Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Jacobsen DM

Yeni PG, Hammer SM, Carpenter CC, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, Gazzard BG, Hirsch MS, Jacobsen DM, Katzenstein DA, Montaner JS, Richman DD, Saag MS, Schechter M, Schooley RT, Thompson MA, Vella S, Volberding PA. · Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Department of Infectious Diseases, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, Paris, Cedex 18 France 75877. · JAMA. · Pubmed #12095387 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: New information warrants updated recommendations for the 4 central issues in antiretroviral therapy: when to start, what drugs to start with, when to change, and what to change to. These updated recommendations are intended to guide practicing physicians actively involved in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related care. PARTICIPANTS: In 1995, physicians with specific expertise in HIV-related basic science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient care were invited by the International AIDS Society-USA to serve on a volunteer panel. In 1999, others were invited to broaden international representation. The 17-member panel met regularly in closed meetings between its last report in 2000 and April 2002 to review current data. The effort was sponsored and funded by the International AIDS Society-USA, a not-for-profit physician education organization. EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS PROCESS: The full panel was convened in late 2000 and assigned 7 section committees. A section writer and 3 to 5 section committee members (each panel member served on numerous sections) identified relevant evidence and prepared draft recommendations. Basic science, clinical research, and epidemiologic data from the published literature and abstracts from recent (within 2 years) scientific conferences were considered by strength of evidence. Extrapolations from basic science data and expert opinion of the panel members were included as evidence. Draft sections were combined and circulated to the entire panel and discussed in a series of full-panel conference calls until consensus was reached. Final recommendations represent full consensus agreement of the panel. CONCLUSIONS: Because of increased awareness of the activity and toxicity of current drugs, the threshold for initiation of therapy has shifted to a later time in the course of HIV disease. However, the optimal time to initiate therapy remains imprecisely defined. Availability of new drugs has broadened options for therapy initiation and management of treatment failure, which remains a difficult challenge.

Gerbert B, Moe JC, Saag MS, Benson CA, Jacobsen DM, Feraios A, Hill ME, Bronstone A, Caspers N, Volberding PA. · Division of Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94117, USA. · AIDS Patient Care STDS. · Pubmed #11445014 No free full text.

Abstract: Medical care for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons has grown increasingly complex, yet few studies have examined experienced HIV physicians' views about current HIV medical care. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between physicians' HIV experience, self-perceived expertise, and confidence with providing 18 aspects of HIV medical care and between confidence in aspects of care and medical specialty. At geographically diverse, HIV continuing medical education programs conducted in the fall of 1999, 359 currently practicing HIV physicians completed a written survey measuring participants' demographic characteristics, experience, HIV expertise, and level of confidence providing essential aspects of HIV care. Participants currently managed a median of 50 HIV-infected patients with a career total of 300. Significant correlations were found between experience and expertise items and experience and 15 of 18 confidence items. Confidence levels varied from 11% to 85% highly confident across 18 aspects of HIV care. Physicians' confidence with providing aspects of HIV care varied by the three predominant specialty groups (infectious diseases, internal medicine, and family practice/general medicine). Physicians who have informally specialized in HIV care reported a range of self-perceived expertise and confidence, indicating the complexity of HIV medical care today. Our results suggest that even the most experienced HIV physicians in the United States continue to benefit from more experience and that each medical specialty examined in this study brings its own set of skills needed to provide optimal HIV care. This study constitutes a first step toward defining and formalizing HIV medical care.