Alzheimer Disease: Jeandel C

Vellas B, Gauthier S, Allain H, Andrieu S, Aquino JP, Berrut G, Berthel M, Blanchard F, Camus V, Dartigues JF, Dubois B, Forette F, Franco A, Gonthier R, Grand A, Hervy MP, Jeandel C, Joel ME, Jouanny P, Lebert F, Michot P, Montastruc JL, Nourhashemi F, Ousset PJ, Pariente J, Rigaud AS, Robert P, Ruault G, Strubel D, Touchon J, Verny M, Vetel JM, Anonymous00344. · CHU Casselardit, Toulouse. · Rev Neurol (Paris). · Pubmed #16244574 No free full text.

Abstract: Under the auspices of the French Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics, a multidisciplinary team including geriatritians, neurologists, epidemiologists, psychiatrists, pharmacologists and public health specialists developed a consensus on care for patients with severe dementia. They defined 21 recommendations for general practitioners, long-term care physicians and specialists based on knowledge available in 2005. At all stages of the disease, the objective of care is to improve as much as possible quality-of-life for the patient and his/her family, including a life project until the end of life. It is always possible to do something for these patients and their family: nutritional status, behavior disorders, and incapacities to deal with basic activities of daily life have to be taken in consideration. Resource allocation and proximity care have to be targeted. Research areas necessary to improve the care of patients with severe dementia has been selected.

Gillette Guyonnet S, Abellan Van Kan G, Andrieu S, Barberger Gateau P, Berr C, Bonnefoy M, Dartigues JF, de Groot L, Ferry M, Galan P, Hercberg S, Jeandel C, Morris MC, Nourhashemi F, Payette H, Poulain JP, Portet F, Roussel AM, Ritz P, Rolland Y, Vellas B. · Service de Medecine Interne et de Gerontologie Clinique, Pavillon J.P. Junod, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Grave-Casselardit, Toulouse cedex 9, France. · J Nutr Health Aging. · Pubmed #17435956 No free full text.

Abstract: Cognitive impairment can be influenced by a number of factors. The potential effect of nutrition has become a topic of increasing scientific and public interest. In particular, there are arguments that nutrients (food and/or supplements) such as vitamins, trace minerals, lipids, can affect the risk of cognitive decline and dementia, especially in frail elderly people at risk of deficiencies. Our objective in this paper is to review data relating diet to risk of cognitive decline and dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease (AD). We chose to focus our statements on homocysteine-related vitamins (B-vitamins), antioxidant nutrients (vitamins E and C, carotenoids, flavonoids, enzymatic cofactors) and dietary lipids. Results of epidemiological studies may sometimes appeared conflicting; however, certain associations are frequently found. High intake of saturated and trans-unsaturated (hydrogenated) fats were positively associated with increased risk of AD, whereas intake of polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats were protective against cognitive decline in the elderly in prospective studies. Fish consumption has been associated with lower risk of AD in longitudinal cohort studies. Moreover, epidemiologic data suggest a protective role of the B-vitamins, especially vitamins B9 and B12, on cognitive decline and dementia. Finally, the results on antioxidant nutrients may suggest the importance of having a balanced combination of several antioxidant nutrients to exert a significant effect on the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia, while taking into account the potential adverse effects of these nutrients. There is no lack of attractive hypotheses to support research on the relationships between nutrition and cognitive decline. It is important to stress the need to develop further prospective studies of sufficiently long duration, including subjects whose diet is monitored at a sufficiently early stage or at least before disease or cognitive decline exist. Meta analyses should be developed, and on the basis of their results the most appropriate interventional studies can be planned. These studies must control for the greatest number of known confounding factors and take into account the impact of the standard social determinants of food habits, such as the regional cultures, social status, and educational level.

Vellas B, Gauthier S, Allain H, Andrieu S, Aquino JP, Berrut G, Berthel M, Blanchard F, Camus V, Dartigues JF, Dubois B, Forette F, Franco A, Gonthier R, Grand A, Hervy MP, Jeandel C, Joel ME, Jouanny P, Lebert F, Michot P, Montastruc JL, Nourhashemi F, Ousset PJ, Pariente J, Rigaud AS, Robert P, Ruault G, Strubel D, Touchon J, Verny M, Vetel JM. · No affiliation provided · J Nutr Health Aging. · Pubmed #16222399 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Blain H, Jouzeau JY, Blain A, Terlain B, Tréchot P, Touchon J, Netter P, Jeandel C. · Service de Médicine interne-Gériatrie C, Centre de Gérontologie Médicale Antonin Balmes, CHU de Montpellier. · Presse Med. · Pubmed #10701410 No free full text.

Abstract: POSSIBLE INFLAMMATORY MECHANISMS: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative disease of the brain including possibly inflammatory mechanisms, as illustrated by the presence of activated microglial cells in the periphery of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles and the subsequent release of proinflammatory mediators with neurotoxic potency. RATIONALE FOR NSAID USE: Although not firmly demonstrated, the rationale for the prescription of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) as neuroprotective agents in AD lies on epidemiological data having shown a reduced risk of developing AD in patients on long-term therapy with NSAIDs (non selective cyclo-oxygenase [COX] inhibitors). RATIONALE FOR THE USE OF SELECTIVE COX-2 INHIBITORS: The rationale for the prescription of selective COX-2 inhibitors as neuroprotective drugs in AD lies on: Epidemiological data having shown a reduced risk of developing AD in patients treated with anti-inflammatory doses of classical NSAIDs (inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2) but not with antithrombotic doses of aspirin (selective inhibition of COX-1), Cellular experiments, Demonstration of a better gastro-intestinal (GI) safety profile with selective COX-2 inhibitors than with classical NSAIDs in short-term studies, allowing a possible long-term use in AD. BEFORE PRESCRIBING: COX-2 may have an ambivalent functionality in the brain since the basal production of prostaglandins through COX-2 may participate in neuronal homeostasis whereas the expression of COX-2 is associated with brain development. Classical NSAIDs are ineffective in reducing the formation of senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangles in AD, which is consistent with an ability to reduce inflammation associated with activation of microglia but illustrates their failure to suppress the degenerative process. Prophylactic use of selective COX-2 NSAIDs can be considered on the basis of their good GI safety after 6 months of marketing in United States but need to be confirmed for a longer time. CURRENT TRIALS: Clinical studies focusing on both the prevention and the slowing down of early AD are under way with two recently launched selective COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib.

De Deyn PP, Carrasco MM, Deberdt W, Jeandel C, Hay DP, Feldman PD, Young CA, Lehman DL, Breier A. · Department of Neurology, Middelheim Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #14758577 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Psychotic symptoms and behavioral disturbances are a concern in the care of elderly patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of olanzapine versus placebo in patients with psychotic symptoms associated with AD in long-term or continuing-care settings. METHODS: Patients (n = 652) with AD and delusions or hallucinations were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo or fixed-dose olanzapine (1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 mg/day). RESULTS: Mean age was 76.6+/-10.4 years. Repeated-measures analysis showed significant improvement from baseline in NPI/NH Psychosis Total scores (sum of Delusions, Hallucinations items-primary efficacy measure) in all five treatment groups (p<0.001), but no pairwise treatment differences were seen at the 10-week endpoint. However, under LOCF analysis, improvement in the 7.5 mg olanzapine group (-6.2 +/- 4.9) was significantly greater than with placebo (-5.0 +/- 6.1, p = 0.008), while endpoint CGI-C scores showed the greatest improvement in the Olz 2.5 olanzapine group (2.8 +/- 1.4, p = 0.030) relative to placebo (3.2 +/- 1.4). There were significant overall treatment-group differences in increased weight, anorexia, and urinary incontinence, with olanzapine showing numerically higher incidences. However, neither the incidence of any other individual events, including extrapyramidal symptoms, nor of total adverse events occurred with significantly higher frequency in any olanzapine group relative to placebo. No clinically relevant significant changes were seen across groups in cognition or any other vital sign or laboratory measure, including glucose, triglyceride, and cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: While 1.0 mg olanzapine did not show significant differences from placebo, the 2.5 mg dose was a reasonable starting dose. Olanzapine at 7.5 mg/day significantly decreased psychosis and overall behavioral disturbances (NPI/NH, BPRS) and was well tolerated.

Gillette Guyonnet S, Abellan Van Kan G, Andrieu S, Aquino JP, Arbus C, Becq JP, Berr C, Bismuth S, Chamontin B, Dantoine T, Dartigues JF, Dubois B, Fraysse B, Hergueta T, Hanaire H, Jeandel C, Lagleyre S, Lala F, Nourhashemi F, Ousset PJ, Portet F, Ritz P, Robert P, Rolland Y, Sanz C, Soto M, Touchon J, Vellas B. · Gerontopole, Pole Geriatrie Gerontologie, Hopital La Grave-Casselardit, Toulouse. · J Nutr Health Aging. · Pubmed #18810298 No free full text.

Abstract: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent form of dementia and according to the most recent estimation it affects nearly 27 million people in the world. The onset of the disease is generally insidious. It is becoming increasingly evident that the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are active long before the appearance of the clinical symptoms of the disease. In the current context, it is important to develop strategies to delay the onset of cognitive decline. Delaying the onset by 5 years would reduce the prevalence by half at term, and a delay of 10 years would reduce it by three-quarters. The effectiveness of currently suggested preventive approaches remains to be confirmed, but certain strategies could be applied straight away to at-risk subjects. We propose that a health-promoting memory consultation should be set up for elderly persons who have attended a specialized memory consultation and in whom the diagnosis of dementia and of AD in particular, has not been established by standardized tools. Through this consultation, they would be offered full multidimensional investigation of all aspects of their health status, follow-up could be organized, general practitioners in private practice could be made more conscious of this population and the elderly could be made more aware of the risk factors to which they are exposed. The development of an information policy for the elderly would meet a present need. In our reflection, we must take into account the question of how to give this preventive consultation its due place in the healthcare pathway of the elderly person in order to ensure coordinated follow-up with all the other health professionals involved. The principle of the health-promoting memory consultation is undergoing validation in a large French multicentre preventive trial in 1200 frail elderly persons aged 70 years followed for three years, the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT).