Alzheimer Disease: Tariska P

Waldemar G, Dubois B, Emre M, Georges J, McKeith IG, Rossor M, Scheltens P, Tariska P, Winblad B, Anonymous00263. · Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. · Eur J Neurol. · Pubmed #17222085 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this international guideline on dementia was to present a peer-reviewed evidence-based statement for the guidance of practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists, and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with dementia. It covers major aspects of diagnostic evaluation and treatment, with particular emphasis on the type of patient often referred to the specialist physician. The main focus is Alzheimer's disease, but many of the recommendations apply to dementia disorders in general. The task force working group considered and classified evidence from original research reports, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews, published before January 2006. The evidence was classified and consensus recommendations graded according to the EFNS guidance. Where there was a lack of evidence, but clear consensus, good practice points were provided. The recommendations for clinical diagnosis, blood tests, neuroimaging, electroencephalography (EEG), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, genetic testing, tissue biopsy, disclosure of diagnosis, treatment of Alzheimer's disease, and counselling and support for caregivers were all revised when compared with the previous EFNS guideline. New recommendations were added for the treatment of vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies, for monitoring treatment, for treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia, and for legal issues. The specialist physician plays an important role together with primary care physicians in the multidisciplinary dementia teams, which have been established throughout Europe. This guideline may contribute to the definition of the role of the specialist physician in providing dementia health care.

Waldemar G, Dubois B, Emre M, Scheltens P, Tariska P, Rossor M. · Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. · Eur J Neurol. · Pubmed #10809933 No free full text.

Abstract: In 1998 a task force to develop guidelines for diagnostic evaluation and treatment of dementia was initiated by the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) scientist panel on dementia. The aims of the task force were to provide evidence-based recommendations and to highlight the role of the neurologist in the management of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other disorders associated with dementia. We based our recommendations on a review of available evidence-based guidelines supplemented with further literature reviews. The recommendations were derived from consensus meetings and relate to individual patient management, as there are inadequate data on the cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic evaluations and treatments for dementia. Their specific applications will depend upon available resources. The particular contributions of the neurologist include: early identification and differential diagnosis of rare and common brain disorders causing cognitive and behavioural symptoms, referral for and interpretation of ancillary investigations, and identification and treatment of vascular and other concurrent diseases. A review of the management of dementia in Europe revealed considerable variation. In some countries neurologists have taken the lead in the management of patients with dementia, while in other countries the neurologist is rarely involved. We recommend that neurologists should have a clear role in the management of dementia in the whole of Europe. They should be involved in the diagnostic evaluation of dementia and facilitate the development of multidisciplinary teams for evaluation and management of patients with cognitive disturbances. The increasing role of neurology in the management of patients with dementia has important implications for training and education.

Tariska P, Paksy A. · Memória Klinika, Országos Pszichiátriai és Neurológiai Intézet, Budapest. · Orv Hetil. · Pubmed #10853348 No free full text.

Abstract: Effectiveness and tolerability of two piracetam-containing drugs were compared in the frame of an open, multicentre, Phase-IV, prospective study with group and self control carried out in 9 Hungarian centres in 1998. Patients with cognitive decline from Alzheimer's disease and/or cerebrovascular origin have received the drug, in the first 4 weeks in 4800, later 2400 mg daily doses. One hundred four patients finished the study. No relevant difference with statistically significant degree was registered between the two groups. Based on this fact in this study data of the 104 patients were examined together. Authors examined two problems. The first: on which cognitive function is more effective the drug. Five factors of the modified Mini-Mental State Examination were separated and compared. Nearly all of them significantly increased especially the factors of memory, and concentration-psychomotor speed. The second examined field: are there certain subgroups with prognostic value about the effectiveness of piracetam treatment. Neither the duration of the illness, nor etiologic diagnosis, severity of cognitive decline, or former treatment with piracetam did influence significantly the efficacy. In case of depressive symptoms such connection was established: the more pronounced the severity of these symptoms the higher improvement can be expected in cognitive functions. This was also stressed by the logistic regression analysis. Authors described an original evaluation method of the trail-making test, which could widen the application of this popular test in psychopharmacologic studies. Final conclusions: the cognitive enhancer effect of piracetam appeared in a few weeks. This treatment could be effective even in Alzheimer's disease, in case of more pronounced cognitive decline, longer duration of the illness, and in case of former piracetam treatment as well. The degree of cognitive improvement was most pronounced in patients with comorbid depressive symptoms.