Alzheimer Disease: Breitner JC

Martin BK, Breitner JC, Evans D, Lyketsos CG, Meinert CL. · Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md, USA. · Am J Med. · Pubmed #17349436 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Breitner JC, Costa PT. · No affiliation provided · Neurology. · Pubmed #14663023 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Breitner JC. · No affiliation provided · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #14512825 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Breitner JC, Zandi PP. · No affiliation provided · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #11794225 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Sonnen JA, Breitner JC, Lovell MA, Markesbery WR, Quinn JF, Montine TJ. · Department of Pathology and of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. · Free Radic Biol Med. · Pubmed #18482592 links to  free full text

Abstract: Advances in our understanding of the etiologies and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) highlight a role for free radical-mediated injury to brain regions from early stages of this illness. Here we will review the evidence from transgenic mouse models of AD, autopsy samples, and human biofluids obtained during life paying particular attention to the stage of disease. In addition, we will review the epidemiologic literature that addresses the potential of anti-oxidants to prevent incident dementia from AD, and the clinical trial literature that addresses anti-oxidant preventative or therapeutic strategies for different stage of AD. Future efforts in preclinical models and ultimately clinical trials are needed to define optimally effective agents and combinations, doses, and timing to suppress safely this facet of AD.

Szekely CA, Breitner JC, Zandi PP. · Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. · Int Rev Psychiatry. · Pubmed #18092245 No free full text.

Abstract: The already considerable public health burden of Alzheimer's disease will likely worsen as populations around the world age. As a result, there is considerable motivation to develop effective strategies for preventing the disease. A wide variety of such strategies are under investigation and include pharmaceuticals, nutriceuticals, diet, physical activity and cognitive activity. We review here the most promising candidates and the epidemiologic evidence for their efficacy. Although none of these have yet to be definitively shown to prevent Alzheimer's disease, further research should help to clarify what role they may play in reducing the burden of this disease.

Montine TJ, Quinn JF, Montine KS, Kaye JA, Breitner JC. · Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. · J Alzheimers Dis. · Pubmed #16556967 No free full text.

Abstract: Dementia from Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents a significant and growing public health burden and presents a clear therapeutic imperative. Key to success in this undertaking will be biomarkers for the objective assessment of disease progression and response to therapeutics. Oxidative damage is one facet of AD pathogenesis for which there are experimentally validated quantitative in vivo biomarkers, the F2-isoprostanes (IsoPs). While plasma- or urine-based assays are desirable, consistent and reproducible cross-sectional data for increased F2-IsoPs in AD and mild cognitive impairment have been obtained only for CSF. In addition, measurement of CSF F2-IsoPs can increase the accuracy of laboratory-based classification of geriatric dementias, and have been used to assess objectively the response to anti-oxidant interventions in AD.

Szekely CA, Thorne JE, Zandi PP, Ek M, Messias E, Breitner JC, Goodman SN. · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Neuroepidemiology. · Pubmed #15279021 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Alzheimer's disease, the most prevalent dementia, is a prominent source of chronic illness in the elderly. Laboratory evidence suggests that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might prevent the onset of Alzheimer's disease. Since the early 1990s numerous observational epidemiological studies have also investigated this possibility. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to summarize and evaluate available evidence regarding exposure to nonaspirin NSAIDs and risk of Alzheimer's disease using meta-analyses of published studies. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Medline, Biological Abstracts, and the Cochrane Library for publications 1960 onwards. All cross-sectional, retrospective, or prospective observational studies of Alzheimer's disease in relation to NSAID exposure were included in the analysis. At least 2 of 4 independent reviewers characterized each study by source of data and design, including method of classifying exposure and outcome, and evaluated the studies for eligibility. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus of all 4 reviewers. RESULTS: Of 38 publications, 11 met the qualitative criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. For the 3 case-control and 4 cross-sectional studies, the combined risk estimate for development of Alzheimer's disease was 0.51 (95% Cl=0.40-0.66) for NSAID exposure. In the prospective studies, the estimate was 0.74 (95% Cl=0.62-0.89) for 4 studies reporting lifetime NSAID exposure and it was 0.42 (95% Cl=0.26-0.66) for the 3 studies reporting a duration of use of 2 or more years. CONCLUSIONS: Based on analysis of prospective and nonprospective studies, NSAID exposure was associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease. An issue that requires further exploration in future trials or observational studies is the temporal relationship between NSAID exposure and protection against Alzheimer's disease.

Breitner JC. · GRECC (S-182), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. · Lancet Neurol. · Pubmed #12941571 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Zandi PP, Breitner JC, Anthony JC. · Department of Mental Hygiene, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Hampton House 884, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Expert Opin Pharmacother. · Pubmed #11934339 No free full text.

Abstract: A growing body of evidence suggests that several classes of drugs marketed for other indications may be effective in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease. Among the most promising of these are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, oestrogens (oestrogen replacement therapy) and antioxidant vitamins. Other less well-established candidates include histamine H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2) blockers) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins). For each of these, we discuss possible mechanisms for their postulated neuroprotective effects and review the studies suggesting their benefits in Alzheimer's disease. We conclude that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oestrogen replacement therapies may be effective in preventing Alzheimer's disease only if taken during the latent phase of the disease several years prior to the appearance of disturbances. Antioxidants may also prevent Alzheimer's disease, but unlike nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oestrogen replacement therapies, they may continue to have beneficial effects even after the clinical onset of the disease. The only way to demonstrate the efficacy of these agents will be through randomised, controlled prevention trials. Such trials are currently underway but conclusive results may not be available for several years. Although intriguing, more studies on the neuroprotective effects of statins and H(2) blockers are needed before trials of these agents are initiated. Finally, there are other classes of pharmacological compounds emerging on the horizon, including folic acid, anti-beta-sheet conformational agents, secretase inhibitors and vaccines, that may soon prove to be effective for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Zandi PP, Breitner JC. · Department of Mental Hygiene, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Neurobiol Aging. · Pubmed #11754987 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Breitner JC, Miech RA. · Department of Mental Hygiene, The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Neurobiol Aging. · Pubmed #10604438 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Sonnen JA, Larson EB, Gray SL, Wilson A, Kohama SG, Crane PK, Breitner JC, Montine TJ. · Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. · Ann Neurol. · Pubmed #19259965 No free full text.

Abstract: Evidence supports a pathogenic role for free radical injury to brain in Alzheimer's disease; however, clinical trial results are only mildly encouraging. Examining brains from The Adult Changes in Thought study offers a unique perspective. Selectively increased free radical damage to cerebral cortex was associated with Alzheimer's disease, microvascular brain injury, and current smoking, but not with antioxidant supplement usage. Our results support suppression of free radical injury to brain as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease and microvascular brain injury; however, future clinical trials should consider other antioxidants or doses than those identified in our study.

Khachaturian AS, Zandi PP, Lyketsos CG, Hayden KM, Skoog I, Norton MC, Tschanz JT, Mayer LS, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Breitner JC. · Khachaturian and Associates Inc., Potomac, MD, USA. · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #16533956 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that antihypertensive (AH) medications may reduce the risk of dementing illnesses. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship of AH medication use with incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD) among the elderly population (aged 65 years and older) of Cache County, Utah, and to examine whether the relationship varies with different classes of AH medications. METHODS: After an initial (wave 1) multistage assessment (1995 through 1997) to identify prevalent cases of dementia, we used similar methods 3 years later (wave 2) to identify 104 incident cases of AD among the 3308 survivors. At the baseline assessment, we obtained a detailed drug inventory from the study participants. We carried out discrete time survival analyses to examine the association between the use of AH medications (including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics) at baseline with subsequent risk of AD. RESULTS: Use of any AH medication at baseline was associated with lower incidence of AD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.98). Examination of medication subclasses showed that use of diuretics (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.94), and specifically potassium-sparing diuretics (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.64), was associated with the greatest reduction in risk of AD. Corresponding analysis with a fully examined subsample controlling for blood pressure measurements did not substantially change our findings. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that AH medications, and specifically potassium-sparing diuretics, are associated with reduced incidence of AD. Because the latter association is a new finding, it requires confirmation in further study.

Carlson MC, Tschanz JT, Norton MC, Welsh-Bohmer K, Martin BK, Breitner JC. · Department of Mental Hygiene, and Center on Aging & Health, The Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. · Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. · Pubmed #11882746 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of nizatidine, a histamine H2-blocking drug, in delaying the progression of cognitive impairment in older adults with Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: A one-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one older men and women aged 67 to 96 years with AD were recruited from the Cache County Study on Memory in Aging. METHODS: Patients were stratified by age and by the presence of one or more epsilon 4 alleles at the APOE locus, then randomized to receive nizatidine 75 mg (Axid ARTM, Whitehall Robins) or a matching placebo tablet twice daily. Cognitive outcomes were assessed at baseline, six, and twelve months after enrollment using tests from the CERAD battery and additional measures of visuospatial memory, verbal memory, and verbal fluency. RESULTS: Subjects showed significant declines in language, fluency, and praxis but most measures of memory had already "bottomed out." Intention-to-treat and compliance-based analyses showed no effect of nizatidine on any of the cognitive outcome measures over the one-year study interval. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support claims for the efficacy of nizatidine in over-the-counter dosages as a means of preventing symptom progression in AD.

Martin BK, Meinert CL, Breitner JC, Anonymous00270. · Department of Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Trials, Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Control Clin Trials. · Pubmed #11852171 No free full text.

Abstract: The Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) is designed to compare two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents against placebo. A placebo control for two active treatments can be achieved in several ways, each of which may have different implications for the logistics of drug supply, enrollment, adherence to treatment, and the validity of specific treatment comparisons. The authors outline the placebo designs considered in ADAPT, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and provide their rationale for and the consequences of the selection of the double placebo design.

Breitner JC, Haneuse SJ, Walker R, Dublin S, Crane PK, Gray SL, Larson EB. · Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #19386997 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may prevent Alzheimer dementia (AD). METHODS: We analyzed the association of prior NSAID exposure with incident dementia and AD in the Adult Changes in Thought population-based cohort aged > or = 65 years (median 74.8) at enrollment. Participants were members of Group Health, which provided computerized pharmacy dispensing records from 1977 onward. We studied 2,736 dementia-free enrollees with extensive prior pharmacy data, following them biennially for up to 12 years to identify dementia and AD. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed association of dementia or AD with NSAID use graded in standard daily doses (SDD) dispensed over 2 years (e.g., heavy use = 500 + SDD), with some analyses also adding consecutive biennial self-reports of NSAID use. RESULTS: Pharmacy records identified 351 participants (12.8%) with history of heavy NSAID use at enrollment. Another 107 became heavy users during follow-up. Some 476 individuals developed incident dementia, 356 with AD (median onset ages 83.5 and 83.8 years). Contrary to the hypothesis that NSAIDs protect against AD, pharmacy-defined heavy NSAID users showed increased incidence of dementia and AD, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.24) and 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.23). Addition of self-reported exposure data did not alter these results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings differ from those of other studies with younger cohorts. The results observed elsewhere may reflect delayed onset of Alzheimer dementia (AD) in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Conceivably, such delay could result in increased AD incidence in late old age. The relation of NSAID use and AD pathogenesis needs further investigation.

Wang CS, Burke JR, Steffens DC, Hulette CM, Breitner JC, Plassman BL. · Department of Psychiatry, Tainan Hospital, Department of Health, Taiwan. · J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. · Pubmed #19372291 No free full text.

Abstract: AIM: Little is known about the concordance rate in twins for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The rate of agreement between clinical and pathological diagnoses for DLB is typically low, necessitating confirmation of the diagnosis neuropathologically. METHODS: Participants were 17 twin pairs enrolled in the Duke Twins Study of Memory in Aging in which at least one member of the pair had an autopsy confirmed diagnosis of DLB, Alzheimer's disease (AD) with Lewy bodies or frontotemporal dementia with Lewy bodies. The characteristics of those with dementia were assessed and rates of concordance for pathological confirmed dementia were examined. RESULTS: Four monozygotic twin pairs had a proband with neuropathologically confirmed pure DLB; all remained discordant for dementia for periods up to 16 years or more. Five of 13 pairs in which the proband had AD plus DLB were concordant for dementia but only one pair was concordant for AD plus DLB, while the co-twins in the other four pairs had other types of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that even among twins, a diagnosis of DLB in one twin does not predict the same diagnosis in the other twin. Neuropathological discordance in type of dementia among monozygotic pairs hints at environmental or epigenetic factors playing a role in Lewy body pathology.

Anonymous00036, Meinert CL, McCaffrey LD, Breitner JC. · No affiliation provided · Alzheimers Dement. · Pubmed #19328435 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) was designed to address whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can prevent or delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: ADAPT was a randomized, double-placebo-controlled, multicenter chemoprevention trial conducted at six U.S. dementia research clinics. At entry, participants were required to test "normal" on a battery of cognitive tests and to be age 70+ with a family history of Alzheimer-like dementia. Persons were randomly assigned to 200 mg b.i.d. celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer), 220 mg b.i.d. naproxen sodium (Aleve, Bayer), or placebo. The primary outcome measure was AD. Secondary outcome measures were cognitive decline and measures related to safety of the treatments when used long term. ADAPT was designed to detect a 30% reduction in AD incidence with 80% power. The estimated sample size requirement was 2,625. RESULTS: Enrollment began in March 2001 and ended in December 2004 when treatments were suspended because of concerns regarding cardiovascular safety of the treatments. Followup ranged from 1 to 46 months. The achieved enrollment was 2,528. Recruitment was achieved primarily via mailings to people aged 70+ living in the catchment areas of the six field sites.

Rosenberg PB, Mielke MM, Tschanz J, Cook L, Corcoran C, Hayden KM, Norton M, Rabins PV, Green RC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Breitner JC, Munger R, Lyketsos CG. · Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA. · Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. · Pubmed #18978249 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that cardiovascular medications, including statins and antihypertensive medications, may delay cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer dementia (AD). We examined the association of cardiovascular medication use and rate of functional decline in a population-based cohort of individuals with incident AD. METHODS: In the Dementia Progression Study of the Cache County Study on Memory, Health, and Aging, 216 individuals with incident AD were identified and followed longitudinally with in-home visits for a mean of 3.0 years and 2.1 follow-up visits. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) was completed at each follow-up. Medication use was inventoried during in-home visits. Generalized least-squares random-effects regression was performed with CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-Sum) as the outcome and cardiovascular medication use as the major predictors. RESULTS: CDR-Sum increased an average of 1.69 points annually, indicating a steady decline in functioning. After adjustment for demographic variables and the baseline presence of cardiovascular conditions, use of statins (p = 0.03) and beta-blockers (p = 0.04) was associated with a slower annual rate of increase in CDR-Sum (slower rate of functional decline) of 0.75 and 0.68 points respectively, while diuretic use was associated with a faster rate of increase in CDR-Sum (p = 0.01; 0.96 points annually). Use of calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin, or nitrates did not affect the rate of functional decline. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of individuals with incident AD, use of statins and beta-blockers was associated with delay of functional decline. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to determine whether treatment with these medications may help delay AD progression.

Meinert CL, Breitner JC. · Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. · Alzheimers Dement. · Pubmed #18632005 No free full text.

Abstract: A randomized trial is a randomized trial. The basic ingredients do not change with different purposes whether for treatment or prevention of disease. Likewise, the problems and difficulties are mostly the same. But there are differences in approach and philosophy. Here we discuss problems in trials focused on healthy people to determine whether drugs can delay or prevent adverse health events, with the Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) as an example. An important difference separating treatment trials from prevention trials is the length of time needed to demonstrate a difference with treatment. Related to this is the risk-benefit calculus of the trial. Treatment trials are aimed at "curing" or ameliorating disease, for example, as with trials involving people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia to determine whether treatment is useful in dealing with the AD-induced dementia. Like other treatment trials, those targeting AD dementia balance these benefits against the risks of treatment. But by contrast, benefit in prevention trials, if any, will be found only in the absence or delay in disease onset, often after years of continuous treatment. As in ADAPT, the separation in timing of risk versus benefit often brings difficult decisions about how long to continue the trial in the absence of any apparent benefit to treatment. Other difficulties similarly relate to the length of prevention trials. In hopes that some lessons learned from ADAPT will assist future prevention trials, especially in the elderly, we describe several conundrums and problems experienced in this trial and attempt when possible to extend our observations to the larger class of long-term drug prevention trials.

Szekely CA, Green RC, Breitner JC, Østbye T, Beiser AS, Corrada MM, Dodge HH, Ganguli M, Kawas CH, Kuller LH, Psaty BM, Resnick SM, Wolf PA, Zonderman AB, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Zandi PP. · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. · Neurology. · Pubmed #18509093 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Observational studies show reduced incidence of Alzheimer dementia (AD) in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). One hypothesis holds that the subset of NSAIDs known as selective A beta(42)-lowering agents (SALAs) is responsible for this apparent reduction in AD risk. METHODS: We pooled individual-level data from six prospective studies to obtain a sufficient sample to examine AD risk in users of SALA vs non-SALA NSAIDs. RESULTS: Of 13,499 initially dementia-free participants (70,863 person-years), 820 developed incident AD. Users of NSAIDs (29.6%) showed reduced risk of AD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.91). The point estimates were similar for SALAs (aHR 0.87, CI 0.72-1.04) and non-SALAs (aHR 0.75, CI 0.56-1.01). Because 573 NSAID users (14.5%) reported taking both a SALA and non-SALA, we examined their use alone and in combination. Resulting aHRs were 0.82 (CI 0.67-0.99) for SALA only, 0.60 (CI 0.40-0.90) for non-SALA only, and 0.87 (CI 0.57-1.33) for both NSAIDs (Wald test for differences, p = 0.32). The 40.7% of participants who used aspirin also showed reduced risk of AD, even when they used no other NSAIDs (aHR 0.78, CI 0.66-0.92). By contrast, there was no association with use of acetaminophen (aHR 0.93, CI 0.76-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled dataset, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use reduced the risk of Alzheimer dementia (AD). However, there was no apparent advantage in AD risk reduction for the subset of NSAIDs shown to selectively lower A beta(42), suggesting that all conventional NSAIDs including aspirin have a similar protective effect in humans.

Anonymous00079, Martin BK, Szekely C, Brandt J, Piantadosi S, Breitner JC, Craft S, Evans D, Green R, Mullan M. · No affiliation provided · Arch Neurol. · Pubmed #18474729 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown reduced risk of Alzheimer dementia in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of naproxen sodium and celecoxib on cognitive function in older adults. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked chemoprevention trial. SETTING: Six US memory clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged 70 years and older with a family history of Alzheimer disease; 2117 of 2528 enrolled had follow-up cognitive assessment. INTERVENTIONS: Celecoxib (200 mg twice daily), naproxen sodium (220 mg twice daily), or placebo, randomly allocated in a ratio of 1:1:1.5, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seven tests of cognitive function and a global summary score measured annually. RESULTS: Longitudinal analyses showed lower global summary scores over time for naproxen compared with placebo (- 0.05 SDs; P = .02) and lower scores on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination over time for both treatment groups compared with placebo (- 0.33 points for celecoxib [P = .04] and - 0.36 points for naproxen [P = .02]). Restriction of analyses to measures collected from persons without dementia attenuated the treatment group differences. Analyses limited to measures obtained while participants were being issued study drugs produced results similar to the intention-to-treat analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of naproxen or celecoxib did not improve cognitive function. There was weak evidence for a detrimental effect of naproxen.

Hallam BJ, Brown WS, Ross C, Buckwalter JG, Bigler ED, Tschanz JT, Norton MC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Breitner JC. · The Travis Research Institute, Center for Biopsychosocial Research, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, California, USA. · J Int Neuropsychol Soc. · Pubmed #18419840 No free full text.

Abstract: The regional distribution of degeneration of the corpus callosum (CC) in dementia is not yet clear. This study compared regional CC size in participants (n = 179) from the Cache County Memory and Aging Study. Participants represented a range of cognitive function: Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), mild ambiguous (MA-cognitive problems, but not severe enough for diagnosis of dementia), and healthy older adults. CC outlines obtained from midsagittal magnetic resonance images were divided into 99 equally spaced widths. Factor analysis of these callosal widths identified 10 callosal regions. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant group differences for anterior and posterior callosal regions. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons of CC regions in patient groups as compared to the control group (controlling for age) revealed trends toward smaller anterior and posterior regions, but not all were statistically significant. As compared to controls, significantly smaller anterior and posterior CC regions were found in the AD group; significantly smaller anterior CC regions in the VaD group; but no significant CC regional differences in the MA group. Findings suggest that dementia-related CC atrophy occurs primarily in the anterior and posterior portions.

Treiber KA, Lyketsos CG, Corcoran C, Steinberg M, Norton M, Green RC, Rabins P, Stein DM, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Breitner JC, Tschanz JT. · Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, U.S.A. · Int Psychogeriatr. · Pubmed #18289451 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine, in an exploratory analysis, the association between vascular conditions and the occurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in a population-based sample of incident Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: The sample consisted of 254 participants, identified through two waves of assessment. NPS were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Prior to the onset of AD, data regarding a history of stroke, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart attack or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and diabetes were recorded. Logistic regression procedures were used to examine the relationship of each vascular condition to individual neuropsychiatric symptoms. Covariates considered were age, gender, education, APOE genotype, dementia severity, and overall health status. RESULTS: One or more NPS were observed in 51% of participants. Depression was most common (25.8%), followed by apathy (18.6%), and irritability (17.7%). Least common were elation (0.8%), hallucinations (5.6%), and disinhibition (6.0%). Stroke prior to the onset of AD was associated with increased risk of delusions (OR = 4.76, p = 0.02), depression (OR = 3.87, p = 0.03), and apathy (OR = 4.48, p = 0.02). Hypertension was associated with increased risk of delusions (OR = 2.34, p = 0.02), anxiety (OR = 4.10, p = 0.002), and agitation/aggression (OR = 2.82, p = 0.01). No associations were observed between NPS and diabetes, hyperlipidemia, heart attack or CABG, or overall health. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that a history of stroke and hypertension increase the risk of specific NPS in patients with AD. These conditions may disrupt neural circuitry in brain areas involved in NPS. Findings may provide an avenue for reduction in occurrence of NPS through the treatment or prevention of vascular risk conditions.