Rheumatoid Arthritis: Almeida C

Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Almeida C, Richards P, Lowe R, Greenwood R, Kirwan J, Anonymous00057. · School of Nursing, University of the West of England, Bristol UK. · Musculoskeletal Care. · Pubmed #18228530 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Patient education in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aims to improve health outcomes by prompting people to adopt self-management behaviours. One precursor for initiating behaviour change is self-efficacy (SE), a belief that you can do a task. This study tested the sensitivity to change of a new scale to measure SE for self-management in people with RA, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy scale (RASE). Exploratory analysis examined potential predictors of change in SE. METHODS: People with RA at 11 rheumatology centres, who had accepted an education programme as part of clinical care, completed questionnaires at baseline, and two and eight weeks after their programme end. Programmes were not standardized, as this was a pragmatic study in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients participated. After controlling for baseline scores, the RASE showed small but significant improvements in SE from baseline (RASE 107.57, CI 105.42-109.72) to two weeks after programme end (RASE 110.80, CI 108.60-112.99), and eight weeks (RASE 110.62, CI 108.40-112.85, p<0.001). Standardized response means, calculated both by absolute and percentage change, were 0.339 and 0.371 at two weeks after programme end, and 0.321 and 0.352 at eight weeks. Changes in the RASE were associated with behaviour initiation at two and eight weeks (r=0.419, r=0.342, p<0.001). No substantial predictors of change in SE could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: The RASE is sensitive to change in a cohort of people with RA in the UK receiving education programmes as routine clinical care. Exploratory analysis did not identify clinical or psychological factors that predict change in SE, suggesting that programmes should not be restricted to particular patients.

Almeida C, Clarke B, O'Brien A, Hammond A, Ryan S, Kay L, Hewlett S. · Academic Rheumatology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #16449368 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Rheumatological conditions are common and all health professionals (HPs) therefore need sufficient knowledge and skills to manage patients safely and effectively. The aim of this study was to examine current undergraduate education in rheumatology for HPs in the UK. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to curriculum organizers and clinical placement officers for all undergraduate courses in adult nursing, occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT) in the UK to ascertain the nature and amount of rheumatology theory and clinical exposure provided. RESULTS: Of the 47 adult nursing, 26 OT and 30 PT undergraduate courses surveyed, 85-90% responded. Overall, rheumatology teaching is 5-10 h over 3 yr. Nursing students receive moderate/in-depth teaching on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in only 52% of courses (OT 91%, PT 96%) and on osteoarthritis (OA) in 63% (OT 91%, PT 92%). Clinical experience of RA is probably/definitely available in only 56% of nursing courses (OT 72%, PT 88%), with similar results in OA. Overall, nursing students receive the least rheumatology exposure, particularly in psychosocial issues and symptom management, while PT students receive the most. OT students have limited opportunities for clinical exposure to psychosocial and joint protection issues. Use of local rheumatology clinical HP experts is variable (18-93%) and cross-disciplinary exposure is limited (0-36%). Many educators consider their rheumatology training to be insufficient (nursing 50%, PT 42%, OT 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatology training for undergraduate HPs is limited in key areas and often fails to take advantage of local clinical expertise, with nursing students particularly restricted. Clinical HP experts should consider novel methods of addressing these shortfalls within the limited curriculum time available.