Anxiety Disorders: Moore M

Meltzer LJ, Moore M. · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. · J Pediatr Psychol. · Pubmed #18084038 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the prevalence, causes, and consequences of sleep disruptions in parents of youth with chronic illnesses. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PsychInfo, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for articles related to sleep in parents of youth with chronic illnesses yielded 59 potential articles, with 19 meeting inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Parents of children with eczema were the most commonly studied group. The prevalence of sleep disruptions was 15-86%. Potential causes of parent sleep disruptions included nighttime caregiving, monitoring of the child's illness, and stress related to the child's illness. Consequences included poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of youth with chronic illnesses experience sleep disruptions, providing a potential mechanism to explain elevated rates of negative daytime functioning found in previous studies. To provide interventions and support for these parents, additional research is needed to address the limitations of the existing literature.

Little P, Somerville J, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Wiles R, George S, Smith A, Peveler R. · Primary Medical Care Group, Aldemoor Health Centre, Southampton. · Br J Gen Pract. · Pubmed #11766871 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Increasing consultation rates have implications for the organisation of health services, the quality of care, and understanding the decision to consult. Most quantitative studies have concentrated on very high attenders--not those attending five or more times a year, who are responsible for most (60%) consultations--and have assessed neither the role of lifestyle nor patients' attitudes. AIMS: To assess associations with higher than average attendance (five or more times ayear). DESIGN OF STUDY: Postal questionnaire sent to a random sample. SETTING: Four thousand adults (one per household) from six general practices. METHOD: Data were analysed to identify predictors significantly associated with higher than average attendance. RESULTS: The response rate was 74%. Sef-reported attendance agreed with the notes (r = 0.80, likelihood ratio for a positive test = 9.4). Higher attendance was independently predicted by the severity of ill health (COOP score = 0-7, 8-9, and 10+; adjusted odds ratios= 1, 1.72, 1.91 respectively; test for trend P<0.001) and the number of reported medical problems (COOP score = 0, 1, 2, and 3+ respectively; adjusted ORs = 1, 2.05, 2.31, 4.29; P<0.001). After controlling for sociodemographic variables, medical problems, the severity of physical ill health, and other confounders, high attendance was more likely in those with medically unexplained somatic symptoms (0, 1-2, 3-5, and 6+ symptoms respectively, ORs = 1, 1.15, 1.48, and 1.62; P<0.001); health anxiety (Whitely Index = 0, 1-5, 6-7 and 8+ respectively, ORs = 1, 1.22, 1.77, and 2.78; P<0.001); and poor perceived health ('very good', 'good', 'poor' respectively, ORs = 1, 1.61, and 2.93; P<0.001). Attendance was less likely in those with negative attitudes to repeated surgery use (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78), or to doctors (Negdoc scale <18, 18-20, and 21+ respectively; ORs = 1, 0.87, 0.67; P<0.001), in those usually trying the pharmacy first (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78), and those consuming alcohol (0, 1, 2, 3+ units/day respectively; ORs = 1, 0.62, 0.41, 0.29; P<0.001). Anxiety or depression predicted perceived health, unexplained symptoms, and health anxiety. CONCLUSION: Strategies to manage somatic symptoms, health anxiety, dealing with the causes of--or treating--anxiety and depression, and encouraging use of the pharmacy have the potential both to help patients manage symptoms and in the decision to consult. Sensitivity to the psychological factors contributing to the decision to consult should help doctors achieve a better shared understanding with their patients and help inform appropriate treatment strategies.

Little P, Somerville J, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Wiles R, George S, Smith A, Peveler R. · Primary Medical Care Group, Aldemoor Health Centre, Southampton. · Br J Gen Pract. · Pubmed #11766870 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: A quarter of all consultations are for children, but there is little quantitative evidence documenting what parental factors are important in the decision to consult. AIM: To assess parental factors in higher child attendance (three or more times per year)--the 32% responsible for most (69%) general practice consultations with children. DESIGN OF STUDY: A random sample of 4000 individuals (one per household), including 670 children. SETTING: Six general practices within a 30-mile radius of the administrative centre. METHOD: Parents completed a postal questionnaire for themselves and their child. The adult questionnaire documented lifestyle, attitude to doctors and medicine, Kokko's personality types, perceived health, health anxiety, number of medical problems, medically unexplained somatic symptoms, and willingness to tolerate symptoms. The child questionnaire documented perceived health, the number of medical problems, somatic symptom inventory, willingness to tolerate symptoms, and self-reported attendance. RESULTS: (Adjusted odds ratios, test for trend, 95% confidence intervals.) A response rate of 490/670 (73%) paired adult and child questionnaires was obtained. Reported higher attendance was valid compared with the notes (likelihood ratio positive test = 5.2, negative test = 0.24), and was independently predicted by the child's age, medical problems, council house occupancy, and by the parents' assessment of the severity of the child's ill health. After controlling for these variables, higher attendance was more likely if the parents were higher attenders (adjusted OR = 3.71, 95% CI = 2.31-5.98), and if they perceived their children had medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) (for 0, 1, 2, 3+ symptoms; adjusted ORs (95% CIs) = 1, 3.1 (1.7-5.7), 2.30 (0.97-5.5), 4.2 (1.8-9.6) respectively, P < or = 0.001). Attendance was less likely if they were willing to tolerate symptoms in their children (score for seven normally self-limiting scenarios = 0-17, 18-29 and 30+; adjusted ORs = 1, 0.71, 0.39 respectively, z for trend P = 0.03), willingness to tolerate symptoms and parental perception of child MUPS were associated with council house tenancy and health anxiety. Parents' perception of child MUPS also related to perception of child health and the parents' own MUPS. Parents of higher attenders were more likely to be depressed (HAD depression scale = 0-7, 8-10, 11+ respectively; adjusted ORs (95% CIs) = 1, 2.04 (1.27-3.27), 1.60 (0.75-3.42)) or anxious (anxiety scale 0-7, 8-10, 11+, respectively; adjusted ORs [95% CIs] = 1, 1.60 [0.99-2.58], 1.97 [1.20-3.26]). CONCLUSION: Important parental factors are council house tenancy, the parents' perception of and willingness to tolerate, somatic symptoms in the child, and the parents' own attendance history, health anxiety, and perception of somatic symptoms Doctors should be sensitive to the parental and family factors that underlie the decision to consult and of the needs of parents of high-attending children.