| 1 |
Guideline [Interdisciplinary guidelines on diagnosis and treatment for extracerebral amyloidoses--published by the German Society of Amyloid Diseases (www.amyloid.de)] 2006
Röcken C, Ernst J, Hund E, Michels H, Perz J, Saeger W, Sezer O, Spuler S, Willig F, Schmidt HH, Anonymous00262. · Institut für Pathologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin. · Dtsch Med Wochenschr. · Pubmed #16835821 No free full text.
Abstract: Within the past 10 years, a new range of knowledge has been achieved in the field of amyloidosis, especially with regard to pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. Amyloidosis leads to variable and distinct symptoms and is caused by different underlying conditions. Some amyloidoses are acquired secondary to a chronic condition; others are caused by genetic mutations. Amyloid and amyloidosis occur more frequently than they are perceived. Among the frequent localized forms are the cerebral amyloidosis linked to Alzheimer disease (AD) and the pancreatic amyloidosis linked to diabetes mellitus. Among the most frequent systemic (extracerebral) forms is AL amyloidosis, which often has a poor prognosis and if untreated can rapidly lead to death. Systemic amyloidosis that happen at infancy are mainly AA amyloidosis that can progress to death already at early or at middle adulthood. Amyloidosis can be treated but therapeutic success significantly depends upon early diagnosis and proper classification of the amyloid type. It is mandatory that differential diagnosis demonstrate the presence of amyloid and clearly identify the type of the disease. Development of methods and techniques have contributed to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment. Early diagnosis and proper classification of amyloid is decisive for therapeutic options and upon them depend quality of life and mortality. The therapeutic spectrum is various and includes organ transplantation, chemotherapy, and anti-inflammatory strategies. Gene therapy and biological active substances have to be considered in the near future.
|
| 2 |
Article [Misdemeanor in frontotemporal dementia] 2006
Diehl J, Ernst J, Krapp S, Förstl H, Nedopil N, Kurz A. · Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik der TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München. · Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. · Pubmed #16671160 No free full text.
Abstract: The nature and prevalence of misdemeanor in patients with dementia due to frontotemporal lobar degeneration has been described in a few case reports and in two small U.S. studies. Our clinical impression suggests that antisocial and aggressive behaviour are relatively frequent in this patient population. The objective of the present study was to verify this observation. For this purpose we developed a standardized questionnaire on misdemeanor in Frontotemporal Dementia. Using this instrument caregivers of 30 patients with Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), 11 patients with Semantic dementia (SD) and 33 patients with Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) were interviewed. The interview included questions about theft, burglary, damaging other peoples' belongings, verbal or physical offence, bodily harm, drug abuse and use of weapons. Questions about the frequency of criminal behaviour, the amount of damages and consequences if applicable completed the questionnaire. Misdemeanor was found in half of the patients with FTD (15 out of 30) and in 7 out of 11 patients with SD, but only in one out of 33 patients with AD. The most frequent type of inappropriate behaviour was theft (13 patients), particularly shoplifting. 8 patients with FTD, 1 patient with SD and 1 patient with AD entered someone else's house without permission. 10 patients with FTD and 3 patients with SD but none of the patients with AD had physically threatened spouses, relatives or strangers. In one case another person was hurt.
|
|
|