Alzheimer Disease: Thomas RG

Petersen RC, Thomas RG, Grundman M, Bennett D, Doody R, Ferris S, Galasko D, Jin S, Kaye J, Levey A, Pfeiffer E, Sano M, van Dyck CH, Thal LJ, Anonymous00379. · Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #15829527 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment is a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and early Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we evaluated subjects with the amnestic subtype of mild cognitive impairment. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 2000 IU of vitamin E daily, 10 mg of donepezil daily, or placebo for three years. The primary outcome was clinically possible or probable Alzheimer's disease; secondary outcomes were cognition and function. RESULTS: A total of 769 subjects were enrolled, and possible or probable Alzheimer's disease developed in 212. The overall rate of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease was 16 percent per year. As compared with the placebo group, there were no significant differences in the probability of progression to Alzheimer's disease in the vitamin E group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.41; P=0.91) or the donepezil group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.13; P=0.42) during the three years of treatment. Prespecified analyses of the treatment effects at 6-month intervals showed that as compared with the placebo group, the donepezil group had a reduced likelihood of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of the study (P=0.04), a finding supported by the secondary outcome measures. Among carriers of one or more apolipoprotein E epsilon4 alleles, the benefit of donepezil was evident throughout the three-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease between the vitamin E and placebo groups at any point, either among all patients or among apolipoprotein E epsilon4 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin E had no benefit in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Although donepezil therapy was associated with a lower rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of treatment, the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease after three years was not lower among patients treated with donepezil than among those given placebo.

Grundman M, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Thomas RG, Aisen PS, Bennett DA, Foster NL, Jack CR, Galasko DR, Doody R, Kaye J, Sano M, Mohs R, Gauthier S, Kim HT, Jin S, Schultz AN, Schafer K, Mulnard R, van Dyck CH, Mintzer J, Zamrini EY, Cahn-Weiner D, Thal LJ, Anonymous00151. · Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California-San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite 227, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #14732621 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and very early dementia and is becoming increasingly recognized as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). The Memory Impairment Study (MIS) is a multicenter clinical trial in patients with MCI designed to evaluate whether vitamin E or donepezil is effective at delaying the time to a clinical diagnosis of AD. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with MCI recruited for the MIS and compare them with those of elderly controls and patients with AD in another clinical trial. DESIGN: Descriptive and comparative study of patients with MCI participating in a multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Memory disorder centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 769 patients with MCI, 107 cognitively normal elderly controls, 122 patients with very mild AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 0.5), and 183 patients with mild AD (CDR 1.0) were evaluated. Patients in the MIS met operational criteria for amnestic MCI. Controls were recruited in parallel with the MCI group, underwent the same assessments, and had a CDR of 0. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, neuropsychologic, functional, neuroimaging, and genetic measures. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale scores were 5.6 +/- 3.3 for controls, 11.3 +/- 4.4 for patients with MCI, 18.0 +/- 6.2 for the AD CDR 0.5 group, and 25.2 +/- 8.8 for the AD CDR 1.0 group. Compared with controls, patients with MCI were most impaired on memory tasks, with less severe impairments in other cognitive domains. Patients with MCI were more likely than controls but less likely than patients with AD to carry the apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele. Patients with MCI had hippocampal volumes that were intermediate between those of controls and patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCI had a predominant memory impairment with relative sparing of other cognitive domains and were intermediate between clinically normal individuals and patients with AD on cognitive and functional ratings. These results demonstrate the successful implementation of operational criteria for this unique group of at-risk patients in a multicenter clinical trial.

Thal LJ, Grundman M, Berg J, Ernstrom K, Margolin R, Pfeiffer E, Weiner MF, Zamrini E, Thomas RG. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla 92093-0624, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #14663031 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of idebenone on the rate of decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A 1-year, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted. Subjects were over age 50 with a diagnosis of probable AD and had Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores between 12 and 25. Subjects were treated with idebenone 120, 240, or 360 mg tid, each of which was compared with placebo. Primary outcome measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subcomponent (ADAS-Cog) and a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Secondary outcome measures included measurements of activities of daily living, the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale, and the MMSE. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six subjects were enrolled and randomized to the four groups. Except for a slight difference in age, there were no differences in patient characteristics at baseline. For the primary outcome measures, there were no significant overall differences between the treatment groups in the prespecified four-group design. In an exploratory two-group analysis comparing all three treated groups combined with placebo, drug-treated patients performed better on the ADAS-Cog in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and completers analyses. There were no differences in the CGIC scores for the ITT or completers analyses in either the four-group or the two-group analyses. There were no overall differences on any of the secondary outcome measures in any of the analyses. CONCLUSION: Idebenone failed to slow cognitive decline in AD that was of sufficient magnitude to be clinically significant.

Aisen PS, Schafer KA, Grundman M, Pfeiffer E, Sano M, Davis KL, Farlow MR, Jin S, Thomas RG, Thal LJ, Anonymous00135. · Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #12783912 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Laboratory evidence that inflammatory mechanisms contribute to neuronal injury in Alzheimer disease (AD), along with epidemiological evidence, suggests that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may favorably influence the course of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with a selective cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 inhibitor (rofecoxib) or a traditional nonselective NSAID (naproxen) slows cognitive decline in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial, with 1-year exposure to study medications. SETTING: Forty ambulatory treatment centers affiliated with the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study consortium. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with mild-to-moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score of 13-26) were recruited from December 1999 to November 2000 using clinic populations, referrals from community physicians, and local advertising. Stable use of cholinesterase inhibitors, estrogen, low-dose aspirin, and vitamin E was allowed. Participants with inflammatory diseases that might respond to the study medications were excluded. Of 474 participants screened, 351 were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Once-daily rofecoxib, 25 mg, or twice-daily naproxen sodium, 220 mg, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the 1-year change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) subscale score. Secondary outcome measures included the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum-of-boxes, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, the Quality of Life-AD, and the time to attainment of significant end points (4-point decline from baseline ADAS-Cog score, 1-step worsening on the global Clinical Dementia Rating scale, 15-point decline on the ADCS activities of daily living inventory, institutionalization, or death). RESULTS: The 1-year mean (SD) change in ADAS-Cog scores in participants treated with naproxen (5.8 [8.0]) or rofecoxib (7.6 [7.7]) was not significantly different from the change in participants treated with placebo (5.7 [8.2]). Results of secondary analyses showed no consistent benefit of either treatment. Fatigue, dizziness, and hypertension were more commonly reported in the active drug groups, and more serious adverse events were found in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that rofecoxib or low-dose naproxen does not slow cognitive decline in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.

Thal LJ, Thomas RG, Mulnard R, Sano M, Grundman M, Schneider L. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #12580705 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an association exists between estradiol and estrone levels and measures of cognitive functioning in women with Alzheimer disease (AD) treated with conjugated equine estrogen (Premarin; Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, Pa). METHODS: We studied 120 postmenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy and who had AD treated with Premarin for 1 year. Plasma estradiol and estrone levels were determined at multiple points during the 1-year treatment trial. The change from baseline level at 2 and 12 months was associated with the change score on 7 different assessments of cognitive functioning. RESULTS: At baseline, estradiol levels were low and there were no associations between the estradiol level and the 7 neuropsychological measures. A similar pattern was observed for estrone treatment. During treatment with 0.625 mg/d of Premarin, estradiol levels increased about 4-fold; while receiving 1.25 mg/d of Premarin, estradiol levels increased about 8-fold. A similar pattern was seen with estrone treatment. For both estradiol and estrone levels, there were no significant associations between the change in plasma level and the change in neuropsychological test scores at either 2 or 12 months. CONCLUSION: Although Premarin elevated estradiol and estrone levels, there was no association between hormone levels and cognitive functioning after either 2 or 12 months of treatment.

Aisen PS, Berg JD, Craft S, Peskind ER, Sano M, Teri L, Mulnard RA, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 1Bles Building, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA. · Psychoneuroendocrinology. · Pubmed #12445840 No free full text.

Abstract: Glucose and insulin may play an important role in the pathophysiology and symptomatology of Alzheimers disease (AD), and prior studies suggest interactions among glucose, insulin, gender and apolipoprotein E genotype. We analyzed the relationship between steroid-induced glucose elevation and gender, presence of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE-4) allele and cognition using data from a multicenter trial of prednisone therapy in AD. The low-dose prednisone regimen (initial dose: 20 mg/day, maintenance dose: 10 mg/day) caused a moderate increase in random blood glucose (mean post-baseline glucose 115 mg/dl). There was a significant interaction between rise in glucose, gender and presence of the APOE-4 allele. There was no important relationship between glucose and cognitive function at baseline or with prednisone treatment. Meta-analysis including data from three other AD trials showed a small influence of random blood glucose on cognitive scores. These results support a relationship between gender, apolipoprotein E genotype and glucose metabolism, but do not indicate that mild changes in glucose have an important impact on cognitive function.

Teri L, Logsdon RG, Peskind E, Raskind M, Weiner MF, Tractenberg RE, Foster NL, Schneider LS, Sano M, Whitehouse P, Tariot P, Mellow AM, Auchus AP, Grundman M, Thomas RG, Schafer K, Thal LJ, Anonymous00040. · University of Washington, Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, Seattle 98195-7263, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #11087767 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Treatment of agitation is a crucial problem in the care of patients with AD. Although antipsychotic and antidepressant medications and behavior management techniques (BMT) have each been used to treat agitation, clinical trials of these treatments have been characterized by small sample sizes and uncontrolled treatment designs. OBJECTIVE: To compare haloperidol, trazodone, and BMT with placebo in the treatment of agitation in AD outpatients. METHODS: A total of 149 patients with AD and their caregivers participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Blind assessment was conducted at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment. The three active treatments were haloperidol, trazodone, and BMT. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included patient agitation, cognition, and function, and caregiver burden. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of subjects improved relative to baseline. No significant differences on outcome were obtained between haloperidol (mean dose, 1.8 mg/d), trazodone (mean dose, 200 mg/d), BMT, or placebo. Significantly fewer adverse events of bradykinesia and parkinsonian gait were evident in the BMT arm. No other significant difference in adverse events was seen. Symptoms did not respond differentially to the different treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable modest reductions in agitation occurred in patients receiving haloperidol, trazodone, BMT, and placebo. More effective pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and combination treatments are needed.

Weiner MF, Tractenberg R, Teri L, Logsdon R, Thomas RG, Gamst A, Thal LJ. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235-9070, USA. · J Psychiatr Res. · Pubmed #10758259 No free full text.

Abstract: In the course of a four-month study of interventions for behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, the following assessment instruments were examined for validity: the clinical global impression of change (CGIC), Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI); CERAD behavioral rating scale for dementia (BRSD), revised memory and behavioral problems checklist (RMBPC) and the agitated behavior in dementia scale (ABID). The four specific behavioral/agitation scales had excellent cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations with each other, suggesting high validity, but changes as indicated by CGIC scores did not correlate well with change scores on the other instruments. We conclude that specific behavioral instruments are preferable to the more general CGIC for detecting and quantifying behavioral disturbances in AD patients.

Aisen PS, Davis KL, Berg JD, Schafer K, Campbell K, Thomas RG, Weiner MF, Farlow MR, Sano M, Grundman M, Thal LJ. · Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #10680787 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Laboratory and epidemiologic studies suggest that anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive therapy may be useful in the treatment of AD. In preliminary studies, a regimen of low to moderate dose prednisone was found to suppress peripheral inflammatory markers without adverse effects in subjects with AD. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial to determine whether prednisone treatment slowed the rate of cognitive decline in AD. The active treatment regimen consisted of an initial dose of 20 mg of prednisone daily for 4 weeks tapered to a maintenance dose of 10 mg daily for 1 year, followed by gradual withdrawal during an additional 16 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 1-year change in the cognitive subscale of the AD Assessment Scale. RESULTS: A total of 138 subjects were randomized to the drug and placebo groups. There was no difference in cognitive decline between the prednisone and placebo treatment groups in the primary intent-to-treat analysis, or in a secondary analysis considering completers only. Subjects treated with prednisone showed behavioral decline compared with those in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: A low-dose regimen of prednisone is not useful in the treatment of AD.

Logsdon RG, Teri L, Weiner MF, Gibbons LE, Raskind M, Peskind E, Grundman M, Koss E, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7263, USA. · J Am Geriatr Soc. · Pubmed #10573447 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a new measure of agitation, the Agitated Behavior in Dementia scale (ABID). The ABID consists of 16 items designed specifically to evaluate frequency of and caregiver reaction to common agitated behaviors in community-residing dementia patients. DESIGN: The ABID was administered at the baseline assessment of a multi-site controlled treatment study to reduce agitation in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Reliability was assessed by evaluating internal consistency and test-retest correlations. Validity was assessed by examining correlations with other constructs, including demographics, cognitive status, and overall behavioral disturbance. SETTING: Twenty-one sites across the US, comprising the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, contributed subjects to the investigation. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 community-residing AD patients, living with a spouse or adult relative who acted as an informant. Mean age was 75 years, and mean Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score was 13. MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive status was assessed using the MMSE. Behavioral disturbance was assessed using the Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease, the Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist, and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory. RESULTS: Reliability of the ABID was excellent, with internal consistency of 0.70 and test-retest reliability of 0.60 to 0.73. Validity was confirmed by correlations with related measures and lack of correlation with unrelated constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The ABID is brief, easy to administer, and provides objectively anchored observations of problems. It is a promising measure for studies of community-residing AD patients.

Bondi MW, Salmon DP, Galasko D, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Psychiatry and School of Medicine, University of California, 92161, USA. · Psychol Aging. · Pubmed #10403716 No free full text.

Abstract: Nondemented older adults genotyped for the Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon4 allele (n = 43) were neuropsychologically compared to participants without a copy of the epsilon4 allele (n = 90). At baseline, the groups did not differ on age, education, gender, or global cognitive status. ApoE-epsilon4 participants demonstrated significantly poorer mean performances on delayed recall, but no significant group differences emerged on attention, language, constructional skills, psychomotor speed, or executive function. Significantly more ApoE-epsilon4 participants developed probable or questionable Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared with non-epsilon4 participants, suggesting that the group differences resulted from a preponderance of preclinical AD cases within the epsilon4 group and not from a direct influence of ApoE genotype on cognition. Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusting for age, years of education, and global cognitive status, revealed that ApoE-epsilon4 allele status and measures of recall performance were significant and independent predictors of conversion to AD. Results support the importance of specific episodic memory changes and possession of the ApoE-epsilon4 allele in the preclinical detection of AD.

Irizarry MC, Raman R, Schwarzschild MA, Becerra LM, Thomas RG, Peterson RC, Ascherio A, Aisen PS. · Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. · Neurodegener Dis. · Pubmed #19066433 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Impaired antioxidant defenses are implicated in neurodegenerative disease. The plasma levels of urate, a water-soluble antioxidant, are reduced in Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the hypotheses that high plasma urate at baseline is associated with: (1) a reduced rate of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD and (2) a lower rate of cognitive decline in MCI. METHODS: Plasma urate was obtained at baseline from 747 participants in a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of donepezil, vitamin E or placebo for delaying the progression of MCI to AD.The association between baseline urate and conversion from MCI to AD was examined by Cox proportional hazards regression. The relationship between baseline urate and cognitive change on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale was evaluated by longitudinal analysis. RESULTS: Baseline plasma urate was not associated with the rate of conversion of MCI to AD. In the placebo arm, high plasma urate was related to a slower rate of cognitive decline over 3 years, although this was not reproduced in the other treatment arms. CONCLUSION: While plasma urate levels did not predict the progression of MCI to AD, high urate may be associated with a reduced rate of cognitive decline in MCI patients not treated with donepezil or vitamin E. The results support the investigation of biomarkers of antioxidant status as risk factors for cognitive decline in MCI.

Aisen PS, Schneider LS, Sano M, Diaz-Arrastia R, van Dyck CH, Weiner MF, Bottiglieri T, Jin S, Stokes KT, Thomas RG, Thal LJ, Anonymous00042. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, M/C 0949, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #18854539 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Blood levels of homocysteine may be increased in Alzheimer disease (AD) and hyperhomocysteinemia may contribute to disease pathophysiology by vascular and direct neurotoxic mechanisms. Even in the absence of vitamin deficiency, homocysteine levels can be reduced by administration of high-dose supplements of folic acid and vitamins B(6) and B(12). Prior studies of B vitamins to reduce homocysteine in AD have not had sufficient size or duration to assess their effect on cognitive decline. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of B vitamin supplementation in the treatment of AD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial of high-dose folate, vitamin B(6), and vitamin B(12) supplementation in 409 (of 601 screened) individuals with mild to moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 14 and 26, inclusive) and normal folic acid, vitamin B(12), and homocysteine levels. The study was conducted between February 20, 2003, and December 15, 2006, at clinical research sites of the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study located throughout the United States. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups of unequal size to increase enrollment (60% treated with high-dose supplements [5 mg/d of folate, 25 mg/d of vitamin B(6), 1 mg/d of vitamin B(12)] and 40% treated with identical placebo); duration of treatment was 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog). RESULTS: A total of 340 participants (202 in active treatment group and 138 in placebo group) completed the trial while taking study medication. Although the vitamin supplement regimen was effective in reducing homocysteine levels (mean [SD], -2.42 [3.35] in active treatment group vs -0.86 [2.59] in placebo group; P < .001), it had no beneficial effect on the primary cognitive measure, rate of change in ADAS-cog score during 18 months (0.372 points per month for placebo group vs 0.401 points per month for active treatment group, P = .52; 95% confidence interval of rate difference, -0.06 to 0.12; based on the intention-to-treat generalized estimating equations model), or on any secondary measures. A higher quantity of adverse events involving depression was observed in the group treated with vitamin supplements. CONCLUSION: This regimen of high-dose B vitamin supplements does not slow cognitive decline in individuals with mild to moderate AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056225.

Doody RS, Gavrilova SI, Sano M, Thomas RG, Aisen PS, Bachurin SO, Seely L, Hung D, Anonymous00052. · Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. · Lancet. · Pubmed #18640457 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although treatments for Alzheimer's disease sometimes improve cognition, functional ability, or behaviour compared with baseline levels, such improvements are inconsistent across studies and measures, and effects diminish over time. More effective treatments are needed. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of dimebon in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We enrolled 183 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] scores 10-24) at 11 sites in Russia. Patients were randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation scheme to receive oral dimebon, 20 mg three times a day (60 mg/day [n=89]), or matched placebo (n=94). Other antidementia drugs were not allowed. The primary outcome measure assessed cognition, the difference in mean change from baseline to week 26, or last completed observation on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog). All patients and study personnel were blinded throughout the study. We compared dimebon with placebo with an intention-to-treat analysis, with last observation carried forward (ITT-LOCF) imputation. Analyses were repeated on the fully evaluable population, defined as all patients in the intention-to-treat population who had an ADAS-cog at week 26 and at least 80% compliance. 134 patients (68 in dimebon group, 66 in placebo group) enrolled in the 6-month blinded extension phase of the study. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00377715. FINDINGS: 155 (85%) patients completed the trial (78 [88%] in dimebon group, 77 [82%] in placebo group). Treatment with dimebon resulted in significant benefits in ADAS-cog compared with placebo (ITT-LOCF) at week 26 (mean drug-placebo difference -4.0 [95% CI -5.73 to -2.28]; p<0.0001). Results of the ITT-LOCF and the evaluable population analyses were much the same for all measures. Patients given dimebon were significantly improved over baseline for ADAS-cog (mean difference -1.9 [-2.92 to -0.85]; p=0.0005). Dimebon was well tolerated: dry mouth and depressed mood or depression were the most common adverse events associated with dimebon (12 [14%] patients for each symptom by week 26). The percentage of patients who had adverse events in the two groups did not differ. INTERPRETATION: Dimebon was safe, well tolerated, and significantly improved the clinical course of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Sano M, Zhu CW, Whitehouse PJ, Edland S, Jin S, Ernstrom K, Thomas RG, Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Anonymous00342. · Mount Sinai School of Medicine, James J Peters VAMC, Bronx, NY 10468, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135812 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Prevention Instrument project of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) seeks to develop instruments to assess treatment efficacy including potential economic benefit. The Resource Use Inventory (RUI) is an instrument that has been used to capture resource utilization and costs in populations with Alzheimer disease (AD). However, resource utilization and costs for healthy, cognitively intact elderly as they begin to demonstrate cognitive deterioration are not well understood. In addition, the loss that relates to the subjects' own time as they transition through cognitive impairment is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of the RUI in a sample of cognitively intact elderly individuals living in the community and enrolled in AD prevention trials. METHODS: The RUI was administered to 644 subjects and their study partners either at home or in the clinic. For half of each sample, 3-month retesting was carried out. The RUI consisted of 9 questions. The first part of the RUI captured subjects' use of direct medical care (eg, hospitalizations) and nonmedical care (eg, home health aides). The second part of the RUI captured the time caregivers spend providing care to the subjects. The third part of the RUI captured subjects' participation in volunteer work and employment. The assessment interval for each question was the past 3 months. RESULTS: The percentage of RUI forms returned incomplete or inaccurate for both in-clinic and at-home groups was extremely low. There were no differences in utilization rates between in-clinic and at-home group for all items in the RUI. Except for use of outpatient procedures, tests, or treatments, there were no differences in utilization rates between subjects who filled out the RUI with the help of their study partners or by themselves. Items in the RUI were sensitive to subjects' cognitive and functional status and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based completion of the RUI by participants in an AD prevention study is feasible, and seems to provide data that are reliable and valid. The instrument will be useful for tracking resource and time use through transition from healthy to cognitive impairment.

Schafer KA, Tractenberg RE, Sano M, Mackell JA, Thomas RG, Gamst A, Thal LJ, Morris JC, Anonymous00016. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #15592134 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is quickly becoming a criterion standard in multicenter clinical trials in Alzheimer disease. An abbreviated version, with formal monitoring for consistency across sites and raters, is currently used in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS). OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the degree of agreement on CDR scoring of clinical monitors working independently from ADCS-CDR worksheets. DESIGN: Three members of the ADCS who are experienced and highly trained with respect to the CDR independently reviewed the ADCS-CDR worksheets of 15 subjects, assigning box and global CDR scores according to the prescribed algorithm. SETTING: The ratings were assigned during a single, 3-hour session in a closed room. PARTICIPANTS: Two clinical monitors and one project director/clinical monitor supervisor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent agreement, Kendall's tau-b, and Cohen's kappa were used to assess the degree of agreement of the raters with the previously established gold standard assessment on global and box scores for the 15 subjects. RESULTS: Raters, blinded to patient groupings, were in agreement with the Gold Standard global CDR assessment on 87% of ratings. Kappa values indicated good (kappa = 0.66, orientation and judgment & problem solving boxes) to excellent (kappa = 0.83, global CDR) agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The ADCS-CDR worksheets were reliably and consistently scored by clinical monitors, who may be considered proxy gold standards for CDR assessment.

Hamilton JM, Salmon DP, Galasko D, Delis DC, Hansen LA, Masliah E, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0948, USA. · J Int Neuropsychol Soc. · Pubmed #15327716 No free full text.

Abstract: Little is known about possible differences in the memory deficits that occur in Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compared 24 autopsy-confirmed DLB and 24 age-, education-, and MMSE-matched autopsy-confirmed AD patients on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory subtest. The DLB and AD groups were similarly impaired on CVLT Total Learning (Trials 15) and Long Delayed Free Recall, but the DLB group demonstrated relative improvement in Savings scores and on recognition testing compared to the AD group. Likewise, the patient groups were equally impaired on Logical Memory immediate and delayed recall, but the DLB group's Saving scores were significantly better than those of the AD patients. These results indicate that while both DLB and AD patients exhibit significant memory impairment, the ability to consolidate information may be less severely impaired in DLB patients than in AD patients.

Lange KL, Bondi MW, Salmon DP, Galasko D, Delis DC, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, USA. · J Int Neuropsychol Soc. · Pubmed #12405546 links to  free full text

Abstract: A subtle decline in episodic memory often occurs prior to the emergence of the full dementia syndrome in nondemented older adults who develop Alzheimer's disease (AD). The APOE-epsilon4 genotype may engender a more virulent form of AD that hastens this decline. To examine this possibility, we compared the rate of decline in episodic memory during the preclinical phase of AD in individuals with or without at least one APOE epsilon4 allele. Nondemented normal control (NC; n = 84) participants, nondemented older adults who subsequently developed dementia within 1 or 2 years (i.e., preclinical AD; n = 20), and patients with mild AD (n = 53) were examined with 2 commonly employed tests of episodic memory, the Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised and the California Verbal Learning Test. Results revealed a precipitous decline in verbal memory abilities 1 to 2 years prior to the onset of the dementia syndrome, but there was little effect of APOE genotype on the rate of this memory decline. The presence of an APOE-epsilon4 allele, however, did have a differential effect on the sensitivity of the 2 types of memory tests for tracking progression and made an independent contribution to the prediction of conversion to AD.

Salmon DP, Thomas RG, Pay MM, Booth A, Hofstetter CR, Thal LJ, Katzman R. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #12370456 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The growing propensity to diagnose AD in individuals with very mild cognitive impairment increases the danger of false-positive diagnostic errors. Unfortunately, there is little systematically acquired information about the accuracy of the AD diagnosis in very mildly impaired patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the diagnosis of AD in very mildly impaired patients and to identify objective measures that effectively distinguish these patients from elderly normal controls (NC). METHODS: Consecutive patients with Mini-Mental State Examination scores of > or = 24 who received a clinical diagnosis of AD were evaluated annually for at least 3 years. The initial diagnosis was verified or refuted by autopsy or by information obtained in subsequent evaluations. Initial neuropsychological test scores of verified AD patients were compared with those of NC subjects to identify effective diagnostic measures. RESULTS: The diagnosis of AD was confirmed in 98 of 110 (89%) very mildly impaired patients (33/36 by autopsy, 65/74 by disease progression). The diagnosis was inaccurate in 12 patients (11%): Seven were subsequently diagnosed with other neurologic disorders, and five were ultimately found to be normal. Neuropsychological measures of delayed recall, verbal fluency, and global cognitive status (i.e., Mattis Dementia Rating Scale) provided excellent sensitivity (> or = 96%) and specificity (> or = 93%) for differentiating between very mildly impaired AD patients and NC subjects. CONCLUSIONS: When comprehensive assessment procedures are employed, AD can be diagnosed with reasonably high accuracy in very mildly impaired individuals. However, the dementia evaluation should be repeated after approximately 1 year to ensure the accuracy of the initial diagnosis.

Grundman M, Sencakova D, Jack CR, Petersen RC, Kim HT, Schultz A, Weiner MF, DeCarli C, DeKosky ST, van Dyck C, Thomas RG, Thal LJ, Anonymous00002. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA. · J Mol Neurosci. · Pubmed #12212787 No free full text.

Abstract: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is considered a transitional stage in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease; however, not all MCI patients progress to clinically defined AD or decline at identical rates. Hippocampal atrophy, as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), may be a marker for hippocampal pathology in patients with MCI and predict a more rapid deterioration to clinical AD. In this study, we used MRI data from an ongoing MCI clinical trial to determine whether MRI hippocampal volume at baseline was associated with cognitive and functional performance in MCI subjects and whether it predicted those individuals who were more likely to develop AD. We performed correlational analyses between the MRI hippocampal volumes at study entry and the subjects' concurrent performance on neuropsychological measures and clinical ratings. Larger hippocampal volume was associated with better performance on tests of memory, general cognition, and overall clinical ratings. Further analyses suggested that a smaller baseline hippocampal volume may be associated with a higher risk of developing clinical AD. As the trial is still ongoing, these results require confirmation once the trial is completed. In summary, these data suggest that MRI hippocampal volume may be a useful correlate of disease severity in MCI subjects and a prognostic indicator of subsequent AD.

Tractenberg RE, Gamst A, Thomas RG, Patterson M, Schneider LS, Thal LJ. · Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego 92093-0949, USA. · J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #12154155 links to  free full text

Abstract: These retrospective analyses represent a pilot study of a potential new outcome, expected emergence. The Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia (BRSD) was administered at the baseline and 12-month visits of a multicenter study. The authors computed the rates at which each BRSD symptom emerged over 12 months in normal elderly control subjects (n=64). These normal rates were then applied as the expected emergent rate (EER) to a population of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (n=235). The comparison of expected emergence to observed emergence in Alzheimer's disease showed interpretable differences. EER assesses whether treatments limit emergence in the target, relative to the standard, population. The ratio of expected to observed emergence provides an intuitively appealing quantification of treatment efficacy and can be used with any instrument that uses categorical or frequency ratings.

Weiner MF, Tractenberg RE, Jin S, Gamst A, Thomas RG, Koss E, Thal LJ. · Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA. · J Psychiatr Res. · Pubmed #11755457 No free full text.

Abstract: We explored the applicability of the standard scoring of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), a widely used nursing-home derived instrument, to community-dwelling persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Item responses to the CMAI were gathered from participants in two large clinical studies, one of which specifically included patients with behavioral disturbances. Confirmatory factor analysis in these two groups of well-characterized AD patients suggested that conventional CMAI subscoring did not adequately describe the responses of these two groups. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the four CMAI subscores, based on a verbal-physical and aggressive-non-aggressive conceptualization of behavioral disturbance, did not fit community dwelling persons with AD. Based on cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, there was suggestive evidence for three behavioral clusters, but these clusters did not achieve statistical significance Overall, the CMAI seemed best suited to describe the overall level rather than the specific subtypes of behavioral dyscontrol in community-dwelling persons with AD.

Tractenberg RE, Gamst A, Weiner MF, Koss E, Thomas RG, Teri L, Thal L. · Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study and Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego 92093-0949, USA. · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11571769 No free full text.

Abstract: This study describes two well-characterized groups of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with similar levels of cognitive functioning, but with different overall behavioral disturbance levels. We sought to determine the nature of this difference-whether AD patients with higher levels of behavioral disturbance (n = 148) differ from less disturbed AD patients (n = 235) in terms of (a) the range of symptoms exhibited, (b) the frequency of occurrence of these symptoms, or (c) both of these. We defined and operationalized 'diversity of behaviors' and 'frequency' with respect to the item-level responses on the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI). We found that, in these two samples of AD patients, differences occurred in the frequency of 10 out of 21 behaviors, rather than in a variety of endorsed behaviors. These 10 behaviors, observed at different frequencies in both groups, may be useful for monitoring change in studies of drugs or behavioral interventions for behavioral disturbance in persons with AD.

Tractenberg RE, Jin S, Patterson M, Schneider LS, Gamst A, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0949, USA. · J Am Geriatr Soc. · Pubmed #11083327 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To identify clinically meaningful change in longitudinal assessment. DESIGN: A novel approach that qualifies item-level change over time by the degree to which it is clinically meaningful. SETTING: The classification method was tested by applying it to changes over 12 months in the frequency ratings of the items of a behavioral assessment instrument that is used commonly in clinical trials with Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. PARTICIPANTS: Responses from a cohort of 235 well characterized, community-dwelling subjects with AD were analyzed by this method. MEASUREMENTS: The approach allowed us to describe the proportions of items that emerged, ceased, worsened, and improved between the baseline and 12-month visits. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: One-year change in the behavioral symptoms of persons with AD was used to exemplify the methodology. This approach can be used in other populations and with other measurements and was designed for analyses of clinical trial data. This method uses item-level changes to generate global impressions of clinically meaningful change; it also facilitates the definition of change that can be used in the clinical setting.

Tractenberg RE, Patterson M, Weiner MF, Teri L, Grundman M, Thomas RG, Thal LJ. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego 92093-0949, USA. · J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #11083164 links to  free full text

Abstract: The authors sought to define "abnormal" levels for total scores on the CERAD Behavioral Rating Scale for Dementia (BRSD) and for 37 BRSD items by comparing 242 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 64 normal elderly control subjects (NEC). BRSD total scores for NEC ranged as high as 52 (out of a maximum 167), and although item prevalence rates were higher for AD patients, not all of these differences were significant. Many symptoms were observed in < or = 10% of AD subjects. Lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores were not consistently associated with lower or higher levels of endorsement across all items. Over 6 and 12 months, endorsement rates were relatively stable for both groups. The authors conclude that assessment of behavior in long-term studies will be needed to quantify "abnormal" levels, and that item-level BRSD information could be important in clinical trials.