Alzheimer Disease: Iakovidou V

Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, Tsolaki M, Holt FE. · Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Wolfson College, Linton Road, Oxford, UK, OX2 6UD. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #19370562 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the commonest cause of dementia affecting older people. One of the therapeutic strategies aimed at ameliorating the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease is to enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in relevant parts of the brain by the use of cholinesterase inhibitors to delay the breakdown of acetylcholine released into synaptic clefts. Tacrine, the first of the cholinesterase inhibitors to undergo extensive trials for this purpose, was associated with significant adverse effects including hepatotoxicity. Other cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine, with superior properties in terms of specificity of action and low risk of adverse effects, have now been introduced. Rivastigmine has received approval for use in 60 countries including all member states of the European Union and the USA. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of rivastigmine for patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS were searched on 27 March 2008 using the terms: Rivastigmine OR exelon OR ENA OR "SDZ ENA 713" . The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from all major health care databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS) as well as from many clinical trials registries and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized trials in which treatment with rivastigmine was administered to patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type for more than two weeks and its effects compared with those of placebo in a parallel group of patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer (JSB) applied study selection criteria, assessed the quality of studies and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials, involving 4775 participants, were included in the analyses. Use of rivastigmine in high doses was associated with statistically significant benefits on several measures. High-dose rivastigmine (6 to 12 mg daily) was associated with a two-point improvement in cognitive function on the ADAS-Cog score compared with placebo (weighted mean difference -1.99, 95% confidence interval -2.49 to -1.50, on an intention-to-treat basis) and a 2.2 point improvement in activities of daily living assessed on the Progressive Deterioration Scale (weighted mean difference -2.15, 95% confidence interval -3.16 to -1.13, on an intention-to-treat basis) at 26 weeks. At lower doses (4 mg daily or lower) differences were in the same direction but were statistically significant only for cognitive function. There were statistically significantly higher numbers of events of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, headache, syncope, abdominal pain and dizziness among patients taking high-dose rivastigmine than among those taking placebo. There was some evidence that adverse events might be less common with more frequent, smaller doses of rivastigmine. The 2008 update includes a new study testing two types of rivastigmine transdermal patch, one delivering a higher dose than previously tested (17.4 mg/day) and a smaller patch delivering 9.6 mg/day. The efficacy of the smaller patch was not significantly different compared with the capsules of similar daily dose, but was associated with significantly fewer adverse events of nausea, vomiting, dizziness and asthenia. The efficacy of the larger patch was not significantly different compared with the smaller patch, but the smaller patch was associated with significantly fewer adverse events of nausea, vomiting, weight loss and dizziness. There appears to be advantages associated with the smaller patch compared with both the higher dose patch and the 6-12 mg/day capsules. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Rivastigmine appears to be beneficial for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. In comparisons with placebo, improvements were seen in the rate of decline of cognitive function, activities of daily living, and severity of dementia with daily doses of 6 to 12 mg. Adverse events were consistent with the cholinergic actions of the drug. A transdermal patch has been tested in one trial, and there is evidence that the lower dose smaller patch is associated with fewer side effects than the capsules or the higher dose larger patch and has comparable efficacy to both. This review has not examined economic data.

Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, Tsolaki M. · Department of Clinical Geratology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #11034705 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the commonest cause of dementia affecting older people. One of the therapeutic strategies aimed at ameliorating the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease is to enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in relevant parts of the brain by the use of cholinesterase inhibitors to delay the breakdown of acetylcholine released into synaptic clefts. Tacrine, the first of the cholinesterase inhibitors to undergo extensive trials for this purpose, was associated with significant adverse effects including hepatotoxicity. Several other cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine, with superior properties in terms of specificity of action and low risk of adverse effects, have now been introduced. Rivastigmine has received approval for use in 60 countries including all member States of the European Union and the USA. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of rivastigmine for patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (April 2000) the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Register of Clinical Trials (July 2000), other electronic databases and other sources of reports were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized trials in which treatment with rivastigmine was administered to patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type for more than two weeks and its effects compared with those of placebo in a parallel group of patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer (JSB) applied study selection criteria, assessed the quality of studies and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Seven trials, involving 3370 participants, were included. Use of rivastigmine in high doses was associated with statistically significant benefits on several measures. High-dose rivastigmine (6 to 12 mg daily) was associated with a 2.1 point improvement in cognitive function on the ADAS-Cog score compared with placebo (weighted mean difference -2.09, 95% confidence interval -2.65 to -1.54, on an intention-to-treat basis) and a 2.2 point improvment in activities of daily living assessed on the Progressive Deterioration Scale (weighted mean difference -2.15, 95% confidence interval -3.16 to -1.13, on an intention-to-treat basis) at 26 weeks. Fewer patients were graded as having severe dementia at 26 weeks (55% of patients taking rivastigmine compared with 59% on placebo; odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.94). At lower doses (4 mg daily or lower) differences were in the same direction but were statistically significant only for cognitive function. There were statistically significantly higher numbers of events of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, headache, syncope, abdominal pain and dizziness among patients taking high-dose rivastigmine than among those taking placebo. There was some evidence that adverse events might be less common with more frequent, smaller doses of rivastigmine. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Rivastigmine appears to be beneficial for people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. In comparisons with placebo, improvements were seen in cognitive function, activities of daily living, and severity of dementia with daily doses of 6 to 12 mg. Adverse events were consistent with the cholinergic actions of the drug. Further resarch is desirable on dosage (frequency and quanitity) in a search for ways to minimize adverse effects. This review has not examined economic data.

Birks J, Iakovidou V, Tsolaki M. · Department of Geratology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #10796621 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly. One of the most successful therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease has been the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors to enhance surviving cholinergic neurotransmission by inhibiting breakdown of released acetylcholine. The first generation acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as tacrine, revealed major limitations to use including hepatotoxicity. Several second generation acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have now been introduced, including rivastigmine, which are believed to have superior proprieties. The mode of action and metabolism of rivastigmine suggest that it is unlikely to interact significantly with other medications. This is of particular relevance in elderly AD patients, the majority of whom are likely to be receiving concomitant medication. Large multi-centre trials have been completed in the USA, Canada, Europe and South Africa. Rivastigmine has received EU approval for use in all member states. It has approval in 30 countries but not the US. It is currently under review by the Food and Drug Administration, who requested additional analyses in 1998. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of rivastigmine for patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Dementia Group Register of Clinical Trials, other electronic databases and other sources of reports were searched using the terms ENA 713, EXELON, and rivastigmine in addition to the terms for controlled trials in dementia (see the Group's search strategy for full details). SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomised trials in which treatment with rivastigmine was administered for more than one day and compared to placebo for patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by the reviewer (JSB) and entered into an appropriate meta-analysis. The data extracted were cross-checked by the second reviewer (VI). For each outcome measure, data were sought on every patient randomised. To allow an intention-to-treat analysis, the data were sought irrespective of compliance, whether or not the patient was subsequently deemed ineligible, or otherwise excluded from treatment or follow-up. If these data were not available, an analysis of data on patients who completed treatment was conducted. MAIN RESULTS: There are seven included trials. There are no published reports for two large phase III trials, B304 and B351, although they were completed more than 3 years ago. These are part of the Novartis ADENA programme and comprise 1379 (49%) out of 2803 phase III patients. It is unclear how missing data are replaced in ITT analyses, as reports from the ADENA programme provide no description of the use of this method. This has a profound effect on the results: if the method is substantially the same as LOCF, the benefits of treatment inferred from the analyses described in the publications as ITT, may be exaggerated. The meta-analysis reveals benefits on cognitive function as measured by ADAS-Cog test scores for the higher dose of rivastigmine compared to placebo at 26 weeks and for the lower dose. An additional analysis of ADAS-Cog dichotomised into those showing less than 4 points improvement and those showing 4 or more points improvement at 26 weeks shows benefit for cognitive function for the higher dose of rivastigmine compared to placebo and not for the lower dose. Global clinical state, dichotomised, counting those showing no change or decline, against those showing improvement shows benefit due to lower dose rivastigmine compared to placebo at 26 weeks and not for the higher dose. One trial reported results at 18 weeks and there are no significant differences between higher dose rivastigmine and placebo. One trial reported results at 13 weeks, and there are no significant differences between the 4 or 6 mg/d rivastigmine group and p

Wollmer MA, Streffer JR, Lütjohann D, Tsolaki M, Iakovidou V, Hegi T, Pasch T, Jung HH, Bergmann K, Nitsch RM, Hock C, Papassotiropoulos A. · Division of Psychiatry Research, University of Zürich, August Forel Street 1, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland. · Neurobiol Aging. · Pubmed #12600718 No free full text.

Abstract: Increased formation of the beta-amyloid peptide (Abeta) is a central event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). High cellular cholesterol load promotes Abeta formation. The ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) mediates cholesterol efflux from cells. We hypothesized that genetic variability in ABCA1 may influence cholesterol metabolism in the central nervous system (CNS) and, thus, interfere with the development of AD. Healthy elderly carriers of the A allele of a non-synonymous (R219K) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the ABCA1 gene (rs2234884) had on average 33% lower total cholesterol in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than non-carriers. In 169 patients with late onset, sporadic AD, this allele was associated with delayed age at onset of the disease by 1.7 years on average. Rs2234884 and another non-synonymous SNP (R1587K) in ABCA1 (rs2234886) failed to show significant association with the risk for AD. We conclude that genetic variability of ABCA1 influences the development of AD, possibly by interfering with CNS cholesterol homeostasis.

Streffer JR, Papassotiropoulos A, Kurosinski P, Signorell A, Wollmer MA, Tsolaki M, Iakovidou V, Hörndli F, Bosset J, Götz J, Nitsch RM, Hock C. · Division of Psychiatry Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland. · J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12588928 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The deposition of tau protein in neurofibrillary tangles constitutes an important feature of many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. A polymorphic gene, saitohin (STH), nested within the tau gene (microtubule associated protein tau, MAPT), was recently identified and an association of a non-synonymous polymorphism in STH with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease was suggested. Objective and methods: To test the above hypothesis in a case-control association study of two independent white populations within Switzerland and Greece, comparing genotype and allele frequencies from 225 Alzheimer's disease patients and 144 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: No differences in allelic or genotypic distributions between Alzheimer's disease patients and controls was found in the individual samples (Swiss/Greek) or in the combined sample. Stratification for the presence of apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4 allele, sex, or age did not show significant effects in the populations studied, nor was there an effect on the age of onset. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found for an association of the non-synonymous polymorphism (Q7R) in STH and Alzheimer's disease. This finding is in line with earlier studies showing no association between MAPT and Alzheimer's disease.

Papassotiropoulos A, Streffer JR, Tsolaki M, Schmid S, Thal D, Nicosia F, Iakovidou V, Maddalena A, Lütjohann D, Ghebremedhin E, Hegi T, Pasch T, Träxler M, Brühl A, Benussi L, Binetti G, Braak H, Nitsch RM, Hock C. · Division of Pychiatry Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #12533085 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: CYP46, the gene encoding cholesterol 24-hydroxylase, plays a key role in the hydroxylation of cholesterol and thereby mediates its removal from brain. OBJECTIVE: To study the association of polymorphic sites on CYP46 with Alzheimer disease (AD) traits and with the risk of the development of AD. DESIGN: Alzheimer disease traits (beta-amyloid load, beta-amyloid peptides, hyperphosphorylated tau protein) were assessed in brain tissues and in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with AD and control subjects. Genetic associations were studied in 2 independent populations. SETTING: Specialized centers for memory disorders in Switzerland, Greece, and Italy. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five brain tissues from nondemented elderly patients for the histopathological studies; 38 patients with AD and 25 control subjects for the cerebrospinal fluid studies; 201 patients with AD and 248 control subjects for the genetic association studies. RESULTS: A polymorphism of CYP46 was associated with increased beta-amyloid load in brain tissues as well as with increased cerebrospinal fluid levels of beta-amyloid peptides and phosphorylated tau protein. Moreover, this CYP46 polymorphism was associated with higher risk of late-onset sporadic AD in 2 independent populations (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.32; P<.001). The additional presence of 1 or 2 apolipoprotein E epsilon4 alleles synergistically increased the risk of AD to an odds ratio of 9.6 (95% CI, 4.9-18.9; P<.001) as compared with 4.4 for apolipoprotein E epsilon4 alone (95% CI, 2.8-6.8; P<.001). CONCLUSION: CYP46 influences brain beta-amyloid load, cerebrospinal fluid levels of beta-amyloid peptides and phosphorylated tau, and the genetic risk of late-onset sporadic AD.

Tsolaki M, Iakovidou V, Papadopoulou E, Aminta M, Nakopoulou E, Pantazi T, Kazis A. · 3rd Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital G. Papanicolaou, Greece. · Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. · Pubmed #12083343 No free full text.

Abstract: The increasing prevalence ofAlzheimer's disease (AD) suggests that there is an increasing need for accurate and easily administered screening instruments. The Seven-Minute Screen is a neurocognitive screening battery consisting of four brief tests (enhanced cued recall, temporal orientation, verbal fluency, and clock drawing). We studied 55 outpatients with probable AD, 40 healthy volunteers of comparable age, sex, and education and 31 elderly patients with other neuropsychological disorders. The aim of our study was to determine the validity and reliability of this test. Differences on individual tests were evaluated using the Student t test. (Recall: 6.4 +/- 5.02/15.38 +/- 0.95; Orientation: 48.76 +/- 42.74/0.2 +/- 0.52; Verbal: 8.2 +/- 4.94/18.05 +/- 4.63; Clock drawing: 2.07 +/- 2.56/6.03 +/- 11.25 for AD patients and control subjects, respectively). Mean scores for patients with AD and control subjects on allfour individual tests were significantly different (for each, p < 0.001). The mean time to complete the test for healthy control subjects was nine minutes and 18 seconds, for neuropsychological disorders nine minutes and six seconds, and for AD patients 13 minutes and 32 seconds (p < 0,001). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the degree to which the battery discriminated between control subjects and patients with AD (sensitivity 92.73 percent and specificity 97.50 percent). We then separated the patients with MMSE > 20 and the same model of regression analysis was used. Sensitivity was 81.25 percent and specificity was 96.55 percent using 0.7 as the cutoff probability, and 93.75 and 96.55 percent, respectively, using 0.5 as the cutoffprobability. Neither age nor education and gender had an effect on the results. The Seven-Minute Screen appears highly sensitive to AD patients and may be useful in helping to make initial distinctions between patients with early dementia and normal elderly.

Tsolaki M, Kokarida K, Iakovidou V, Stilopoulos E, Meimaris J, Kazis A. · 3rd Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece. · Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. · Pubmed #11603162 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and clinical correlates of extrapyramidal signs (EPS) in outpatients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD); to examine the appearance of EPS in association with the first symptom that led the patient or family to ask for medical help; to examine the association of the prevalence of EPS with gender, age at onset of the disease, duration of the disease, severity of dementia, functional disability, and potential use of neuroleptics; and to address the issue of the possible role of EPS as a predictive factor for the clinical course of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 126 patients meeting NINCDS-ADRDA* criteria for probable AD and 29 healthy, nondementia controls of comparable age and gender. Thirteen of the patients taking neuroleptics at the time of the examination were excluded from the main study group and formed a separate subgroup of AD/neuroleptics-positive. Twenty-eight of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients were re-examined during an 18-month period in order to determine the possible role of EPS as a predictive factor of the clinical course of the disease. RESULTS: Only 8 percent of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients were free of EPS, while the corresponding percentage in the control group was 61.5 percent. The most common types of EPS presented in the patient group were hypomimia ([facial mask] 60 percent), difficulty in talking (53.66 percent), bradykinesia (51.4 percent), postural instability (47.33 percent), abnormal gait (34.66), and rigidity (26 percent), respectively. No significant differences were found when examining for the presence of resting tremor, other tremors, dystonias, and dyskinesias. With regard to the presence of EPS and the first symptom, no significant difference was found among patients whose first complaint was memory disorder (probable AD) and patients with other symptoms. When examining the association between the prevalence of EPS and gender or age at onset of the disease, no special correlation was detected. However, such a correlation was found between the prevalence of EPS and duration of the disease, as indicated by the fact that EPS appear in 78.9 percent of the patients with a duration of illness less than two years, but in 97 percent of the patients with a corresponding duration of two years or more. The mean duration of the disease in patients appearing with EPS is found to be 2.68 +/- 1.98 years. The presence of EPS increases proportionally with the progression of the disease and cognitive and functional decline. Patients with poor results in the MMSE (score of less than 11) appear to present EPS at a greater percentage than those with better performance on the examination (MMSE scores greater than 11). With regard to the association between EPS and functional ability in AD, it seems that the presence of EPS imposes difficulties in daily activities, as seen by the fact that patients with EPS have lower FRSSD scores (mean +/- SD: 14.87 +/- 10.53) than patients without EPS (5 +/- 2.58). After controlling for duration of the disease, the use of neuroleptics is found to influence the appearance of EPS in patients with AD. Almost all of the patients AD/neuroleptics-positive patients presented EPS (100 percent), while 92 percent of the AD/neuroleptics-free patients manifested such symptoms. Finally, we re-evaluated 28 patients, who were part of the initial AD/neuroleptics-free group, in order to determine whether the appearance of EPS could have prognostic value for the clinical course of the disease. Patients who presented EPS at initial examination appeared to deteriorate faster, mainly cognitively, but also functionally. The mean decrease in MMSE scores in patients with EPS was found to be 2.65 +/- 3.46; while in patients without EPS at initial visit, MMSE scores were 0.63 +/- 3.88. The functional decline seems to be less influenced by the presence of EPS. The corresponding mean decrease in FRSSD scores of the two groups was 2.1 +/- 5.55 and 1.8 +/- 2.1, respectively.

Tsolaki M, Iakovidou V, Navrozidou H, Aminta M, Pantazi T, Kazis A. · No affiliation provided · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #10918349 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.