Alzheimer Disease: Caine ED

Kim SY, Karlawish JH, Caine ED. · Department of Psychiatry, Division of Medical Humanities, University of Rochester School of Medicine, NY 14642, USA. · Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11925276 No free full text.

Abstract: As the number of cognitively impaired elderly persons increases, the need for evidence-based assessments of their capacity to consent to medical treatment and research participation will grow. The authors conducted an electronic and manual literature search for all English-language articles examining the decision-making capacity of elderly persons with dementia or cognitive impairment, reviewing articles in relation to key areas of methodological, clinical, and policy importance. The 32 relevant studies identified were highly heterogeneous, even in their definitions and measurements of decisional capacity. Although incapacity is common, many persons with dementia are capable of making their own medical and research decisions. In Alzheimer disease, memory and executive-function deficits predict decisional impairment. Still, at least in early stages of dementia, interventions may improve decisional abilities. Short and simple cognitive screening may be useful by identifying persons in need of more intensive evaluations. The use of expert judgment-based methods may mitigate the problem of a lack of a criterion standard for competence. Research into the decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons is a growing field. It is beginning to yield findings with practical implications for preserving the autonomy and welfare of this group of vulnerable elderly patients.

Kim SY, Caine ED. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. · Psychiatr Serv. · Pubmed #12364686 links to  free full text

Abstract: The call for formal capacity assessments of potential research participants with impairments due to illnesses such as Alzheimer's disease is increasing. Because such an evaluation of every potential subject requires significant resources, clinicians and researchers may want to know the utility and the limits of a familiar cognitive screening test, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), in capacity evaluations. In this study of 37 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, a fairly wide range of MMSE scores (21 to 25, which includes an often used cutoff for "normal") did not discriminate capacity status well. Nevertheless, there may still be approaches that enhance the practical utility of the MMSE in capacity assessment.

Kim SY, Cox C, Caine ED. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicne and Dentistry, NY 14642, USA. · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11986134 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Ethical concerns persist over research participation of decisionally impaired persons, such as those suffering from Alzheimer's disease. Such persons may be poor judges of the burdens and risks of specific research protocols. Since even decisionally incapacitated persons cannot be enrolled in studies against their objection, their preferences convey important ethical information. The authors examined the effects of cognitive and decisional impairment on willingness to participate in research among persons with Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: Cognitive status, decision-making ability, and willingness to participate in four hypothetical research protocols of varying risk/benefit profiles were measured in 34 subjects with mild to mild/moderate Alzheimer's disease and 14 healthy elderly comparison subjects. Univariate and multivariate methods were used to analyze the effects of impairment in cognitive and decision-making abilities on willingness to participate in research. RESULTS: There were no differences in willingness to participate found between the Alzheimer's and the healthy comparison subjects for three of the four hypothetical protocols. In both groups, willingness declined as risk increased. Within the Alzheimer's disease group, the presence of greater decisional impairment tended to predict less willingness to participate in research, even after adjusting for cognitive impairment, gender, and education. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with decisional impairment due to Alzheimer's disease are as a group able to distinguish between research protocols of varying risk/benefit profiles. Because declining decision-making abilities may predict declining willingness to participate in research, informed consent procedures for Alzheimer's disease research should be sensitive to this possibility.

Olin JT, Schneider LS, Katz IR, Meyers BS, Alexopoulos GS, Breitner JC, Bruce ML, Caine ED, Cummings JL, Devanand DP, Krishnan KR, Lyketsos CG, Lyness JM, Rabins PV, Reynolds CF, Rovner BW, Steffens DC, Tariot PN, Lebowitz BD. · Adult and Geriatric Treatment and Preventive Interventions Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-9635, USA. · Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11925273 No free full text.

Abstract: The authors, a group of investigators with extensive research and clinical experience related to both late-life depression and Alzheimer disease (AD), propose provisional affective and behavioral inclusion and exclusion diagnostic criteria for Depression of AD.

Kim SY, Caine ED, Currier GW, Leibovici A, Ryan JM. · Department of Psychiatry and Division of Medical Humanities, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY 14642, USA. · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #11329391 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The capacity of persons with Alzheimer's disease or other neuropsychiatric disorders for giving consent to participate in research has come under increasing scrutiny. While instruments for measuring abilities related to capacity have been developed, how they should be used to categorize subjects as capable or incapable is not clear. A criterion validation study was carried out to help address this question. METHOD: The authors measured the ability of 37 subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and 15 elderly comparison subjects to provide consent for participation in a hypothetical clinical trial. Using the judgment of three experts as the criterion standard, the authors performed a receiver operator characteristic analysis for the capacity ability measures from the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Clinical Research VERSION: The results were compared with categorizations of capacity status that were based on normative values. RESULTS: While most comparison subjects scored perfectly on all measures of the competence assessment tool, the majority of the group with Alzheimer's disease showed significant decision-making impairment. Thresholds based on normative values resulted in 84% (N=31) of the Alzheimer's disease subjects being rated as incapable on at least one ability; thresholds based on expert judgment resulted in 62% (N=23) failing to meet cutoff scores on at least one ability. CONCLUSIONS: Even relatively mild Alzheimer's disease significantly impairs consent-giving capacity. But differentiating capable from incapable subjects remains an issue despite the aid of standardized tools. More research is needed to understand the relationship between subject factors (performance on ability measures) and categorical judgments about their capacity.