Rheumatoid Arthritis: Aceves-Avila FJ

Ramos-Remus C, Dorazco-Barragan G, Aceves-Avila FJ, Alcaraz-Lopez F, Fuentes-Ramirez F, Michel-Diaz J, Torres-Bugarin O, Ventura-Aguilar A, Zuñiga-González G. · Department of Rheumatology, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #12051400 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether: (i) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have more micronuclei (MN) than healthy controls; (ii) methotrexate (MTX) treated RA patients have more MN than those not using MTX, and (iii) folic acid supplementation decreases the number of MN in MTX treated patients. METHODS: MN assays were performed in oral mucosa sweeps of 50 consecutive MTX treated RA patients, 30 consecutive RA patients not receiving MTX and 39 healthy controls. MTX treated RA patients were then randomly placed in a cross-over design to receive folic acid supplementation, and MN assays were repeated after 6 weeks. RESULTS: The MTX-RA patients had a mean age of 46 +/- 10 yrs and a mean disease duration of 12 +/- 9 yrs; 80% were women. The MTX dose range was 8.7 +/- 1.5 mg/week and the mean duration of use was 16 +/- 18 months. In the non-MTX RA group, the mean age was 48 +/- 14 yrs, the mean disease duration was 13 +/- 9 yrs, and 87% were women. At baseline, the number of MN were significantly higher in RA patients as compared with controls (3.31 +/- 2.3 vs 0.8 +/- 0.8, p <0.001). No difference in MN numbers was observed between users and non-users of MTX. Folic acid supplementation did not decrease the MN number in the MTX treated RA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Genotoxicity, as assessed by the MN assay, is increased in RA patients. These results suggest that genotoxicity is associated with RA itself and not with MTX use. Folic acid supplementation had no effect on the number of MN.

Mould-Quevedo J, Peláez-Ballestas I, Vázquez-Mellado J, Terán-Estrada L, Esquivel-Valerio J, Ventura-Ríos L, Aceves-Avila FJ, Bernard-Medina AG, Goycochea-Robles MV, Hernández-Garduño A, Burgos-Vargas R, Shumski C, Garza-Elizondo M, Ramos-Remus C, Espinoza-Villalpando J, Alvarez-Hernández E, Flores-Alvarado D, Rodríguez-Amado J, Casasola-Vargas J, Skinner-Taylor C, Anonymous00077. · Unidad de Investigación en Economía de la Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México D.F., México. · Gac Med Mex. · Pubmed #18714591 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the social costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and gout from the patient's perspective. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of the cost and resource utilization of 690 RA, AS, and gout patients from 10 medical centers and private facilities in five cities of Mexico. The information was obtained from the baseline of a dynamic cohort. We estimated out-of-pocket expenses, institutional direct costs, and direct medical costs. RESULTS: The mean (SD) annual out-of-pocket expense (USD) was $610.0 ($302.2) for RA, $578.6 ($220.5) for AS, and $245.3 ($124.0) for gout. Figures correspond to 15%, 9.6%, and 2.5% of the family income. They also represented 26.1%, 25.3%, and 24.4% of the total annual cost per RA, AS, and gout patients, respectively. The expected direct institutional patient/year costs were 1,724.2 for RA, $1,710.8 for AS, and $760.7 for gout. The total patient annual costs were $2,334.3 for RA, $2,289.4 for AS, and $1,006.1 for gout. Most out-of-pocket expenses were used to purchase drugs, pay for laboratory tests, imaging studies, and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, the cost of RA, AS, and gout represents 25% of direct medical costs. The cost of RA is higher than that for AS and gout.

Aceves-Avila FJ, Benites-Godínez V. · Hospital General Regional No. 46, IMSS, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. · J Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18679134 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To measure the frequency of drug allergies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and register the causal drug, the type, and severity of the reaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Direct interview and chart review in patients with RA and SLE were conducted. We registered demographic data, drug allergies, the causal drug, how causality was assessed, and the type and severity of the allergic reaction. We include as drug allergies only those cases in which the result of exposure and re-exposure was known or in which a physician evaluating the original event established the causality link with the suspected drug. Differences between groups were assessed by chi test. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-three RA and 58 patients with SLE were included. Fifty-three of the patients with RA (18%) and 20 of the patients with SLE (34.3%, P = 0.049) reported drug allergies. Most of them presented skin rash as their clinical expression of allergy (73%); anaphylaxis was reported in 4 cases (5%). Allergy to sulfa drugs is found more frequently in SLE (P = 0.0079). No differences were found when comparing the frequency of other drug allergies, such as penicillin and metamizole. DISCUSSION: Drug allergies are more frequent in SLE than in RA. Sulfa drugs are still the most frequent cause of drug allergies in SLE. Allergies because of drugs forbidden in the United States but easily available in specific ethnic groups are frequent in patients with SLE and RA. Their specific consumption must be intentionally assessed in cases of suspected drug allergies.

Ramos-Remus C, Sierra-Jimenez G, Skeith K, Aceves-Avila FJ, Russell AS, Offer R, Olguin-Redes JE, Homik J, Sanchez L, Sanchez-Ortiz A, Navarro-Cano G. · Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente, IMSS, Guadalajara, Mexico. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17646901 No free full text.

Abstract: The mean age of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) onset is around 50 years as reported in several clinical trials involving Caucasian patients. However, clinical observations suggest that Mexican RA patients' disease is initiated at a younger age. The objective of the study was to assess whether the age of onset of RA is different in Mexican and in Canadian RA patients. Certified rheumatologists from Canada and Mexico directly interviewed consecutive RA patients attending their clinics regarding the date patients first noticed a swollen joint. None of the participant rheumatologists were aware of the primary aim of this exploratory study at the time of the interviews. Data was gathered from 161 Mexican (91% women) and 130 Canadian (77% women) RA patients collected by three rheumatologists in each country. Duration since disease onset was not different within countries (mean 95% confidence interval [CI] for differences -10 to 16 years, p = 0.12 for Canadians, and -6 to 10 years, p = 0.26, for Mexicans). However, there was a significant difference between the two countries. Mexicans patients on average developed RA almost 12 years younger than Canadians (95% CI for difference 9 to 15 years, p < 0.001). Frequency distribution showed that 35.5% of Canadians but only 4% of Mexicans had the onset of the disease after the age of 55 (all p < 0.001). It appears that RA begins at a much younger age in Mexican than Canadian patients. If this were confirmed after controlling for different confounders and biases, it would have important societal, economic, and therapeutic implications.

Aceves-Avila FJ, Delgadillo-Ruano MA, Ramos-Remus C, Gómez-Vargas A. · Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. · Reumatismo. · Pubmed #12089617 links to  free full text

Abstract: The rheumatic conditions found in New Spain during the sixteenth century were not different from those seen in Mexico in present times. We present the humoral conceptions on which medical theory was based in those times, and the contributions made by Alonso López de Hinojosos during his practice in the Hospital Real de San Josef de los Naturales, in Mexico City. Among them were the clinical distinction between gout and rheumatoid arthritis more than one hundred years before Sydenham, and the identification of arthritis and ocular involvement associated with a contagious disease more than three hundred years before Reiter. We conclude that the analysis of ancient medical traditions is an interesting and fruitful enterprise.

Aceves-Avila FJ, Medina F, Fraga A. · Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional No. 46, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco, DF México. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11327245 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the existence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before the 19th century. METHODS: Survey of primary and secondary references on the history of rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Paleopathological evidence suggests the existence of RA in America since 8000 BC and in Europe since the 7th century. Descriptions and representations of a symmetric chronic polyarthritis producing characteristic deformities can be found in Rome since 100 BC and India since 500 BC. The first clinical distinction between RA and gout was published in Mexico in 1578. Different historical conditions contributed to lack of recognition of RA by official medicine before 1800. The recognition of RA as a distinct entity in the 19th century was influenced by socioeconomic circumstances. CONCLUSION: RA is not a recent disease. Historical investigation can provide useful clues on its pathogeny.