Alzheimer Disease: Lechner A

Schmidt R, Alf C, Bancher C, Benke T, Berek K, Dal-Bianco P, Führwürth G, Imarhiagbe D, Jagsch C, Lechner A, Rainer M, Reisecker F, Rotaru J, Uranüs M, Walter A, Winkler A, Wuschitz A. · Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Universität Graz. · Neuropsychiatr. · Pubmed #19272293 No free full text.

Abstract: We performed a 6-month open-label study on the use of the transdermal rivastigmine patch in clinical routine in 103 patients with Alzheimer's disease from 25 outpatient services in Austria. After baseline, safety and tolerability of the 10 cm2--rivastigmine patch was assessed at week 4, 12 and 24 in all patients. A Mini Mental State Examination was done at baseline and at week 12 and 24. Skin adherence of the patch was very good or good in 85% of study participants. Only 2.9% of patients had gastrointestinal adverse events. Local skin reactions occurred in 23% of individuals. Skin alteration were mostly mild in severity. In only 6.8% of subjects did they result in termination of treatment. At the earliest skin reactions were observed after 3 months of treatment. Cognitive functioning of patients improved comparable to the controlled trial which led to approval of the rivastigmine patch. In daily routine the safety profile of the rivastigmine patch is favourable, as is the response to treatment. Local, mostly mild skin reactions affect approximately every fifth patient, and they occur relatively late in the course of therapy. Patients and their caregivers should receive detailed information about skin reactions to omit unnecessary drop outs to treatment.

Schmidt R, Lechner A, Petrovic K. · Department of Neurology, Karl Franzens University Graz, Austria. · Int Clin Psychopharmacol. · Pubmed #11890189 No free full text.

Abstract: We performed an open-label study in Alzheimer patients on the use of rivastigmine in clinical routine. We evaluated the mode of dosing, safety and response to treatment over 24 weeks in 529 Alzheimer patients recruited by 114 neurologists. At the start of the study, and after 12 and 24 weeks, the participants were tested with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Global Deterioration Scale. Titration of rivastigmine was slower than expected: After 2 weeks, only 41.8% of subjects received an effective daily dose of at least 6 mg. A total of 33.8% of patients experienced 305 mostly transient adverse events of mild or moderate intensity. Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 30.4% of subjects and symptoms of the nervous system in 16.4%. Similar to controlled trials, the cognitive performance of patients improved, with more than 60% of subjects showing improvement from baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination by week 24. More than 40% of patients showed improvement on the Global Deterioration Scale. This study suggests that, in daily clinical practice, titration of rivastigmine deviates from the prescribing information. Under routine conditions, the safety profile of the drug is favourable, as is the response to treatment.