Alzheimer Disease: Ferris SH

Fillit HM, Doody RS, Binaso K, Crooks GM, Ferris SH, Farlow MR, Leifer B, Mills C, Minkoff N, Orland B, Reichman WE, Salloway S. · Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation and Institute for the Study of Aging New York, New York 10019, USA. · Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. · Pubmed #17157793 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) are increasingly recognized as important causes of impaired cognition, function, and quality of life, as well as excess medical care utilization and costs in the elderly Medicare managed care population. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ADRDs were published in 2001. More recent studies have resulted in the approval of new agents and demonstrated an expanded role for antidementia therapy in various types of dementia, settings of care, stages of disease, and the use of combination therapy. However, these clinical guidelines have not been updated in the past few years. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to provide practical recommendations developed by a panel of experts that address issues of early diagnosis, treatment, and care management of ADRDs. The panel also addressed the societal and managed care implications. METHODS: A panel of leading experts was convened to develop consensus recommendations for the treatment and management of dementia based on currently available evidence and the panel's informed expert opinion. The panel comprised 12 leading experts, including clinical investigators and practitioners in geriatric medicine, neurology, psychiatry, and psychology; managed care medical and pharmacy directors; a health systems medical director; and a health policy expert. In addition, articles were collected based on PubMed searches (2000-2005) that were relevant to the key issues identified. Search terms included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, clinical practice guidelines, clinical trials, screening and assessment, and managed care. RESULTS: ADRDs represent a significant clinical and economic burden to individuals and society, including Medicare managed care organizations (MCOs). Appropriate utilization of antidementia therapy and care management is vitally important to achieving quality of life and care for dementia patients and their caregivers, and for managing the excess costs of Alzheimer's disease. The recommendations address relevant, practical, and timely concerns that are faced on a daily basis by practitioners and by Medicare MCO medical management programs in the care of dementia patients. These consensus recommendations attempt to describe a reasonable current standard for the provision of quality care for patients with dementia. The panel recommendations support the use of screening for cognitive impairment and the use of antidementia therapy for ADRDs in different stages of disease and types of dementia in all clinical settings. The panel members evaluated the use of the 3 marketed cholinesterase inhibitors-donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine-as well as the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine. Recommendations for using these medications are made with an appreciation of the difficulties in translating the results from investigational clinical trials into clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations of the expert panel represent a clear consensus that nihilism in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of ADRDs is unwarranted, impairs quality of care, and is ultimately not costeffective.

Ferris SH. · No affiliation provided · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135804 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Ferris SH. · Alzheimer's Disease Center, Silberstein Institute for Ageing and Dementia, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, Room MHL 310, New York, NY 10016, USA. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #14640929 No free full text.

Abstract: Increasing evidence suggests that disturbances in glutamatergic activity play an important role in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Excessive glutamate-mediated activation of NMDA receptors, for example, may contribute to the neuronal death that characterises AD. On the other hand, physiological activation of the NMDA receptor appears necessary for normal cognitive function. Therefore, compounds that finely modulate NMDA receptor activity hold promise as treatments for AD. Memantine (Namenda, Axura, Ebixa; Forest Laboratories, Inc., Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, H. Lundbeck A/S) is a low-moderate affinity, uncompetitive NMDA-receptor antagonist that appears to block pathological, but not physiological, activation of the NMDA receptor. Consequently, therapeutic doses of the drug are well-tolerated and do not seem to interfere with the acquisition or processing of cognitive information. Memantine has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce the rate of clinical deterioration among patients with moderate-to-severe AD and was approved in the US for this indication in October 2003. This review provides a brief rationale for the development of memantine as a therapy for AD, as well as an overview of the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of this novel therapeutic agent.

Ferris SH, Yan B. · Silberstein Institute for Aging and Dementia, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #14512823 No free full text.

Abstract: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive degenerative disease that manifests as gradual deterioration in memory and cognition, behavior, and the ability to perform activities of daily living. Accurate diagnosis and continued evaluation of these aspects of AD can help guide therapy for patients in the late stage of the disease. Assessment tools specific for patients with severe AD are available for use in clinical studies.

Ferris SH. · New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #12070357 No free full text.

Abstract: Great strides have been made in the measurement of outcomes and treatment efficacy in clinical trials of Alzheimer disease (AD) drugs during the past 25 years. Several sensitive, reliable, and valid clinical outcome measures have been developed. The methodology, trial design, and outcome measures for demonstrating symptomatic benefits of an AD drug are now established. However, a greater challenge lies ahead. Major advances in fundamental knowledge about the pathophysiology of the disease and in animal models have transformed the focus of current efforts to developing and testing therapies that may actually slow disease progression, delay the onset of symptoms, and even ultimately prevent the disease. The long-duration trials that will likely be necessary to demonstrate an effect on disease progression will be costly and difficult. Proof-of-concept trials and subsequent long-term trials could gain power and efficiency from use of biologic markers of underlying disease severity, but currently available biologic markers are not ideal. A major barrier to such trials is their size and cost. One approach to reducing the cost would be to recruit "enriched" samples of subjects who are at greater risk of developing AD during the trial than the general, elderly population. The major effort required to screen and recruit large numbers of subjects for such trials also contributes to the cost. Probably the biggest problem currently is the enormous effort and cost of conducting periodic clinical evaluations to determine if subjects have declined or developed dementia. Research to develop more efficient assessment methods is clearly needed. Data acquisition over the Internet is potentially efficient and attractive and may become practical as Internet accessibility increases.

Fillit HM, O'Connell AW, Brown WM, Altstiel LD, Anand R, Collins K, Ferris SH, Khachaturian ZS, Kinoshita J, Van Eldik L, Dewey CF. · The Institute for the Study of Aging, Inc., New York, New York, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #12070355 No free full text.

Abstract: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition leading to progressive, irreversible loss of cognitive and behavioral function. Despite considerable investments in neuroscience research, only four drugs, all cholinesterase inhibitors, have been approved for the symptomatic management of AD in the United States. Although basically safe and modestly effective, these drugs are far from ideal, being neither universally efficacious nor disease modifying. AD exacts a considerable toll in direct medical costs, quality of life, and caregiver burden for persons and society. In addition to the obvious clinical benefit, therapeutic agents for AD and related dementias represent a considerable market opportunity for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. There are currently 8-10 million AD sufferers in the seven major pharmaceutical markets. The market will grow rapidly in coming decades, as the developed world experiences an enormous increase in its elderly population. Given the great need for new therapeutic agents to manage and prevent AD, the Institute for the Study of Aging and the Fidelity Foundation organized a workshop, "Barriers to the Discovery and Development of Drugs for Alzheimer's Disease," to examine ways to expedite drug discovery and development. The identified barriers and potential solutions will be discussed here and in the accompanying articles in more detail.

Ferris SH. · Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #10609693 No free full text.

Abstract: Clinical trials of antidementia drugs must use a performance-based cognitive assessment as a primary outcome measure. There are well-established criteria for selecting or developing an optimal cognitive battery for Alzheimer disease (AD) trials that also apply to vascular dementia (VaD) trials. Because there is substantial overlap between the pattern of cognitive impairment in VaD and AD, the most efficient strategy for developing a VaD battery would be to begin with a well-established AD instrument and add subtests covering the additional domains that are more prominently impaired in VaD.

Desmond DW, Erkinjuntti T, Sano M, Cummings JL, Bowler JV, Pasquier F, Moroney JT, Ferris SH, Stern Y, Sachdev PS, Hachinski VC. · Department of Neurology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #10609678 No free full text.

Abstract: Dementia is common among patients with cerebrovascular disease, particularly in a setting of one or more clinically evident strokes. Prior cohort and case studies have suggested that the cognitive syndrome of vascular dementia is characterized by predominant executive dysfunction, in contrast to the deficits in memory and language function that are typical of patients with Alzheimer disease. The course of cognitive decline may also differ between those dementia subtypes, with many, but not all, patients with vascular dementia exhibiting a stepwise course of decline caused by recurrent stroke and most patients with Alzheimer disease exhibiting a gradually progressive course of decline. The findings of prior studies of the cognitive syndrome of vascular dementia must be interpreted with caution, however, because of (1) possible inaccuracies in the determination of the dementia subtype and the loss of precision that might result from pooling heterogeneous subgroups of patients with vascular dementia, (2) difficulties inherent in identifying a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in patients who are required to have memory impairment and other deficits to meet operationalized criteria for dementia, and (3) the use of limited test batteries whose psychometric properties are incompletely understood. Specific questions that should be addressed by future studies are discussed.

Grundman M, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Thomas RG, Aisen PS, Bennett DA, Foster NL, Jack CR, Galasko DR, Doody R, Kaye J, Sano M, Mohs R, Gauthier S, Kim HT, Jin S, Schultz AN, Schafer K, Mulnard R, van Dyck CH, Mintzer J, Zamrini EY, Cahn-Weiner D, Thal LJ, Anonymous00151. · Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California-San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite 227, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #14732621 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and very early dementia and is becoming increasingly recognized as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). The Memory Impairment Study (MIS) is a multicenter clinical trial in patients with MCI designed to evaluate whether vitamin E or donepezil is effective at delaying the time to a clinical diagnosis of AD. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with MCI recruited for the MIS and compare them with those of elderly controls and patients with AD in another clinical trial. DESIGN: Descriptive and comparative study of patients with MCI participating in a multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Memory disorder centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 769 patients with MCI, 107 cognitively normal elderly controls, 122 patients with very mild AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 0.5), and 183 patients with mild AD (CDR 1.0) were evaluated. Patients in the MIS met operational criteria for amnestic MCI. Controls were recruited in parallel with the MCI group, underwent the same assessments, and had a CDR of 0. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, neuropsychologic, functional, neuroimaging, and genetic measures. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale scores were 5.6 +/- 3.3 for controls, 11.3 +/- 4.4 for patients with MCI, 18.0 +/- 6.2 for the AD CDR 0.5 group, and 25.2 +/- 8.8 for the AD CDR 1.0 group. Compared with controls, patients with MCI were most impaired on memory tasks, with less severe impairments in other cognitive domains. Patients with MCI were more likely than controls but less likely than patients with AD to carry the apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele. Patients with MCI had hippocampal volumes that were intermediate between those of controls and patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCI had a predominant memory impairment with relative sparing of other cognitive domains and were intermediate between clinically normal individuals and patients with AD on cognitive and functional ratings. These results demonstrate the successful implementation of operational criteria for this unique group of at-risk patients in a multicenter clinical trial.

Doody RS, Ferris SH, Salloway S, Sun Y, Goldman R, Watkins WE, Xu Y, Murthy AK. · Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1801, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #19176895 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with cholinesterase inhibitors may improve symptoms. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, subjects with MCI entered a 3-week placebo run-in period followed by 48 weeks of double-blind donepezil (5 mg/day for 6 weeks, then 10 mg/day for 42 weeks) or placebo treatment. Primary efficacy variables included change from baseline in the modified Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) after 48 weeks of treatment (modified intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary efficacy measures evaluated cognition, behavior, and function. RESULTS: The dual primary efficacy endpoint was not reached. We noted a small, but significant, decrease in modified ADAS-Cog scores in favor of donepezil at study endpoint. Little change from baseline in CDR-SB and secondary variables was observed for either group. Patient Global Assessment scores favored donepezil at all time points except week 12 (p < or = 0.05). Perceived Deficits Questionnaire scores favored donepezil at week 24 (p = 0.05). Clinical Global Impression of Change-MCI scores favored donepezil only at week 6 (p = 0.04). Adverse events were generally mild or moderate. More donepezil-treated subjects (18.4%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events than placebo-treated subjects (8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil demonstrated small but significant improvement on the primary measure of cognition but there was no change on the primary measure of global function. Most other measures of global impairment, cognition, and function were not improved, possibly because these measures are insensitive to change in MCI. Responses on subjective measures suggest subjects perceived benefits with donepezil treatment.

Lane R, Feldman HH, Meyer J, He Y, Ferris SH, Nordberg A, Darreh-Shori T, Soininen H, Pirttilä T, Farlow MR, Sfikas N, Ballard C, Greig NH. · Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936-1080, USA. · Pharmacogenet Genomics. · Pubmed #18334913 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the synergistic effects of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon4 and butyrylcholinesterase K-variant (BCHE-K) alleles on progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: This was a post-hoc exploratory analysis from a 3-4-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of rivastigmine in participants with MCI (InDDEx study). Participants who consented to genetic testing were included in the current analyses. The incidence of progression to AD, cognitive decline and changes in MRI brain volumes were investigated in participants from the placebo arm of the InDDEx study. RESULTS: Of the 1018 participants in the overall study, 464 were successfully genotyped for both APOE and butyrylcholinesterase. Of these, 68 (14.7%) carried > or =1 APOE epsilon4 and > or =1 BCHE-K allele. The presence of APOE epsilon4 was associated with a significantly higher incidence of progression to AD whereas the presence of BCHE-K had no independent effect on progression. A synergistic effect of the combined presence of APOE epsilon4 and BCHE-K on the time to clinical diagnosis of AD and on MRI brain volumes was seen. Progression to AD and hippocampal volumetric loss was greatest in participants who carried both APOE epsilon4 and BCHE-K alleles and lowest in BCHE-K carriers without the APOE epsilon4 allele. CONCLUSION: In MCI, the risk of cognitive decline, hippocampal volumetric loss and progression to AD seems to be the greatest in individuals who carry at least one copy of both the BCHE-K and APOE epsilon4 alleles.

Aisen PS, Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Assaid C, Nessly ML, Giuliani MJ, Lines CR, Norman BA, Potter WZ. · Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. · Curr Alzheimer Res. · Pubmed #18288935 No free full text.

Abstract: A recent clinical trial in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) found an increased rate of possible or probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnoses in patients assigned to rofecoxib compared to placebo. This unexpected finding was difficult to interpret due to methodological issues and a lack of confirmation on secondary endpoints, as well as a lack of confirmation in trials in related populations. We performed additional post hoc analyses to explore explanations for the finding based on possible neuropathological, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular, or cognitive effects of rofecoxib. 1) Neuropathological hypothesis: Of the 189 incident cases of possible or probable AD, 154 were probable AD. In probable AD patients, the treatment hazard ratio was reduced compared to the primary analysis -- a concordant finding would have strengthened a conclusion that rofecoxib accelerated the underlying neuropathology of AD. The treatment hazard ratio was increased in the remaining 35 patients with less certain diagnoses, but there was no single predominant reason for the reduced certainty of diagnosis. 2) Cardiovascular hypothesis: Neither cardiovascular risk status nor mean arterial blood pressure had an overall effect on AD diagnosis or modified the treatment difference. 3) Cognitive side-effects hypothesis: The percentages of patients with non-specific NSAID-type central nervous system adverse events were similar between the treatment groups. In summary, the present analyses are limited by their post hoc nature but provided little support for any of the possible explanations explored. The significance of the observation that rofecoxib increased the rate of conversion from MCI to AD remains uncertain.

Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Kluger A, Franssen E, Wegiel J, de Leon MJ. · Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #18031593 No free full text.

Abstract: Descriptions of dementia can be traced to antiquity. Prichard (1837) described four dementia stages and Kral (1962) described a "benign senescent forgetfulness" condition. The American Psychiatric Association's DSM-III (1980) identified an early dementia stage.In 1982, the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) were published, which identified dementia antecedents. The CDR 0.5 "questionable dementia" stage encompasses both mild dementia and earlier antecedents. GDS stage 3 described a predementia condition termed "mild cognitive decline" or, alternatively, beginning in 1988, "mild cognitive impairment" (MCI). This GDS stage 3 MCI condition is differentiated from both a preceding GDS stage 2, "subjective cognitive impairment" (SCI) stage and a subsequent GDS 4 stage of mild dementia.GDS stage 3 MCI has been well characterized. For example, specific clinical concomitants, mental status and psychological assessment score ranges, behavioral and emotional changes, neuroimaging concomitants, neurological reflex changes, electrophysiological changes, motor and coordination changes, and changes in activities, accompanying GDS stage 3 MCI have been described.Petersen and associates proposed a definition of MCI in 2001 which has been widely used (hereafter referred to as "Petersen's MCI"). Important differences between GDS stage 3 MCI and Petersen's MCI are that, because of denial, GDS stage 3 MCI does not require memory complaints. Also, GDS stage 3 MCI recognizes the occurrence of executive level functional deficits, which Petersen's MCI did not. Nevertheless, longitudinal and other studies indicate essential compatibility between GDS stage 3 MCI and Petersen's MCI duration and outcomes.

Sano M, Zhu CW, Whitehouse PJ, Edland S, Jin S, Ernstrom K, Thomas RG, Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Anonymous00342. · Mount Sinai School of Medicine, James J Peters VAMC, Bronx, NY 10468, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135812 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Prevention Instrument project of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) seeks to develop instruments to assess treatment efficacy including potential economic benefit. The Resource Use Inventory (RUI) is an instrument that has been used to capture resource utilization and costs in populations with Alzheimer disease (AD). However, resource utilization and costs for healthy, cognitively intact elderly as they begin to demonstrate cognitive deterioration are not well understood. In addition, the loss that relates to the subjects' own time as they transition through cognitive impairment is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of the RUI in a sample of cognitively intact elderly individuals living in the community and enrolled in AD prevention trials. METHODS: The RUI was administered to 644 subjects and their study partners either at home or in the clinic. For half of each sample, 3-month retesting was carried out. The RUI consisted of 9 questions. The first part of the RUI captured subjects' use of direct medical care (eg, hospitalizations) and nonmedical care (eg, home health aides). The second part of the RUI captured the time caregivers spend providing care to the subjects. The third part of the RUI captured subjects' participation in volunteer work and employment. The assessment interval for each question was the past 3 months. RESULTS: The percentage of RUI forms returned incomplete or inaccurate for both in-clinic and at-home groups was extremely low. There were no differences in utilization rates between in-clinic and at-home group for all items in the RUI. Except for use of outpatient procedures, tests, or treatments, there were no differences in utilization rates between subjects who filled out the RUI with the help of their study partners or by themselves. Items in the RUI were sensitive to subjects' cognitive and functional status and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based completion of the RUI by participants in an AD prevention study is feasible, and seems to provide data that are reliable and valid. The instrument will be useful for tracking resource and time use through transition from healthy to cognitive impairment.

Cummings JL, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Salmon D, Ferris SH, Anonymous00338. · Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135808 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for the development of inexpensive, reliable, and valid instruments that can be used in large-scale primary prevention trials of compounds aimed at ameliorating progression from normal aging to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study launched a Prevention Instrument Project to develop such methodologies. Behavioral changes are common in diseases causing dementia and may occur prior to a point when cognitive changes are sufficiently severe to allow diagnosis of a dementia syndrome. Experimental behavioral measures were included in the protocol to examine this hypothesis. METHODS: Six hundred forty-four individuals with CDR 0 or 0.5 were randomly assigned to receive a brief in-clinic behavioral assessment or telephonic administration of the same assessment. The questions were asked to the individual and their research partner. The Prevention Instrument Project included behavioral measures of depression, anxiety, irritability, and apathy. RESULTS: All measures demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability at 3-month intervals except for the single-item depression screen by the subjects' research partner. Behavioral changes are significantly more common among patients with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores of 0.5 compared with CDR scores of 0. Behavioral alterations including irritability, anxiety, and apathy are more common among ethnic minorities than among the White population. Depression, irritability, anxiety, and apathy are significantly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral changes are common among those with mild degrees of cognitive compromise (CDR 0.5). Telephonic assessment of behavioral changes is feasible. The predictive value of these alterations for progression to Alzheimer disease or other dementias will be assessed longitudinally.

Salmon DP, Cummings JL, Jin S, Sano M, Sperling RA, Zamrini E, Petersen RC, Edland SD, Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Anonymous00337. · Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0948, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135807 No free full text.

Abstract: The validity and reliability of clinic-based and telephone-based versions of a 4 word delayed recall test were evaluated in nondemented elderly individuals (n=644) participating in a simulated primary prevention clinical trial. There was no significant difference in the average scores achieved by participants tested in clinic (mean=3.40) or by telephone (mean=3.47) and the 2 groups had similar distributions of scores. Delayed recall scores were significantly, but weakly, correlated with scores on a rigorous verbal memory task, were lower in participants in Clinical Dementia Rating stage 0.5 than in those in Clinical Dementia Rating stage 0, and were lower in those with subjective memory complaints than in those without complaints. There was only fair correspondence between scores achieved at initial testing and 3 months later for both versions of the test. There were no differences in the average scores achieved by men or women, those older (age 80 to 93) or younger (age 75 to 79) than age 80, or those with white or nonwhite ethnicity. Participants with low education scored significantly lower than those with high education. Results suggest that clinic-based and telephone-based versions of the Four Word Delayed Recall Test are valid and reliable and can be used to screen for possible memory deficits in elderly individuals. However, the psychometric properties of the test are relatively weak and do not support the general use of the test for clinical and research purposes if the use of a more rigorous memory test with a wider range of possible scores is feasible.

Schneider LS, Clark CM, Doody R, Ferris SH, Morris JC, Raman R, Reisberg B, Schmitt FA. · Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135806 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Because primary prevention trials will require large samples and modest treatment effects are expected, the use of standard clinician-administered, clinic-based measures are unlikely to be feasible. There is a need for proxy-administered outcome measures. The goal of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) Prevention Instrument Project was to conduct a simulated Alzheimer disease prevention trial in 650 nondemented elderly (Ferris et al, 2006). This involved comparison of data acquisition from both home and clinic and the use of both informant-ratings and self-ratings. Important outcomes included clinical global impressions of change (CGIC) as indicators of clinically meaningful change. Such ratings provide verification that the effects of a medication as measured on rating scales are readily observable and clinically meaningful. One objective was to develop self-rated and study partner-rated CGICs optimized for nondemented elderly or people with very early Alzheimer disease. An important consideration was whether global assessments are specific and sensitive measures of change during a prevention trial. METHODS: A self-administered CGIC and a study partner-rated CGIC were developed to be used either in the clinic or at home. Using 3-month follow-up data, we determined its reliability and validity with 317 subject-partner pairs. We compared subject-ratings with partner-ratings, clinic-based with home-based ratings, and ratings based on severity as determined by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. RESULTS: There were no differences between clinic and home ratings. Overall, 24% of subjects rated themselves, and 10% of study partners rated the subjects, as minimally to markedly improved. Subjects and partners agreed to within 1 point of their ratings 83% of the time on the 7-point scale. There were weak correlations, generally <0.20, with change scores of selected clinical rating scales. DISCUSSION: The CGICs behaved as expected, showing no overall change over 3 months, no difference between administrations at home compared with clinics, and concurrent validity. Some subjects tended to rate themselves better than their partners rated them. These analyses show the potential for using home-based CGICs which can be completed with minimal supervision and allow assessments of potential preventative interventions.

Ferris SH, Aisen PS, Cummings J, Galasko D, Salmon DP, Schneider L, Sano M, Whitehouse PJ, Edland S, Thal LJ, Anonymous00336. · Alzheimer's Disease Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #17135805 No free full text.

Abstract: One objective of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) is to develop new or improved instruments and assessment methods for evaluating treatment efficacy in Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical trials. The ADCS Instrument Committee has previously helped to define the state of the art in assessment for AD and Mild Cognitive Impairment clinical trials. We are now entering an exciting era of primary prevention trials to evaluate promising treatments that may delay disease onset and there is a need to develop appropriate instruments for these trials. The ADCS instrument committee has undertaken a project to develop instruments for prevention studies that assess domains known to be important in AD. Prevention trials are long and require large numbers of subjects, making them costly and requiring a high burden of participation for subjects. The current study focused on developing instruments that can be completed at home and in the clinic. The instruments are being evaluated in a cohort of nondemented elderly participating in a 4-year longitudinal study that simulates the design of a primary prevention trial. This report describes the design, baseline characteristics, and some longitudinal outcomes of the study cohort through the completion of the first 2 years of follow-up. We also describe the assessment domains to be measured with our new experimental instruments. This study recruited 644 subjects, 75 years of age and older. Participation in a "book club" that provided free books of interest to elders was offered as a recruitment incentive. Approximately 23% had some mild cognitive symptoms consistent with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5. All subjects received a standardized in-clinic evaluation at baseline, which is repeated annually for 4 years to identify cases suspected of developing dementia and to measure longitudinal change on established clinical assessments. Subjects completed a set of self-administered experimental instruments at home or in the clinic designed to assess cognitive function and behavior, global change, activities of daily living, quality of life, and resource use. An additional "mail-in cognitive function questionnaire" was obtained separately by mail, 1 month before the other assessments. To evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and validity of the home-based instruments in comparison with acquiring the same information during a clinic visit, subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 conditions in which the baseline and annual follow-up assessments are completed either at home ("home group") or at the study site during their clinic visits ("clinic group"). This initial report describes the ongoing 4-year longitudinal study and provides baseline results, which confirm the feasibility of obtaining home-based clinical information via mail or telephone. Initial results for the experimental instruments and for the book club are reported in separate accompanying articles.

Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Oo T, Franssen E. · William and Sylvia Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, NY 10016, USA. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #16191246 No free full text.

Abstract: Cerebrovascular small vessel disease is now believed to be the major source of vascular burden of the brain. Cerebrovascular small vessel disease and Alzheimer's disease appear to represent pathophysiologic and clinical continua, rather than dichotomous entities. It appears that common etiopathologic mechanisms underlie the clinical presentation of both of these conditions. Therefore, the staging procedures that have been developed for the clinical continuum of age-associated memory impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and the progressive dementia of Alzheimer's disease appear to be applicable for the same continua in cerebrovascular small vessel disease. Although temporal and prognostic aspects have been studied for the Alzheimer's-related portions of this clinical staging continuum, they remain to be elucidated for cerebrovascular small vessel disease.

Ferris SH. · Silberstein Institute for Aging and Dementia, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #16191243 No free full text.

Abstract: A general cognitive performance battery is needed as a primary outcome in vascular dementia clinical trials. Because there is considerable overlap between vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the pattern of cognitive impairment, a reasonable approach to developing an optimal vascular dementia battery is to begin with a widely used AD measure and improve its sensitivity to the cognitive domains that are more prominent in vascular dementia. Thus the VaDAS-cog has evolved, which comprises the ADAS-cog with additional frontal lobe subtests covering attention, working memory, executive function, and verbal fluency. Validation of this new cognitive instrument will be supported by its successful use in vascular dementia clinical trials.

Monteiro IM, Boksay I, Auer SR, Torossian C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B. · Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. · Eur Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11520474 No free full text.

Abstract: The Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD) is a well-established instrument, designed to assess potentially remediable behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients as well as to evaluate treatment outcome. It consists of 25 symptoms grouped into seven categories. Each symptom is scored on the basis of severity on a four-point scale. A knowledgeable caregiver is queried and items are scored on the basis of symptoms noted in the preceding two weeks. Reliability, construct validity and criterion validity data for the BEHAVE-AD have previously been published. Because of the significance of psychopathology in dementia, it is necessary to optimally describe and define the nature, magnitude and prevalence of behavioral symptomatology. Accordingly, a frequency component was added to each of the 25 items of the BEHAVE-AD scale. The objective of the present report is to describe this new Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Frequency-Weighted Severity Scale (BEHAVE-AD-FW) and to establish its inter-rater reliability. In this investigation the BEHAVE-AD-FW scale was administered to caregivers of 28 patients with either mildly impaired cognitive function or a dementia diagnosis. Two clinicians separately and independently rated the responses. Analyses determined that the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the frequency component varied between 0.86 and 0.97 for each of the seven BEHAVE-AD categories (p(s) < 0.001). ICCs for the frequency-weighted scores (item severity score x item frequency score) ranged from 0.69 to 0.98 for the seven symptom categories (p(s) < 0.001). For the BEHAVE-AD-FW total scores, the ICC was 0.91 (P < 0.001). These results indicate that the frequency-weighted component is a reliable addition to the BEHAVE-AD scale.

Morris JC, Farlow MR, Ferris SH, Kurz AF, Maelicke A, Rasmusen L, Wilkinson D, Yan B. · Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #11396870 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Ferris SH. · Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #11396869 No free full text.

Abstract: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are the most frequently prescribed drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). To date, donepezil is prescribed most often, but newer AChEIs have become available. Rivastigmine entered the pharmaceutics market for AD in 2000, and galantamine was approved for use in the United States in February 2001. Some patients with AD may already be taking a cholinesterase inhibitor, but they or their caregivers may want to change therapies for various reasons, such as lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. Therefore, defined protocols for discontinuing one therapy and initiating another therapy (ie, "switching") while maintaining efficacy and minimizing cholinergic toxicity will be essential. A post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial that enrolled patients with and without previous exposure to AChEIs indicated that the efficacy and tolerability of a second and different cholinesterase treatment were similar in both subpopulations of patients. These findings suggest that discontinuation of prior AChEI treatment is not predictive of future poor response to an effective treatment.

Golomb J, Ferris SH. · Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center and Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. · Neurobiol Aging. · Pubmed #11124433 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Kluger A, Ferris SH, Golomb J, Mittelman MS, Reisberg B. · Department of Psychiatry, William and Sylvia Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA. · J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. · Pubmed #10616864 No free full text.

Abstract: This study examined whether baseline neuropsychological performance in elderly assessed at a research clinic could accurately predict subsequent decline to dementia. Logistic regression analyses were applied to (1) 213 nondemented elderly with a Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 1, 2, or 3, of whom 74 (35%) subsequently declined to any diagnosis of dementia, and (2) a diagnostically more restricted subset of this sample (N = 179), of whom 56 (31%) declined to a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). The mean follow-up intervals were 3.8 and 3.7 years, respectively. A small set of baseline neuropsychological measures (especially a Paragraph Delayed Recall Test) significantly differentiated decliners from nondecliners to dementia or AD, after accounting for the contribution of age, sex, education, follow-up interval, and the rating of global clinical status. When examined in combination with the other factors or alone, the cognitive tests produced reasonably high specificities (91%-97%) and sensitivities (73%-89%). Using the obtained regression model, a similar level of classification accuracy was replicated on an independent sample of 119 nondemented elderly. A subanalysis of the high-risk GDS 3 subgroup indicated that cut scores from the paragraph test distinguished nondecliners from decliners (overall accuracies 87%-91%), implying that this assessment may accurately predict future cognitive status in elderly with mild cognitive impairment.