Alzheimer Disease: Feldman H

McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O'Brien JT, Feldman H, Cummings J, Duda JE, Lippa C, Perry EK, Aarsland D, Arai H, Ballard CG, Boeve B, Burn DJ, Costa D, Del Ser T, Dubois B, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Goetz CG, Gomez-Tortosa E, Halliday G, Hansen LA, Hardy J, Iwatsubo T, Kalaria RN, Kaufer D, Kenny RA, Korczyn A, Kosaka K, Lee VM, Lees A, Litvan I, Londos E, Lopez OL, Minoshima S, Mizuno Y, Molina JA, Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Pasquier F, Perry RH, Schulz JB, Trojanowski JQ, Yamada M, Anonymous00346. · Institute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. · Neurology. · Pubmed #16237129 No free full text.

Abstract: The dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) Consortium has revised criteria for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of DLB incorporating new information about the core clinical features and suggesting improved methods to assess them. REM sleep behavior disorder, severe neuroleptic sensitivity, and reduced striatal dopamine transporter activity on functional neuroimaging are given greater diagnostic weighting as features suggestive of a DLB diagnosis. The 1-year rule distinguishing between DLB and Parkinson disease with dementia may be difficult to apply in clinical settings and in such cases the term most appropriate to each individual patient should be used. Generic terms such as Lewy body (LB) disease are often helpful. The authors propose a new scheme for the pathologic assessment of LBs and Lewy neurites (LN) using alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry and semiquantitative grading of lesion density, with the pattern of regional involvement being more important than total LB count. The new criteria take into account both Lewy-related and Alzheimer disease (AD)-type pathology to allocate a probability that these are associated with the clinical DLB syndrome. Finally, the authors suggest patient management guidelines including the need for accurate diagnosis, a target symptom approach, and use of appropriate outcome measures. There is limited evidence about specific interventions but available data suggest only a partial response of motor symptoms to levodopa: severe sensitivity to typical and atypical antipsychotics in approximately 50%, and improvements in attention, visual hallucinations, and sleep disorders with cholinesterase inhibitors.

Feldman H. · No affiliation provided · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #12636177 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Burns A, O'Brien J, Anonymous00334, Auriacombe S, Ballard C, Broich K, Bullock R, Feldman H, Ford G, Knapp M, McCaddon A, Iliffe S, Jacova C, Jones R, Lennon S, McKeith I, Orgogozo JM, Purandare N, Richardson M, Ritchie C, Thomas A, Warner J, Wilcock G, Wilkinson D, Anonymous00335. · University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. · J Psychopharmacol. · Pubmed #17060346 No free full text.

Abstract: The British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP) coordinated a meeting of experts to review the evidence on the drug treatment for dementia. The level of evidence (types) was rated using a standard system: Types 1a and 1b (evidence from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials or at least one controlled trial respectively); types 2a and 2b (one well-designed study or one other type of quasi experimental study respectively); type 3 (non-experimental descriptive studies); and type 4 (expert opinion). There is type 1a evidence for cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease; memantine for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease; and for the use of bright light therapy and aromatherapy. There is type 1a evidence of no effect of anti inflammatory drugs or statins. There is conflicting evidence regarding oestrogens, with type 2a evidence of a protective effect of oestrogens but 1b evidence of a harmful effect. Type 1a evidence for any effect of B12 and folate will be forthcoming when current trials report. There is type 1b evidence for gingko biloba in producing a modest benefit of cognitive function; cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of people with Lewy body disease (particularly neuropsychiatric symptoms); cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in treatment cognitive impairment associated with vascular dementia; and the effect of metal collating agents (although these should not be prescribed until more data on safety and efficacy are available). There is type 1b evidence to show that neither cholinesterase inhibitors nor vitamin E reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment; and there is no evidence that there is any intervention that can prevent the onset of dementia. There is type 1b evidence for the beneficial effects of adding memantine to cholinesterase inhibitors, and type 2b evidence of positive switching outcomes from one cholinesterase inhibitor to another. There is type 2a evidence for a positive effect of reminiscence therapy, and type 2a evidence that cognitive training does not work. There is type 3 evidence to support the use of psychological interventions in dementia. There is type 2 evidence that a clinical diagnosis of dementia can be made accurately and that brain imaging increases that accuracy.Although the consensus statement dealt largely with medication, the role of dementia care in secondary services (geriatric medicine and old age psychiatry) and primary care, along with health economics, was discussed. There is ample evidence that there are effective treatments for people with dementia, and Alzheimer's disease in particular. Patients, their carers, and clinicians deserve to be optimistic in a field which often attracts therapeutic nihilism.

Voisin T, Reynish E, Portet F, Feldman H, Vellas B. · Alzheimer's Disease Research Centre, Toulouse University Hospital, 170 Avenue de Casselardit, 31300 Toulouse, France. · CNS Drugs. · Pubmed #15222774 No free full text.

Abstract: By some estimates moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease accounts for 50% of all patients with Alzheimer's disease. However, there are numerous issues that remain to be resolved in the management of patients with more advanced Alzheimer's disease. The first prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in more advanced Alzheimer's disease has reported quite encouraging results, with further studies being undertaken. Post-hoc analyses of rivastigmine and galantamine in patients with more advanced Alzheimer's disease have supported the hypothesis that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are likely be efficacious in this subgroup. Memantine, a glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist, is newly licensed in Europe for the treatment of more advanced Alzheimer's disease and will provide the first non-cholinesterase inhibitor option for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The combination of donepezil and memantine has been shown to have superior efficacy than donepezil alone in this severe Alzheimer's disease subgroup, potentially supporting a role for dual treatment in more advanced Alzheimer's disease.Further studies of all aspects of more advanced Alzheimer's disease are clearly needed. The problems of translating clinical trial results to routine clinical practice are even more complex and challenging in this patient group, with the true impact of any one given treatment ranging over a spectrum of clinical domains from improved cognition to reduced caregiver burden. Increased attentiveness by clinicians to treatment response across this multidisciplinary spectrum in more advanced Alzheimer's disease is warranted.

McKeith I, Mintzer J, Aarsland D, Burn D, Chiu H, Cohen-Mansfield J, Dickson D, Dubois B, Duda JE, Feldman H, Gauthier S, Halliday G, Lawlor B, Lippa C, Lopez OL, Carlos Machado J, O'Brien J, Playfer J, Reid W, Anonymous00116. · Institute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #14693108 No free full text.

Abstract: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second commonest cause of neurodegenerative dementia in older people. It is part of the range of clinical presentations that share a neuritic pathology based on abnormal aggregation of the synaptic protein alpha-synuclein. DLB has many of the clinical and pathological characteristics of the dementia that occurs during the course of Parkinson's disease. Here we review the current state of scientific knowledge on DLB. Accurate identification of patients is important because they have specific symptoms, impairments, and functional disabilities that differ from those of other common types of dementia. Severe neuroleptic sensitivity reactions are associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors is well tolerated by most patients and substantially improves cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Clear guidance on the management of DLB is urgently needed. Virtually unrecognised 20 years ago, DLB could within this decade be one of the most treatable neurodegenerative disorders of late life.

Tabet N, Feldman H. · Old Age Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK, SE5 8AZ. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev. · Pubmed #12076498 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Inflammatory processes involving cytokines, prostaglandins, free radicals and glial cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as indomethacin attenuate inflammatory reactions. Hence, there may be a role for some of these drugs in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of indomethacin in the treatment of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (which contains records from many different medical and trials databases) on 14 June 2001 using the terms indomethacin and indome* and NSAIDS. In addition two independent reviewers systematically searched relevant computerized databases and Internet sites. This was supplemented by hand searching and additional references sought from selected papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Single or multi-centre placebo-controlled randomized trials examining the efficacy of indomethacin in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease were eligible for selection for this review. Using a standard extraction form, inclusion/exclusion criteria were set to ensure design quality and lack of bias of all trials included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected independently by two reviewers and any discrepancies were subject to discussion. Corresponding authors were contacted for any missing data needed for statistical analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Only one study was selected for this review (~~Rogers 1993~~). We detected no statistically significant difference between indomethacin treatment and placebo for the individual cognitive tests, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale ( ADAS), Boston Naming Test (BNT) and Token Test (TK). Dropouts and death rate were the only reported results that were amenable to evaluation. The dropout rate was higher in the indomethacin group (10/24) than in the control group (6/20). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more prevalent in the treatment group (5/24 compared with 1/20 in control group). There was no statistically significant difference in death rate between the two groups (p=0.9). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this one trial and subsequent analysis of data as reported by the authors, indomethacin cannot be recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate severity Alzheimer's disease. At doses of 100-150 mg daily, serious side effects will limit its use.

Feldman H, Kertesz A. · Division of Neurology, UBC Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · Can J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #11237307 No free full text.

Abstract: The release of the first approved medications for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Canada has highlighted the renewed need and importance of diagnostic accuracy and understanding of the spectrum of the dementias. The epidemiological scope of the problem of dementia in Canada including risk factors, caregiving patterns and costs of care have been well-characterized through the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA 1991-1996) with some of the key findings reviewed here. Beyond Alzheimer's disease the phenotypes and genotypes of the other degenerative dementias have been emerging with proposed operational diagnostic criteria that should facilitate their recognition in clinical practice. This paper reviews the clinical phenotypes of the most common causes of dementia with a proposed classification scheme and with discussion of their relevance from a differential treatment standpoint. This paper served as a background document for the working group of the Consensus Conference on Dementia (C3D) in February 1998 and has been revised subsequently for this publication.

Munoz DG, Feldman H. · Department of Pathology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #11216203 links to  free full text

Abstract: It is now understood that genetic factors play a crucial role in the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Rare mutations in at least 3 genes are responsible for early-onset familial AD. A common polymorphism in the apolipoprotein E gene is the major determinant of risk in families with late-onset AD, as well as in the general population. Advanced age, however, remains the major established risk factor for AD, although environmental variables may also have some role in disease expression. Some pathogenic factors directly associated with aging include oxidative damage and mutations in messenger RNA. Other factors unrelated to the aging process may, in the future, be amenable to therapeutic intervention by way of estrogen replacement therapy for postmenopausal women, anti-inflammatory drug therapy and reducing vascular risk factors. Older theories, such as aluminum playing a role in the pathogenesis of AD, have been mostly discarded as our understanding of pathogenic mechanisms of AD has advanced.

Gauthier S, Rockwood K, Gélinas I, Sykes L, Teunisse S, Orgogozo JM, Erkinjuntti T, Erzigkeit H, Gleeson M, Kittner B, Pontecorvo M, Feldman H, Whitehouse P. · McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Quebec, Canada. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #10609694 No free full text.

Abstract: Decline in functional abilities is a major component of the dementia syndrome. The definition of dementia in the International Classification of Diseases (10th rev.) requires a cognitive impairment sufficient to impair personal activities of daily living (ADL). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) also requires cognitive deficits sufficiently severe to cause impairment in occupational or social functioning and must represent a decline from a higher level of functioning. However, the term disability is more appropriate than impairment to describe a loss in activities, as opposed to a loss of elementary functions, and is consistent with World Health Organization definitions of impairment, disability, and handicap. There is no doubt that ADL outcomes are required in therapeutic drug studies on vascular dementia, and there is a good rationale and some evidence for the use of ADL scales developed for therapeutic research in Alzheimer disease, favoring scales devoid of items sensitive to physical disabilities. Similarly, ADL-related clinical milestones could be used for longer-term studies aiming predominantly at slowing progression of disease in both early and later stages of dementia. Slower decline in ADL and delay in reaching ADL-related clinical milestones should be considered as valid outcomes by regulatory bodies in the process of dementia drug approval.

Patterson CJ, Gauthier S, Bergman H, Cohen CA, Feightner JW, Feldman H, Hogan DB. · Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #10410640 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, Vellas B, Xu Y, Ieni JR, Schwam EM, Anonymous00304. · Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15920715 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There have been very limited investigations of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in more advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The efficacy and safety of donepezil were evaluated in post hoc analyses of a subgroup of patients with more severe AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE] score 5-12) within a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in moderate to severe AD (MSAD study). Additional analyses examined whether donepezil's treatment effects were consistent across the full range of baseline AD severity studied (sMMSE score 5-17). METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe AD (n = 290) who were living in the community or in assisted living facilities received donepezil or placebo for 24 weeks; n = 145 in the more severe AD subgroup. The primary outcome measure was the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-plus) with secondary outcomes including the sMMSE, Severe Impairment Battery, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Disability Assessment for Dementia. Analysis of Variance and Analysis of Covariance models tested for treatment x disease severity interaction in the full MSAD study sample. RESULTS: CIBIC-plus scores for donepezil patients were significantly improved compared with placebo for each time-point, with a 0.70 mean treatment difference at Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF; p = 0.0002). Significant differences favoring donepezil were noted at Week 24 LOCF for all secondary measures. There were no treatment x severity interactions for any of the efficacy measures. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, donepezil had significant benefits over placebo on global, cognitive, functional, and behavioral measures in a subgroup of patients with more severe AD. Furthermore, the treatment effects of donepezil were not driven by a particular stratum within the moderate to severe dementia range.

Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, Vellas B, Hux M, Xu Y, Schwam EM, Shah S, Mastey V, Anonymous00082. · Division of Neurology, UBC Hospital, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15326236 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the costs to society of Alzheimer disease (AD) care in a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with moderate to severe AD. METHODS: A total of 290 patients with AD (screening standardized Mini-Mental State Examination score 5 to 17) were randomized to receive either donepezil (n = 144; 5 mg/day for 28 days, followed by 10 mg/day as per clinician's judgment) or placebo (n = 146) for 24 weeks. The authors collected data on patient and caregiver health resource utilization prospectively using the Canadian Utilization of Services Tracking questionnaire. Costs were calculated for patients and caregivers in each group based on resource utilization multiplied by the unit prices for each resource. A cost (the average Ontario minimum wage for 1998 [Can 6.85 dollars per hour]) was assigned to unpaid time that caregivers spent assisting the patient with activities of daily living (ADL). RESULTS: Patient and caregiver demographics at baseline were similar across the two groups. After adjusting for baseline total cost per patient, the mean total societal cost per patient for the 24-week period was donepezil, Can 9,904 dollars (US 6,686 dollars) and placebo, Can 10,236 dollars (US 6,910 dollars). This net cost saving of Can 332 dollars (US 224 dollars) included the average 24-week cost of donepezil treatment. Most of the cost-saving with donepezil treatment was due to less use of residential care by patients, and caregivers spending less time assisting patients with ADL. CONCLUSION: This cost-consequence analysis reveals economic benefits of treatment of moderate to severe AD with donepezil.

Feldman H, Scheltens P, Scarpini E, Hermann N, Mesenbrink P, Mancione L, Tekin S, Lane R, Ferris S. · Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. · Neurology. · Pubmed #15079026 No free full text.

Abstract: The authors investigated neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from baseline data of the Investigation in the Delay to Diagnosis of AD with Exelon (InDDEx) study (n = 1,010). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported in 59% of subjects (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]). NPI+ subjects had significantly greater impairment on global, cognitive, and functional scores than NPI- subjects. The presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms appears to be a marker of MCI severity.

Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, Vellas B, Emir B, Mastey V, Subbiah P, Anonymous00277. · Division of Neurology, UBC Hospital, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. · J Am Geriatr Soc. · Pubmed #12757558 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the efficacy of donepezil treatment on activities of daily living (ADLs) and social functioning in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the possible benefits of this treatment on caregiving time and stress levels. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study. SETTING: Patients resided in the community or in assisted living facilities who did not require skilled 24-hour nursing care. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety patients with moderate to severe AD (baseline standardized Mini-Mental State Examination score of 5-17). INTERVENTION: Donepezil (5 mg/d for 4 weeks and 10 mg/d per clinician's judgment thereafter) or placebo for 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: ADLs were assessed using the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), the modified instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale (IADL+), and the modified Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS+). Caregiver time spent assisting patients with basic and instrumental ADLs was recorded as part of the IADL+ and PSMS+ scales. Patients' social behavior was evaluated through the use of a caregiver diary that captured observations of patients' motivation, interactions, and engagement. Caregivers were evaluated for their levels of caregiver stress with a modified, multiple-item Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS). For each outcome measure, the mean change from baseline at Week 24 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was calculated. RESULTS: IADL+ and PSMS+ mean change from baseline scores for donepezil-treated patients showed a slower decline during the study than placebo-treated patients (Week 24 LOCF mean treatment differences: IADL+ = 6.83, P <.0001; PSMS+ = 1.32, P =.0015). Significant differences between the groups in favor of donepezil were observed on the DAD for instrumental and basic ADLs and on the three components required for the completion of each ADL: initiation, planning and organization, and effective performance. At baseline, caregivers of patients treated with donepezil (n = 141) did not differ significantly from caregivers of patients treated with placebo (n = 146) with respect to demographics or mean total scores on the CSS. At Week 24 LOCF, the overall distribution of caregiver ratings on each of the three caregiver diary items favored donepezil-treated patients over placebo-treated patients (P <.005). At Week 24 LOCF, mean change from baseline scores for CSS total and individual domain scores (all domains except caregiving competence, personal gain, and management of distress) were better for caregivers of donepezil-treated patients than for those of placebo-treated patients (CSS total, mean treatment difference = 1.82). Caregivers of donepezil-treated patients reported spending less time assisting with ADLs than caregivers of placebo-treated patients (mean difference = 52.4 min/d). CONCLUSION: Donepezil demonstrated a significantly slower decline than placebo in instrumental and basic ADLs in these patients with moderate to severe AD. The ADL benefits in AD patients treated with donepezil were associated with less caregiving time and lower levels of caregiver stress.

Gauthier S, Feldman H, Hecker J, Vellas B, Ames D, Subbiah P, Whalen E, Emir B, Anonymous00001. · Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Quebec, Canada. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #12670060 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This subanalysis of a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the prevalence of behavioral symptoms in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the effect of treatment with donepezil. METHODS: Two hundred ninety patients with moderate to severe AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination scores 5-17) were randomized to receive 24 weeks of once-daily doses of donepezil 5 mg/day for 28 days, and 10 mg/day thereafter per the clinician's judgment (n = 144), or placebo (n = 146). The outcome measure of interest was the 12-item Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between the treatment groups. Least squares mean (+/- SE) baseline NPI 12-item total scores were 19.55 +/- 1.48 and 19.30 +/- 1.45, respectively. At baseline, the most common symptoms were apathy/indifference (67%), aberrant motor behavior (53%), depression/dysphoria (52%), anxiety (49%), and agitation/aggression (45%). NPI individual item change from baseline scores at Week 24 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis showed benefits with donepezil treatment compared with placebo for all items, with significant treatment differences for depression/dysphoria, anxiety, and apathy/indifference (p < .05). Symptoms present at baseline that improved significantly for donepezil- compared with placebo-treated patients at Week 24 LOCF included anxiety, apathy/indifference, and irritability/lability (p < .05). When patients who were not receiving psychoactive medications at baseline were analyzed separately, significant improvements in NPI (continued) 12-item total score were observed with donepezil compared with placebo at most visits and at Week 24 LOCF (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral symptoms of the magnitude observed in this moderate to severe AD population improved with donepezil.

Gauthier S, Feldman H, Hecker J, Vellas B, Emir B, Subbiah P, Anonymous00280. · · Curr Med Res Opin. · Pubmed #12442882 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of donepezil in a subgroup of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) of moderate severity from a previous trial. METHODS: Two hundred and seven patients with moderate AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE] score 10-17) were randomized to treatment in this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patents received either donepezil, 5 mg/day for the first 28 days and 10 mg/day thereafter according to the clinician's judgement (n = 102), or placebo (n = 105). The primary outcome measure was the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change with caregiver input (CIBIC-plus) at week 24 using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis. RESULTS: Baseline patient demographics were similar between treatment groups. Mean age was 74.3 years (range 48-92). Least-squares (LS) mean sMMSE scores at baseline were 13.6 +/- 0.3 for the donepezil group and 13.9 +/- 0.3 for the placebo group. LS mean CIBIC-plus scores for donepezil-treated patients were improved from, or close to, baseline severity at all visits, and were significantly different from placebo at weeks 8, 12, 18, and 24 (week 24 LOCF mean difference = 0.53, p = 0.0003). LS mean change from baseline scores on the sMMSE and Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) for the donepezil group improved throughout the study, and were significantly different from placebo at each visit for the sMMSE (week 24 LOCF mean difference = 2.06, p = 0.0002) and from week 8 for the SIB (week 24 LOCF mean difference = -4.44, p = 0.0026). LS mean change scores on the Disability Assessment for Dementia remained at or above baseline levels throughout the study for the donepezil group, while the placebo group showed a steady decline; treatment differences were significant at each visit (week 24 LOCF mean difference = -9.25, p < 0.0001). LS mean change scores on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory 12-item total improved throughout the study for the donepezil group and were significantly different from placebo at weeks 4 and 24 (week 24 LOCF mean difference = 5.92, p = 0.0022). Eighty-one per cent of donepezil-treated and 89% of placebo-treated patients completed the trial, with 9% and 5%, respectively, discontinuing due to adverse events (AEs). Eighty-two per cent of donepezil-treated and 80% of placebo-treated patients experienced AEs, the majority of which were rated mild in severity and, in general, were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The significant treatment responses observed with donepezil in these patients reinforce the findings from earlier studies that show donepezil to have important benefits, compared wih placebo, across functional, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms, with good tolerability, in patients with AD of moderate severity.

Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, Vellas B, Subbiah P, Whalen E, Anonymous00206. · Division of Neurology, UBC Hospital, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · Neurology. · Pubmed #11524468 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with moderate to severe AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE] scores of 5 to 17; Functional Assessment Staging score < or =6 at baseline). METHODS: Two-hundred ninety patients were randomized to treatment in this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received either donepezil 5 mg/day for the first 28 days and 10 mg/day thereafter as per the clinician's judgment (n = 144) or placebo (n = 146). The primary outcome measure was the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change with caregiver input (CIBIC+). RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 73.6 years (range 48 to 92 years). Baseline demographics were similar between the treatment groups. Least squares (LS) mean +/- SE sMMSE scores at baseline were 11.7 +/- 0.35 for the donepezil group and 12.0 +/- 0.34 for the placebo group. Patients receiving donepezil showed benefits on the CIBIC+, compared with placebo, at all visits up to week 24 (p < 0.001) and at week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF) (p < 0.0001). All other secondary measures (including sMMSE, Severe Impairment Battery, Disability Assessment for Dementia, Functional Rating Scale, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory) showed significant differences between the groups in favor of donepezil at week 24 LOCF. Eighty-four percent of donepezil- and 86% of placebo-treated patients completed the trial. Adverse events (AE) were experienced by 83% of donepezil- and 80% of placebo-treated patients, the majority of which were rated mild in severity; 8% of donepezil- and 6% of placebo-treated patients discontinued because of AE. Laboratory and vital sign abnormalities were similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that donepezil's benefits extend into more advanced stages of AD than those previously investigated, with very good tolerability.

Feldman H, Sauter A, Donald A, Gélinas I, Gauthier S, Torfs K, Parys W, Mehnert A. · Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #11391090 No free full text.

Abstract: The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale was developed and validated as a measure of functional ability in dementia. DAD results have been reported in Alzheimer disease (AD) randomized, controlled treatment trials of up to 6 months, but results beyond 6 months have yet to be described. SAB INT 12 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in mild to moderate AD that included DAD assessments at baseline, month 6, and month 12. One hundred forty-four patients with AD in the placebo arm of SAB INT 12 were followed up for 12 months. DAD scores were obtained at baseline (mean DAD = 70.1, SD = 22.2), 6 months (mean DAD = 63.7, SD = 25.2), and 12 months (mean DAD = 59.3, SD = 28.9). The rate of decline was consistent across the domains of basic activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs, as well as the scoring of initiation, planning, and organization. The decline in DAD total scores in mild to moderate AD averages about one point per month, which equates to the loss of one item on the DAD scale every 2 months.

Jones RW, Kivipelto M, Feldman H, Sparks L, Doody R, Waters DD, Hey-Hadavi J, Breazna A, Schindler RJ, Ramos H, Anonymous00217. · RICE (The Research Institute for the Care of Older People), Royal United Hospital, Bath, United Kingdom. · Alzheimers Dement. · Pubmed #18631958 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that elevated cholesterol levels in mid-life are associated with increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD), and that statins might have a protective effect against AD and dementia. The Lipitor's Effect in Alzheimer's Dementia (LEADe) study tests the hypothesis that a statin (atorvastatin 80 mg daily) will provide a benefit on the course of mild to moderate AD in patients receiving background therapy of a cholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil 10 mg daily). METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study with a double-blind randomized withdrawal phase of patients with mild to moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 13 to 25). Inclusion criteria included age 50 to 90 years, receiving donepezil 10 mg for at least 3 months before randomization, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (LDL-C) 2.5 to 3.5 mmol/L (95 to 195 mg/dL). Co-primary end points are changes in AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and AD Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale scores. A confirmatory end point is rate of change in whole brain and hippocampal volumes in patients who enrolled in the magnetic resonance imaging substudy. RESULTS: Enrollment of 641 subjects is complete. The baseline mean data are age 74 +/- 8 years, 53% women, MMSE 22 +/- 3, ADAS-cog 23 +/- 10, AD Functional Assessment and Change Scale (ADFACS) 13 +/- 9, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) 10 +/- 11, and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) 6 +/- 3. Mean prior donepezil treatment was 409 +/- 407 days. Mean baseline lipid levels are total cholesterol 5.8 +/- 0.8 mmol/L (224 +/- 33 mg/dL), LDL-C 3.7 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (143 +/- 26 mg/dL), triglycerides 1.5 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (132 +/- 64 mg/dL), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/L (64 +/- 18 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: LEADe will report in 2008 and is expected to provide a more definitive evaluation of the potential for statins in the treatment of people with AD.

Winblad B, Gauthier S, Scinto L, Feldman H, Wilcock GK, Truyen L, Mayorga AJ, Wang D, Brashear HR, Nye JS, Anonymous00251. · Karolinska Institutet, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden. · Neurology. · Pubmed #18322263 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of galantamine in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the ability of galantamine to benefit cognition and global functioning in subjects with MCI, and the ability of galantamine to delay conversion to dementia. METHODS: In two studies, 2,048 subjects, 990 in Study 1 and 1,058 in Study 2, with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, CDR memory score > or =0.5, without dementia were randomized to double-blind galantamine (16-24 mg/day) or placebo for 24 months. Primary efficacy endpoint at month 24 was number (%) of subjects who converted from MCI to dementia (CDR > or = 1.0). RESULTS: There were no differences between galantamine and placebo in 24-month conversion rates (Study 1: 22.9% [galantamine] vs 22.6% [placebo], p = 0.146; Study 2: 25.4% [galantamine] vs 31.2% [placebo], p = 0.619). Mean CDR-sum of boxes declined less with galantamine than placebo at 12 and 24 months in Study 1 (p = 0.024 [12 months] and p = 0.028 [24 months]), but not in Study 2 (p = 0.662 [12 months] and p = 0.056 [24 months]). Digit Symbol Substitution Test scores improved with galantamine in Study 1 at 12 months and in Study 2 at 24 months (Study 1: p = 0.009 [month 12] and p = 0.079 [Month 24]; Study 2: p = 0.154 [month 12] and p = 0.020 [month 24]). The most frequently reported adverse event was nausea (galantamine, 29%; placebo, 10%). Serious AEs occurred in 19% of each group. Mortality of the cohort after retrospectively determining the status of subjects (98.3%) at 24 months was 1.4% (galantamine) and 0.3% (placebo); RR (95% CI), 1.70 (1.00, 2.90). CONCLUSIONS: Galantamine failed to significantly influence conversion to dementia. Galantamine was generally well tolerated. Whereas recorded mortality was greater in the galantamine group than in the placebo group in the original per-protocol assessment, a post hoc analysis of the cohort was consistent with no increased risk.

Rademakers R, Baker M, Gass J, Adamson J, Huey ED, Momeni P, Spina S, Coppola G, Karydas AM, Stewart H, Johnson N, Hsiung GY, Kelley B, Kuntz K, Steinbart E, Wood EM, Yu CE, Josephs K, Sorenson E, Womack KB, Weintraub S, Pickering-Brown SM, Schofield PR, Brooks WS, Van Deerlin VM, Snowden J, Clark CM, Kertesz A, Boylan K, Ghetti B, Neary D, Schellenberg GD, Beach TG, Mesulam M, Mann D, Grafman J, Mackenzie IR, Feldman H, Bird T, Petersen R, Knopman D, Boeve B, Geschwind DH, Miller B, Wszolek Z, Lippa C, Bigio EH, Dickson D, Graff-Radford N, Hutton M. · Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #17826340 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The progranulin gene (GRN) is mutated in 5-10% of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and in about 20% of patients with familial FTLD. The most common mutation in GRN is Arg493X. We aimed to establish the contribution of this mutation to FTLD and related disorders. METHODS: We measured the frequency of Arg493X in 3405 unrelated patients with various neurodegenerative diseases using Taqman single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. Clinicopathological characterisation and shared haplotype analysis were done for 30 families with FTLD who carry Arg493X. To investigate the effect of potential modifying loci, we did linear regression analyses with onset age as the covariate for GRN variants, for genotypes of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE), and for haplotypes of the microtubule-associated protein tau gene (MAPT). FINDINGS: Of 731 patients with FTLD, 16 (2%) carried Arg493X. This mutation was not detected in 2674 patients who did not have FTLD. In 37 patients with Arg493X from 30 families with FTLD, clinical diagnoses included frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, corticobasal syndrome, and Alzheimer's disease. Range of onset age was 44-69 years. In all patients who came to autopsy (n=13), the pathological diagnosis was FTLD with neuronal inclusions that contained TAR DNA-binding protein or ubiquitin, but not tau. Neurofibrillary tangle pathology in the form of Braak staging correlated with overall neuropathology in the Arg493X carriers. Haplotype analyses suggested that Arg493X arose twice, with a single founder for 27 families. Linear regression analyses suggested that patients with SNP rs9897528 on their wild-type GRN allele have delayed symptom onset. Onset ages were not associated with the MAPT H1 or H2 haplotypes or APOE genotypes, but early memory deficits were associated with the presence of an APOE epsilon4 allele. INTERPRETATION: Clinical heterogeneity is associated with GRN haploinsufficiency, and genetic variability on the wild-type GRN allele might have a role in the age-related disease penetrance of GRN mutations.

Rockwood K, Moorhouse PK, Song X, MacKnight C, Gauthier S, Kertesz A, Montgomery P, Black S, Hogan DB, Guzman A, Bouchard R, Feldman H, Anonymous00236. · Dalhousie University, Canada. · J Neurol Sci. · Pubmed #17189642 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Empirical studies to clarify the outcomes in Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) are needed. We compared cognitive, functional, and behavioural outcomes in patients with VCI to patients with no cognitive impairment (NCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Secondary analysis of the Consortium to Investigate Vascular Impairment of Cognition (CIVIC), a multi-centre Canadian memory clinic 30-month cohort study. RESULTS: Of 1347 patients, 938 were eligible for follow-up, of whom 239 (24.5%) were lost and 29 (3%) had died. Of the remaining 697 patients, 125 had NCI, 229 had VCI, and 343 had AD at baseline. Compared to people with NCI, of whom 20-40% showed progression based on cognitive and functional measures, those with VCI were more likely to progress (50-65%), as were people with AD (50-80%) (p<0.01). More people with VCI showed progression of affective symptoms (30%) than those with NCI (12%) or AD (15% p<0.01). Progression of impaired judgment (rated clinically) in VCI (15%) was similar to AD (11%) but more common than in NCI (4%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most people with VCI show readily detectable progression by 30 months. Depressive symptoms were more common and more progressive in VCI than in Alzheimer's disease, whereas clinical evidence of progressive executive dysfunction was common in both AD and VCI.

Feldman H, Clarfield AM, Brodsky J, King Y, Dwolatzky T. · Department of Geriatrics and Memory Clinic, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #17026778 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of dementia among the residents of geriatric institutions in the greater Jerusalem area. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional survey of a representative sample, weighted according to the level of care, of 11 of the 88 long-term care (LTC) wards in 34 LTC institutions providing care for the elderly residents in the greater Jerusalem area in 1999. A single physician interviewed 311 residents. The presence of dementia was determined from medical records and by performance on the Modified Mini-mental State Examination (3MS) instrument (with a score less than 78/100 indicating significant cognitive impairment or suspected dementia), and professional care providers were interviewed for their opinion regarding the presence of dementia in each subject. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 83.9 years and 75% were women. Overall, 180 residents, representing 49.9% of the weighted sample in Jerusalem LTC facilities, were determined to have dementia according to medical records, ranging from 22.9% in independent and frail care units to 97.7% in skilled nursing care wards. However, based on their performance on the 3MS, the prevalence of cognitive impairment with suspected dementia among the subjects was substantially greater, with the staff being unaware of this diagnosis in about one-quarter of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of dementia in geriatric institutions in the Jerusalem area, particularly in those providing greater care. Moreover, significant cognitive impairment is probably under-reported in the medical records.

Hsiung GY, Sadovnick AD, Feldman H. · Department of Medicine, Clinic for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #15477624 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon4 genotype is a well-established risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, its effect on predicting conversion from normal to "cognitive impairment, no dementia" (CIND) and from CIND to AD is less clear. METHODS: We used a nested case-control design from the population-based Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) to examine the effect of ApoE epsilon4 genotype on the conversion of subjects from normal to CIND and from CIND to AD. We also contrasted these findings with incident cases of AD and vascular dementia (VaD) in the CSHA cohort. RESULTS: The ApoE epsilon4 genotype was a significant risk factor for conversion from CIND to AD and from normal to AD and VaD. However, it was not a significant risk factor for conversion from normal to CIND. This effect is robust to adjustment for age, sex and education level. There is significant interaction between the ApoE epsilon4 genotype and age for AD and for conversion from CIND to AD. No interaction between ApoE epsilon4 genotype, sex, age, ethnicity and education level was found in other subgroup analyses. The positive predictive value of ApoE epsilon4 for predicting CIND conversion to AD was 0.48, and the negative predictive value was 0.65. INTERPRETATION: Possession of an ApoE epsilon4 allele increases the risk of AD developing from CIND. It is also associated with a decrease in the age at onset of AD. Its predictive values do not support its utility as a diagnostic test for predicting progression from CIND to AD, but it may be useful in research studies to enrich study samples that have a higher rate of progression to AD.

Erkinjuntti T, Román G, Gauthier S, Feldman H, Rockwood K. · Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. · Stroke. · Pubmed #15001795 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and ischemic brain injury secondary to cardiovascular disease are common causes of dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly. CVD also contributes to cognitive loss in Alzheimer disease (AD). SUMMARY: Progress in understanding vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and vascular dementia (VaD) has resulted in promising symptomatic and preventive treatments. Cholinergic deficits in VaD due to ischemia of basal forebrain nuclei and cholinergic pathways can be treated with cholinesterase inhibitors used in AD. Controlled clinical trials with donepezil and galantamine in patients with VaD, as well as in patients with AD plus CVD, have demonstrated improvement in cognition, behavior, and activities of daily living. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine stabilized progression of VaD compared with placebo. Primary and secondary stroke prevention, in particular with control of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, can decrease VaD incidence. CONCLUSIONS: From a public health viewpoint, recognition of VCI before the development of dementia and correction of vascular burden on the brain may lead to a global decrease of incident dementia.