Rheumatoid Arthritis: Baillet A

Gaudin P, Leguen-Guegan S, Allenet B, Baillet A, Grange L, Juvin R. · Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Sud, Teaching Hospital, BP 338, 38434 Echirolles cedex, France. · Joint Bone Spine. · Pubmed #17913551 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Dynamic exercise therapy as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine for healthy individuals is of unclear relevance to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). No recommendations on this issue are available. Few studies have evaluated the optimal program, frequency, or target population; furthermore, there is no consensus about the best assessment tools for monitoring clinical, functional, and structural parameters during dynamic exercise therapy in patients with RA. METHODS: We conducted an extensive review of the literature published between 1964 and 2005. We identified nine randomized controlled studies that provided a high level of proof regarding the effects of dynamic exercise therapy in RA patients older than 18 years of age. RESULTS: Dynamic exercise programs improve aerobic capacity and muscle strength in patients with RA. Their effects on functional capacity are unclear, and many sources of bias influenced the study results. The clinical and laboratory safety profiles were good. The structural impact of dynamic exercise remains to be determined.

Baillet A, Payraud E, Niderprim VA, Nissen MJ, Allenet B, François P, Grange L, Casez P, Juvin R, Gaudin P. · 1Clinic of Rheumatology, Hôpital Sud, Echirolles, Hôpital A Michallon, Grenoble, France. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19211654 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional, clinical, radiological and quality of life outcomes of a 4-week dynamic exercise programme (DEP) in RA. METHODS: Patients matched on the principal medico-social parameters were randomly assigned to either the DEP or the conventional joint rehabilitation group. Primary end point for judging effectiveness was functional status assessed by HAQ. Secondary outcomes included Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form (AIMS2-SF) and radiological worsening measured by Simple Narrowing Erosion Score (SENS). Clinical evaluation consisted of disease activity score (DAS 28), cycling aerobic fitness and dexterity. Dexterity was measured using Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA) and Duruoz Hand Index (DHI). Data were collected at baseline 1, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled. HAQ improved throughout the length of the trial in the DEP group. This improvement was greater in DEP than in the standard joint rehabilitation group at 1 month (-0.2 vs no variation from baseline, P = 0.04), but not at 6 months (-0.2 vs -0.1 in control group, P = 0.25) or 12 months (-0.1 vs no variation in control group, P = 0.51). DEP improved NHP (-23 vs + 7% in control group, P = 0.01) and aerobic fitness (+0.3 vs + 0.1 km per 5 min in control group, P = 0.02) at 1 month but the progress was not statistically significant thereafter. DEP also improved DHI, SODA, DAS 28 and AIMS2-SF, although not significantly. CONCLUSION: DEP was effective on functional status assessed by HAQ, quality of life and aerobic fitness at 1 month.

Trocmé C, Marotte H, Baillet A, Pallot-Prades B, Garin J, Grange L, Miossec P, Tebib J, Berger F, Nissen MJ, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. · GREPI CNRS UMR 5525, INSERM IFR 130, Université J Fourier, Grenoble, France. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18664547 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The use of biologicals such as infliximab has dramatically improved the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors predictive of therapeutic response need to be identified. A proteomic study was performed prior to infliximab therapy to identify a panel of candidate protein biomarkers of RA predictive of treatment response. METHODS: Plasma profiles of 60 patients with RA (28 non-responders (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)) negative and 32 responders (ACR70 positive) to infliximab) were studied by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) technology on two types of arrays, an anion exchange array (SAX2) and a nickel affinity array (IMAC3-Ni). Biomarker characterisation was carried out using classical biochemical methods (purification by ammonium sulfate precipitation or metal affinity chromatography) and identification by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis. RESULTS: Two distinct protein profiles were observed on both arrays and several proteins were differentially expressed in both patient populations. Five proteins at 3.86, 7.77, 7.97, 8.14 and 74.07 kDa were overexpressed in the non-responder group, whereas one at 28 kDa was increased in the responder population (sensitivity>56%, specificity>77.5%). Moreover, combination of several biomarkers improved the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of patient response to over 97%. The 28 kDa protein was characterised as apolipoprotein A-I and the 7.77 kDa biomarker was identified as platelet factor 4. CONCLUSIONS: Six plasma biomarkers are characterised, enabling the detection of patient response to infliximab with high sensitivity and specificity. Apolipoprotein A-1 was predictive of a good response to infliximab, whereas platelet factor 4 was associated with non-responders.