Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Thompson MA

Yeni PG, Hammer SM, Carpenter CC, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, Gazzard BG, Hirsch MS, Jacobsen DM, Katzenstein DA, Montaner JS, Richman DD, Saag MS, Schechter M, Schooley RT, Thompson MA, Vella S, Volberding PA. · Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Department of Infectious Diseases, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, Paris, Cedex 18 France 75877. · JAMA. · Pubmed #12095387 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: New information warrants updated recommendations for the 4 central issues in antiretroviral therapy: when to start, what drugs to start with, when to change, and what to change to. These updated recommendations are intended to guide practicing physicians actively involved in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related care. PARTICIPANTS: In 1995, physicians with specific expertise in HIV-related basic science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient care were invited by the International AIDS Society-USA to serve on a volunteer panel. In 1999, others were invited to broaden international representation. The 17-member panel met regularly in closed meetings between its last report in 2000 and April 2002 to review current data. The effort was sponsored and funded by the International AIDS Society-USA, a not-for-profit physician education organization. EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS PROCESS: The full panel was convened in late 2000 and assigned 7 section committees. A section writer and 3 to 5 section committee members (each panel member served on numerous sections) identified relevant evidence and prepared draft recommendations. Basic science, clinical research, and epidemiologic data from the published literature and abstracts from recent (within 2 years) scientific conferences were considered by strength of evidence. Extrapolations from basic science data and expert opinion of the panel members were included as evidence. Draft sections were combined and circulated to the entire panel and discussed in a series of full-panel conference calls until consensus was reached. Final recommendations represent full consensus agreement of the panel. CONCLUSIONS: Because of increased awareness of the activity and toxicity of current drugs, the threshold for initiation of therapy has shifted to a later time in the course of HIV disease. However, the optimal time to initiate therapy remains imprecisely defined. Availability of new drugs has broadened options for therapy initiation and management of treatment failure, which remains a difficult challenge.

Baxter JD, Mayers DL, Wentworth DN, Neaton JD, Hoover ML, Winters MA, Mannheimer SB, Thompson MA, Abrams DI, Brizz BJ, Ioannidis JP, Merigan TC. · Cooper Hospital/UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ, USA. · AIDS. · Pubmed #10894268 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term effects of using genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) with expert advice in the management of patients failing on a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Multicenter community-based clinical trials network. PATIENTS: One-hundred and fifty-three HIV-infected adults with a threefold or greater rise in plasma HIV-1 RNA on at least 16 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization was either to a GART group, where genotype interpretation and suggested regimens were provided to clinicians, or to a no-GART group, where treatment choices were made without such input. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization. The primary endpoint was change in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline to the average of the 4 and 8 week levels. RESULTS: The average baseline CD4 cell count was 230 x 10(6) cells/l and the median HIV-1 RNA was 28,085 copies/ml. At entry, 82 patients were failing on regimens containing indinavir, 51 on nelfinavir, 11 on ritonavir, and nine on saquinavir. HIV-1 RNA, averaged at 4 and 8 weeks, decreased by 1.19 log10 for the 78 GART patients and -0.61 log10 for the 75 no-GART patients (treatment difference: -0.53 log, 95% confidence interval, -0.77 to -0.29; P = 0.00001). Overall, the best virologic responses occurred in patients who received three or more drugs to which their HIV-1 appeared to be susceptible. CONCLUSION: In patients failing triple drug therapy, GART with expert advice was superior to no-GART as measured by short-term viral load responses.

Chapman LE, Green TA, Ahmed F, Parekh BS, Rimland D, Kaplan JE, Thompson MA, Folks TM. · HIV and Retrovirology Branch, Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Centers for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. · AIDS. · Pubmed #10894277 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Immune stimulation of CD4 lymphocytes is thought to enhance HIV-1 replication in vivo. Therefore, we sought to define the impact of clinical events identified as putative immune activators on the variability of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in persons with CD4 cell counts greater than 500 x 10(6) cells/l. DESIGN: We prospectively recorded clinical events and measured plasma HIV-1 RNA levels weekly for 24 weeks in 16 HIV-1-infected adults who were not receiving antiretroviral therapy and who had CD4 cell counts greater than 500 x 10(6) cells/l. METHODS: Standard weekly interviews were conducted to capture potential immune activators (e.g., infections, immunizations, and allergic reactions). All plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were measured using the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, New Jersey, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: Participants had remarkably stable viral loads during the 6 month study period. Infections were significantly more frequent during the 7 days prior to individual HIV-1 RNA measurements that exceeded the assay variation thresholds determined for this study (+/- 0.324 log) than during the comparable time periods preceding stable measurements (P = 0.023). As a group, the eight participants who had one to four HIV-1 RNA measurements that exceeded the thresholds experienced more infections and declining CD4 cell counts over the study course compared to the eight participants whose measurements all fell within the thresholds (P = 0.058 and 0.053 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in untreated HIV-1-infected persons with CD4 cell count greater than 500 x 10(6) cells/l, viral load is generally quite stable, although acute minor infections are associated with transient fluctuations generally lasting no more than 1 week.