| 2 |
Clinical Conference [Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing home residents with dementia] 2005
Koczy P, Klie T, Kron M, Bredthauer D, Rissmann U, Branitzki S, Guerra V, Klein A, Pfundstein T, Nikolaus T, Sander S, Becker C. · Klinik für Geriatrische Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Tübingen, Auerbachstrasse 110, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany. · Z Gerontol Geriatr. · Pubmed #15756485 No free full text.
Abstract: At present, observational studies and expert opinion are the best evidence for the use of physical restraints. Large regional and national disparities are described in acute and long-term care. Epidemiological data demonstrate a prevalence of 3-5% body-fixed or near body restraint devices. The hip fracture rate in Germany are approximately 50 per 1000 resident years. Between 40-50% of the residents in nursing homes are treated with psycho-tropic medication potentially limiting their physical mobility. The presented study protocol was designed to test the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in long-term care (LTC) residents particularly with cognitive impairment. The intervention consists of an educational and an organizational part to empower staff members to improve their skills and practice in using restraints. Technical devices to reduce fall related injuries are additionally offered to the LTC facilities. The study population includes 200 LTC residents in 54 facilities in three states in Germany. The sample size calculation was based upon a 5% prevalence rate in the control group and an expected reduction of 50% in the intervention group. The protocol is a waiting-list control design. All waiting facilities will be offered to participate after their waiting period. Primary endpoints are the number of restrained residents and resident time (hours) of being restrained. The use of psychotropics, falls, fall-related injuries and the incidence of residents newly being restrained is being monitored. The study starts with a baseline documentation of all facilities followed by randomization and a three month intervention. Change agents will be responsible for the intervention. Technical devices will include a newly developed soft hip protector and sensor mats which notice the intent of leaving the bed. The aim of the study is to develop an evidence-based model for a knowledge transfer project to implement minimum restraint environments in LTC.
|
| 4 |
Article [Managing patients with dementia--current status and formulating dementia policy desiderata and options ] 2002
Klie T, Schmidt R. · Evangelische Fachhochschule Freiburg Bugginger Strasse 38 79114 Freiburg. · Z Gerontol Geriatr. · Pubmed #12219705 No free full text.
Abstract: The demographic and epidemiological scenarios, concerning persons with dementia, are in tension between the legal general conditions of care, on the one hand, and the conceptual alignment, on the other hand; this tension is hardly resolved by the momentary activities in health and care policy. Even on the level of assessment, there are scarcely any instruments to picture the specific needs of patients with dementia. Concepts of supply for persons with dementia are widely still divided by the differentiation between stationary and outpatient. Intelligent mixtures and paradigmatic reorientation towards normalization or split responsibility have not yet enfolded their embossing effects in practice. The care of persons with dementia is in many respects still bound in pre-technical constellations: this applies to the conceptual bias inside an institution or service of old people's care, to legal and economical general conditions and instruments of control and in many ways also to the technical discourse. The relevancy of attendance of people with dementia today and in the future justifies talking about "dementia policy". Options for dementia policy lay in a consequent adaptation of the theory of the New Welfare Mix, which was developed by the political sciences, including discussion about normalization in the area of help for disabled people and in the reformulation of competence between the means of fringe benefits and employees' benefits in joint responsibility.
|