologists' prescription for first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-life settings with 2 clinical practice guidelines (CPG), the French Society of Rheumatology/STPR 2004 and EULAR/ESCISIT 2007, and thus assess the gap between practices and guidelines. Method. ESPOIR was a French multicenter cohort study of 813 patients with early arthritis between 2002 and 2005. "Definite" and "probable" RA were defined according to ACR criteria and the level of diagnostic certainty. The objectives were to assess conformity between the observed first-line DMARD prescribed for those patients and the DMARD recommended in the guidelines; and to conduct a mail survey of patients' usual rheumatologists to investigate the reasons for their nonconformity with guidelines. RESULTS: In total 627 patients with definite or probable RA were identified. Conformity rates were 58% for STPR guidelines and 54% for EULAR guidelines. At 6 months, 83 (34%) patients with early RA did not receive any DMARD. Main determinants associated with conformity to guidelines were disease activity and presence of severity-predictive factors. The main reason leading to a discrepancy between guidelines and daily practice appeared to be diagnostic uncertainty, i.e., the difficulty to reliably assess RA diagnosis as early as the first visits to the rheumatologist. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial gap between CPG and rheumatologists' daily practice concerning the first DMARD to prescribe in early RA. This is explained mainly by diagnostic uncertainty. More attention should be paid in future guidelines to the diagnostic difficulties of early RA.

Kantari C, Pederzoli-Ribeil M, Amir-Moazami O, Gausson-Dorey V, Moura IC, Lecomte MC, Benhamou M, Witko-Sarsat V. · Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U845, Paris, France · Blood. · Pubmed #17712045 links to  free full text

Abstract: Proteinase 3 (PR3), a serine proteinase contained in neutrophil azurophilic granules, is considered a risk factor for vasculitides and rheumatoid arthritis when expressed on the outer leaflet of neutrophil plasma membrane and is the preferred target of antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies (ANCA) in Wegener granulomatosis. ANCA binding to PR3 expressed at the surface of neutrophils activates them. Evidence is provided that neutrophil apoptosis induced significantly more membrane PR3 expression without degranulation (but no enhanced membrane CD35, CD66b, CD63, myeloperoxidase, or elastase expression). This observation was confirmed on cytoplasts, a model of granule-free neutrophils. We hypothesized that PR3 could interact with proteins involved in membrane flip-flop (eg, phospholipid scramblase 1 [PLSCR1]). PR3-PLSCR1 interaction in neutrophils was demonstrated by confocal microscopy and coimmunoprecipitation. In the RBL-2H3 rat mast-cell line stably transfected with PR3 or its inactive mutant (PR3S203A), PR3 externalization depended on PLSCR1, as shown by less PR3 externalization in the presence of rPLSCR1 siRNA, but independently of its serine-proteinase activity. Finally, apoptosis-externalized PR3 decreased the human macrophage-phagocytosis rate of apoptotic PR3 transfectants. Therefore, in addition to ANCA binding in vasculitis, the proinflammatory role of membrane PR3 expression may involve interference with macrophage clearance of apoptotic neutrophils.

Fautrel B, Benhamou M. · Service de rhumatologie, groupe hospitalier de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, université Paris-VI-Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. · Gynecol Obstet Fertil. · Pubmed #17707673 No free full text.

Abstract: The desire of reproduction is a true challenge for the physicians in charge of patients with chronic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis or other connective tissue diseases. It requires: 1) the strict evaluation of the potential risks of flare of the rheumatic disease because of the pregnancy; 2) the assessment of risks on pregnancy outcome and fetus development; 3) the management of the different anti-rheumatic agents in order to maintain optimal control of disease activity and avoid any teratogenic problem. Besides this, it clearly appears that inflammatory rheumatic diseases may have an impact on patients' fertility, which may be explained by different mechanisms, physical, psychological, hormonal or immunological. Moreover, some treatments may directly affect fertility, which may justify specific managements in order to preserve gonadic functions.