Anxiety Disorders: Mellman L

Ursano RJ, Bell C, Eth S, Friedman M, Norwood A, Pfefferbaum B, Pynoos JD, Zatzick DF, Benedek DM, McIntyre JS, Charles SC, Altshuler K, Cook I, Cross CD, Mellman L, Moench LA, Norquist G, Twemlow SW, Woods S, Yager J, Anonymous00293, Anonymous00294. · No affiliation provided · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15617511 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hobday G, Mellman L, Gabbard GO. · Baylor College of Medicine, 6655 Travis St., Suite 500, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #19047333 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Marshall R, Spitzer R, Vaughan S, Vaughan R, Mellman L, MacKinnon R, Roose S. · Anxiety Disorders Clinic, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11156821 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To address both clinical and ethical concerns in psychiatric research, the study assessed the subjective experience of being a participant in a feasibility study of outcome in long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. METHOD: A questionnaire assessing positive and negative reactions to three typical research methodologies (self-report questionnaires, structured diagnostic interviews, and tape-recording of sessions) was administered to 23 patient-therapist pairs. RESULTS: Patients reported that questionnaires and interviews were slightly to moderately helpful in promoting self-realization and facilitating therapy, and not at all to slightly intrusive and disruptive. Adjustment to audiotaping of sessions was rapid (within two sessions). Therapists significantly overestimated the negative effects and underestimated the positive benefit patients reported from participating in research. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional objections to research in dynamic psychotherapy on the grounds that patients experience research procedures as significantly intrusive and disruptive appear to be unfounded.

Vaughan SC, Marshall RD, Mackinnon RA, Vaughan R, Mellman L, Roose SP. · No affiliation provided · Int J Psychoanal. · Pubmed #10967773 No free full text.

Abstract: Despite the widespread use of long-term psychodynamic treatments, methodologically rigorous outcome studies have not been conducted. The authors describe the results of a feasibility study designed to (1) investigate whether patients in psychodynamic treatment, including psychoanalysis, could be recruited and retained as research subjects, (2) determine patient and therapist compliance with self-report measures, rater-administered structured interviews and session audiotaping and (3) obtain pilot data on changes in these measures after one year of treatment. Nine patients entering psychoanalysis and fifteen entering psychodynamic psychotherapy were studied at baseline, six months and one year. Major findings were as follows: (1) recruitment rates were 27% (psychoanalysis) and 83% (psychotherapy), (2) all patients who remained in treatment remained in the research protocol, (3) drop-out rates among research participants and non-participants were equivalent, (4) current Axis I (usually affective or anxiety) disorders were found in over 60% of patients, (5) Axis II disorders in the absence of current Axis I disorders were rare, (6) despite a small number (N) of participants, significant positive change was demonstrated on a variety of measures after one year. Results suggest that it is possible to demonstrate a therapeutic effect of psychodynamic treatments, including psychoanalysis, but changing negative clinical perceptions of research is necessary if methodologically rigorous outcome studies are to be possible in the future.