Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Clotet B

Iribarren JA, Labarga P, Rubio R, Berenguer J, Miró JM, Antela A, González J, Moreno S, Arrizabalaga J, Chamorro L, Clotet B, Gatell JM, López-Aldeguer J, Martínez E, Polo R, Tuset M, Viciana P, Santamaría JM, Kindelán JM, Ribera E, Segura F, Anonymous00086, Anonymous00087. · Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #15596051 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each of these situations. RESULTS: ART consisting of at least three drugs is currently the initial treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection. These regimens should include 2 NRTI + 1 NNRTI or 2 NRTI + 1 PI. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts per L and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) Therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of < 200 cells/microL; 2) Therapy should be started in most patients with CD4+ counts of 200-350 cells/microL, although it can be delayed when CD4+ count persists at around 350 cells/microL and viral load is low; and 3) Initiation of therapy can be delayed in patients with CD4+ counts of > 350 cells/microL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross resistance, therapeutic options are limited when ART fails. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. Toxicity is a limiting factor in the use of ART, although the benefits outweigh the risks. In addition, the criteria for the use of ART are discussed in situations of acute infection, pregnancy, and post-exposure prophylaxis, and in the management of co-infection of HIV with HCV or HBV. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the possibility to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Rubio R, Berenguer J, Miró JM, Antela A, Iribarren JA, González J, Guerra L, Moreno S, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Laguna F, Martínez E, Parras F, Santamaría JM, Tuset M, Viciana P. · Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #12084354 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To provide an update of recommendation on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in HIV-infected adults.Methods. These recommendations have been agreed by consensus by a committee of the spanish AIDS Study Group (GESIDA) and the National AIDS Plan. To do so, advances in the physiopathology of AIDS and the results on efficacy and safety in clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetics studies published in biomedical journals or presented at congresses in the last few years have been reviewed. Three levels of evidence have been defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), case-control or cohort studies (level B) and expert opinion (level C). Whether to recommend, consider, or not to recommend ART has been established for each situation. RESULTS: Currently, ART with combinations of at least three drugs constitutes the treatment of choice in chronic HIV infection. In patients with symptomatic HIV infection, initiation of ART is recommended. In asymptomatic patients initiation of ART should be based on the CD41/mL lymphocyte count and on the plasma viral load (PVL): a) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes < 200 cells/mL, initiation of ART is recommended; b) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes between 200 and 300 cells/mL, initiation of ART should, in most cases, be recommended; however, it could be delayed when the CD41 lymphocyte count remains close to 350 cells/mL and the PVL is low, and c) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes > 350 cells/mL, initiation of ART can be delayed. The aim of ART is to achieve an undetectable PVL. Adherence to ART plays a role in the durability of the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross-resistance, the therapeutic options in treatment failure are limited. In these cases, genotypic analysis is useful. Toxicity limits ART. The criteria for ART in acute infection, pregnancy and postexposure prophylaxis and in the management of coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C and B virus are controversial. CONCLUSIONS: The current approach to initiating ART is more conservative than in previous recommendations. In asymptomatic patients, the CD41 lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART. Because of the considerable number of drugs available, more sensitive monitoring methods (PVL) and the possibility of determining resistance, therapeutic strategies have become much more individualized.

Miró JM, Antela A, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Guerra L, Antonio Iribarren J, Laguna F, Moreno S, Parras F, Rubio R, Santamaría JM, Viciana P, Anonymous00076. · Hospital Clínic Universitari, Barcelona. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #11153204 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for antiretroviral therapy (ART) in adult HIV-infected persons according to the new scientific advances and the existence of new antiretroviral drugs in the last two years. METHODS: The ART recommendations have been condensed by a panel of experts from the Spanish AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio de Sida-GESIDA) of the Spanish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Society (SEIMC) and from the Clinical Advisory Panel (CAP) of the Secretariat of the Spanish National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) of the Ministry of Health. Three levels of evidence have been established depending if the data came from randomized and controlled studies, from cohort or case-control studies or from descriptive studies and expert opinions, for that purpose we have reviewed the advanced in HIV pathophysiology and results of efficacy (clinical, virologic and immunologic) and security (toxicity) from clinical trials involving ART lasting at least 12 months, from cohort studies and pharmacokinetic and security data of antoiretrovírico drugs, presented in international conferences or published in biomedical journals in the last two years. In each situation we have established either to recommend or to consider or not recommend ART. RESULTS: Nowadays, ART consistent of at least three drugs constitutes the election therapy for chronic HIV infection, since it delays clinical progression, increases significantly the survival and diminishes hospital admissions and associated costs. The decision to start ART must be based upon three elements: presence or absence of symptoms, plasma vírica load and CD4+ cells counts. Thus, in asymptomatic cases with a high CD4+ cells count (> 500/microliter) and low vírica load (< 10,000 copies/ml by branched DNA bDNA or < 20,000 copies/ml by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] or nucleic acid sequence based amplification [NASBA]) we recommend to delay ART. In symptomatic patients we recommend to start it, and in asymptomatic patients, we could recommend or consider ART initiation depending on the risk of progression, established by the vírica load and the CD4+ cells count. In any case, if therapy is started, the objective must be to reach an indetectable vírica load (< 50 copies/ml). The adherence to ART plays a key role for its initial moment and for the duration of the antiviral response. ART can achieve a restoration of cellular immunity inb the advanced patients. There are few therapeutic options in failing patients due to cross-resistance. Resistance studies can be useful in this setting. The toxicity (lypodistrophy) is a new and limiting factor of ART which requires to look for new therapeutic options. ART criteria for acute infection, pregnancy, post-exposure prophylaxis and when to use resistance testing are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In this moment, there is a more conservative attitude towards starting ART than in previous recommendations in which a virus eradication was considered. On the other hand, the high number of disposable drugs, the more sensitive monitorization methods (plasma vírica load) and the possibility of performing resistance studies make therapeutic strategies more dynamic and individualized for each patient and situation. In any case, it is mandatory to ensure a perfect adherence to ART from the patients.

Miró JM, Antela A, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Guerra L, Iribarren JA, Laguna F, Moreno S, Parras F, Rubio R, Santamaría JM, Viciana P. · Hospital Clínic Universitari, Barcelona. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #11109725 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for antiretroviral therapy in adult HIV-infected persons according to the new scientific advances and the existence of new antiretroviral drugs in the last two years. METHODS: The antiretroviral therapy recommendations have been condensed by a panel of experts from the Spanish AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio de sida-GESIDA) of the Spanish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Society (SEIMC) and from the Clinical Advisory Panel of the Secretariat of the Spanish National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) of the Ministry of Health. Three levels of evidence have been established depending if the data came from randomised and controlled studies, from cohort or case-control studies or from descriptive studies and expert opinions. For that purpose we have reviewed the advances in HIV pathophysiology and results of efficacy (clinical, virologic and immunologic) and security (toxicity) from clinical trials involving antiretroviral therapy lasting at least 12 months, from cohort studies and pharmacokinetic and security data of antiretroviral drugs, presented in international conferences or published in biomedical journals in the last two years. In each situation we have established either to recommend or to consider or not recommend antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: Nowadays, antiretroviral therapy consisting of at least three drugs constitutes the election therapy for chronic HIV infection, since it delays clinical progression, increases significantly the survival and diminishes hospital admissions and associated costs. The decision to start antiretroviral therapy must be based upon three elements: presence or absence of symptoms, plasma viral load and CD4+ cells counts. Thus, in asymptomatic cases with a high CD4+ cells count (> 500/microL) and low viral load (< 10,000 copies/ml by branched DNA [bDNA] or < 20,000 copies/ml by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] or nucleic acid sequence based amplification [NASBA]) we recommend to delay antiretroviral therapy. In symptomatic patients we recommend to start it, and in asymptomatic patients, we could recommend or consider antiretroviral therapy initiation depending on the risk of progression, established by the viral load and the CD4+ cells count. In any case, if therapy is started, the objective must be to reach an undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/ml). The adherence to antiretroviral therapy plays a key role for its initial moment and for the duration of the antiviral response, antiretroviral therapy can achieve a restoration of cellular immunity in the advanced patients. There are few therapeutic options in failing patients due to cross-resistance. Resistance studies can be useful in this setting. The toxicity is a new and limiting factor of antiretroviral therapy which requires to look for new therapeutic options. Antiretroviral therapy criteria for acute infection, pregnancy, post-exposure prophylaxis and when to use resistance testing are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In this moment, there is a more conservative attitude towards starting antiretroviral therapy than in previous recommendations in which a virus eradication was considered. On the other hand, the high number of disposable drugs, the more sensitive monitorization methods (plasma viral load) and the possibility of performing resistance studies make therapeutic strategies more dynamic and individualised for each patient and situation. In any case, it is mandatory to ensure a perfect adherence to antiretroviral therapy from the patients.

Vandamme AM, Houyez F, Bànhegyi D, Clotet B, De Schrijver G, De Smet KA, Hall WW, Harrigan R, Hellmann N, Hertogs K, Holtzer C, Larder B, Pillay D, Race E, Schmit JC, Schuurman R, Schulse E, Sönnerborg A, Miller V. · AIDS Reference Laboratory, Rega Institute and University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Belgium. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #11417759 No free full text.

Abstract: HIV drug resistance is one of the major limitations in the successful treatment of HIV-infected patients using currently available antiretroviral combination therapies. When appropriate, drug susceptibility profiles should be taken into consideration in the choice of a specific combination therapy. Guidelines recommending resistance testing in certain circumstances have been issued. Many clinicians have access to resistance testing and will increasingly use these results in their treatment decisions. In this document, we comment on the different methods available, and the relevant issues relating to the clinical application of these tests. Specifically, the following recommendations can be made: (i) genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 drug resistance analyses can yield complementary information for the clinician. However, insufficient information currently exists as to which approach is preferable in any particular clinical setting; (ii) when HIV-1 drug resistance testing is required, it is recommended that testing be performed on plasma samples obtained before starting, stopping or changing therapy, on samples that have a viral load above the detection limit of the resistance test; (iii) the panel recommends that genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 drug resistance testing for clinical purposes be performed in a certified laboratory under strict quality control and quality assurance standards; and (iv) the panel recommends that resistance testing laboratories provide clinicians with resistance reports that include a list of drug-related resistance mutations (genotype) and/or a list of drug-related fold resistance values (phenotype), with interpretations of each by an experienced virologist. The interpretation of genotypic and phenotypic analysis is a complex and developing science, and in order to understand HIV-1 drug resistance reports, communication between the requesting clinician and the expert that interpreted the resistance report is recommended.

Negredo E, Paredes R, Bonjoch A, Tuldrà A, Fumaz CR, Gel S, Garcés B, Johnston S, Arnó A, Balagué M, Jou A, Tural C, Sirera G, Romeu J, Cruz L, Francia E, Domingo P, Arrizabalaga J, Ruiz I, Arribas JR, Ruiz L, Clotet B. · Fundació Lluita contra la SIDA, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #16021868 No free full text.

Abstract: This multicentre, randomized, open-label, prospective trial is evaluating the effects of switching treatment from a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen to one containing the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with durable viral suppression but suffering from lipodystrophy. Objectives of this ongoing study are to evaluate the effects of this switch on changes in body shape and metabolic abnormalities associated with acquired HIV-related lipodystrophy syndrome (AHL), as well as on maintenance of viral suppression and immunological and psychological effects. Preliminary data involving 57 patients with 3 months of follow-up show an initial improvement of AHL in two regions, the face and arms. There is also a tendency toward improved cholesterol and triglyceride levels and improved quality of life among patients receiving the nevirapine-containing regimen. Maintenance of viral suppression was equivalent in both treatment groups. Additional data with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Martinez-Picado J, Negredo E, Ruiz L, Shintani A, Fumaz CR, Zala C, Domingo P, Vilaró J, Llibre JM, Viciana P, Hertogs K, Boucher C, D'Aquila RT, Clotet B, Anonymous00317. · IrsiCaixa Foundation, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #12859157 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling has suggested that alternating antiretroviral regimens while patients' viral load remains suppressed would minimize HIV resistance mutations. OBJECTIVE: To compare alternation of antiretroviral regimens with the current standard of switching regimens after viral load rebound. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, open-label, pilot trial. SETTING: 15 outpatient HIV clinics in Spain and Argentina. PATIENTS: 161 HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naive persons. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to continuously receive stavudine, didanosine, and efavirenz (standard of care, regimen A) or zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir (standard of care, regimen B) until virologic failure, or to alternate between those two regimens every 3 months while viral load was suppressed (regimen C). MEASUREMENTS: Time to virologic failure, percentage of patients with undetectable plasma viremia over 48 weeks, CD4 and CD8 cell counts, adverse events, emergence of drug resistance, drug adherence, and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients receiving standard-of-care regimens A and B did not differ. Virologic failure over 48 weeks was delayed in the alternating therapy group compared with the pooled standard-of-care group (incidence rate, 1.2 events/1000 person-weeks [95% CI, 0.3 to 3.6 events/1000 person-weeks] vs. 4.8 events/1000 person-weeks [CI, 2.9 to 7.4 events/1000 person-weeks]; P = 0.01). Genotypic drug resistance emerged in 79% of patients in the standard-of-care group who experienced on-therapy treatment failure. Patients in the standard-of-care and alternating therapy groups had similar CD4 cell counts, frequency of adverse events, reported drug adherence, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Virologic outcome was better with alternating therapy than with the current standard of care, while adverse events and adherence were similar. The strategy of alternating therapy merits further investigation.

Mocroft A, Phillips AN, Friis-Møller N, Colebunders R, Johnson AM, Hirschel B, Saint-Marc T, Staub T, Clotet B, Lundgren JD, Anonymous00146. · Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #12008784 No free full text.

Abstract: There is an increasing proportion of HIV-positive patients exposed to all licensed classes of antiretrovirals, and the response to salvage regimens may be poor. Among over 8500 patients in EuroSIDA, the proportion of treated patients exposed to nucleosides, protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) increased from 0% in 1996 to 47% in 2001. Four-hundred-and-thirteen patients, who had failed virologically two highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens and experienced all three main drug classes, started a salvage regimen of at least three drugs, in which at least one new PI or NNRTI was included. Median viral load was 4.7 log copies/ml [Interquartile range (IQR) 4.2-5.2], CD4 lymphocyte count 150/mm3 (IQR 60-274/mm3) and follow-up 14 months. Of these patients, 283 (69%) subsequently experienced at least a 1 log decline in viral load and 202 (49%) achieved a viral load < 500 copies/ml. Conversely, the CD4 count halved from the baseline value in 88 (21%), and 45 (11%) experienced a new AIDS-defining disease. In multivariable analyses, a 1 log viral load reduction was related to baseline viral load [relative hazard (RH) 1.27 per 1 log higher; P = 0.008], a previous viral load of less than 500 copies/ml (RH 1.69; P = 0.002), more recent initiation of the regimen (RH 1.36 per year more recent; P = 0.02), number of new drugs in the regimen (RH 1.20 per drug; P = 0.02), time since start of antiretroviral therapy (RH 0.94 per extra year; P = 0.035) and time spent on HAART with viral load > 1000 copies/ml (RH 0.96 per extra month; P = 0.0001). Analysis of factors associated with CD4 count decline and new AIDS disease also indicated improved outcomes in more recent times and a tendency for a better response in those starting more new drugs, but no relationship with the total number of drugs. Outcomes in people starting salvage regimens appear to depend on the number of new drugs started but not on the total number of drugs being used.

Cozzi-Lepri A, Phillips AN, Clotet B, Mocroft A, Ruiz L, Kirk O, Lazzarin A, Wiercinska-Drapalo A, Karlsson A, Lundgren JD, Anonymous00013. · Research Department of Infection & Population Health, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK. · AIDS. · Pubmed #18832882 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the relationship between detection of HIV drug resistance by 2 years from starting antiretroviral therapy and the subsequent risk of progression to AIDS and death. DESIGN: Virological failure was defined as experiencing two consecutive viral loads of more than 400 copies/ml in the time window between 0.5 and 2 years from starting antiretroviral therapy (baseline). Patients were grouped according to evidence of virological failure and whether there was detection of the International AIDS Society resistance mutations to one, two or three drug classes in the time window. METHODS: Standard survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-fixed covariates defined at baseline was employed. RESULTS: We studied 8229 patients in EuroSIDA who started antiretroviral therapy and who had at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. We observed 829 AIDS events and 571 deaths during 38,814 person-years of follow-up resulting in an overall incidence of new AIDS and death of 3.6 per 100 person-years of follow-up [95% confidence interval (CI):3.4-3.8]. By 96 months from baseline, the proportion of patients with a new AIDS diagnosis or death was 20.3% (95% CI:17.7-22.9) in patients with no evidence of virological failure and 53% (39.3-66.7) in those with virological failure and mutations to three drug classes (P = 0.0001). An almost two-fold difference in risk was confirmed in the multivariable analysis (adjusted relative hazard = 1.8, 95% CI:1.2-2.7, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Although this study shows an association between the detection of resistance at failure and risk of clinical progression, further research is needed to clarify whether resistance reflects poor adherence or directly increases the risk of clinical events via exhaustion of drug options.

Fernàndez G, Llano A, Esgleas M, Clotet B, Esté JA, Martínez MA. · Fundacio irsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Badalona, Spain. · J Gen Virol. · Pubmed #16603531 links to  free full text

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is established by virus variants that use the CCR5 co-receptor for entry (CCR5-tropic or R5 variants), whereas viruses that use CXCR4 as co-receptor (CXCR4-tropic or X4 variants) emerge during disease progression in approximately 50 % of infected subjects. X4 variants may have a higher fitness ex vivo and their detection is usually accompanied by faster T-cell depletion and the onset of AIDS in HIV-1-positive individuals. Here, the relationship between the sequence variation of the HIV-1 env V3-V5 region and positive selective pressure on R5 and X4 variants from infected subjects with CD4 T cell counts below 200 cells microl(-1) was studied. A correlation was found between genetic distance and CD4(+) cell count at late stages of the disease. R5 variants that co-existed with X4 variants were significantly less heterogeneous than R5 variants from subjects without X4 variants (P < 0.0001). Similarly, X4 variants had a significantly higher diversity than R5 variants (P < 0.0001), although residues under positive selection had a similar distribution pattern in both variants. Therefore, both X4 and R5 variants were subjected to high selective pressures from the host. Furthermore, the interaction between X4 and R5 variants within the same subject resulted in a purifying selection on R5 variants, which only survived as a homogeneous virus population. These results indicate that R5 variants from X4 phenotype samples were highly homogeneous and under weakly positive selective pressures. In contrast, R5 variants from R5 phenotype samples were highly heterogeneous and subject to positive selective pressures.

Fumaz CR, Muñoz-Moreno JA, Moltó J, Negredo E, Ferrer MJ, Sirera G, Pérez-Alvarez N, Gómez G, Burger D, Clotet B. · Lluita contra la SIDA Foundation, HIV Unit-Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. · J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. · Pubmed #15793366 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Efavirenz has been associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, although little is known about its long-term toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To assess neuropsychiatric disorders and their relation to efavirenz plasma levels as well as quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence in HIV-infected patients on long-term efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Cross-sectional study comparing 60 patients on an efavirenz-based approach (EFV group) and 60 patients on a protease inhibitor-containing regimen (PI group) for at least 1 year. Adverse events, efavirenz plasma levels, quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence were assessed. RESULTS: The mean time on treatment was 91.1 +/- 39.5 weeks in the EFV group and 119.9 +/- 67.4 weeks in the PI group. Mild dizziness, sadness, mood changes, irritability, lightheadedness, nervousness, impaired concentration, abnormal dreams, and somnolence were reported more frequently in the EFV group than in the PI group (P < 0.05). Forty-nine of 60 patients presented with therapeutic efavirenz plasma levels (range: 1.0-4.0 mg/L). Efavirenz plasma levels were similar in subjects with and without neuropsychiatric disorders. No significant differences were found between the EFV group and the PI group regarding quality of life and psychologic status. Sixty percent of patients in the EFV group and 55% in the PI group reported adherence >/=95%. CONCLUSIONS: Mild and clinically tolerable neuropsychiatric disorders may persist in patients after a mean of 2 years using an efavirenz-based approach. Quality of life and psychologic status remained good in both study groups. Interventions to enhance long-term adherence should be applied in clinical practice.

Clotet B, Carmena J, Pulido F, Luque I, Rodriguez-Alcántara F, Anonymous00102. · Germans Trias i Pujol Universitary Hospital, Badalona, Spain. · HIV Clin Trials. · Pubmed #15002085 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: The main objective of the study was to evaluate patients' adherence to a fixed dose combination containing abacavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine (TZV) and to evaluate whether TZV might improve general satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) with anti-HIV treatment. METHOD: Patients with viral load (VL) <400 copies switched their antiretroviral therapy to TZV. Adherence was assessed by patient self-report and medication accountability at week 24. General satisfaction was evaluated with 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and week 24. QOL was assessed with MOS-HIV questionnaire at baseline and weeks 12 and 24. Biochemical and hematological parameters were evaluated for safety reasons. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were included in the study. Overall, 81% (intent to treat [ITT]) and 98% (per protocol [PP]) of patients reported an adherence >95%, reaching 75% and 100% among the intravenous drug user population by ITT and PP analysis, respectively. General satisfaction was significantly higher at week 24 (90 +/- 14 vs. 53 +/- 26) in both ITT and PP populations (p<.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in QOL. Total cholesterol and triglycerides levels decreased significantly at week 24 compared to baseline (p<.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who switched to TZV showed an increase in general satisfaction and high levels of adherence.

Pèrez-Olmeda M, Rubio A, Puig T, Gômez-Cano M, Ruiz L, Leal M, Clotet B, Soriano V. · Service of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #12731758 No free full text.

Abstract: The prevalence of genotypic resistance to nucleoside analogues (NA) was examined using a line probe assay (LiPA, Innogenetics, Spain) and a point mutation assay to test for codon 151 polymorphism in plasma from 34 individuals who had been exposed to NA for longer than 1 year. The testing was repeated in the same population after 6 months of being on a new potent protease inhibitor (PI)-containing antiretroviral combination. Only nine (47%) of the 19 patients initially carrying the codon 41 mutation restored zidovudine wild-type (WT) virus population. Similarly, eight (33%) out of 24 carrying the codon 215 mutation restored the wild-type variant. Two subjects carrying codon 74 didanosine mutation reverted to wild-type genotype, as well as two (18%) out of 11 harbouring the codon 184 lamivudine-resistant variant. To conclude, the extent to which drug recycling might be of benefit in subjects showing a restoration of genotypic sensitivity to former drugs needs to be explored.

Egea JM, Muga R, Sirera G, Clotet B, Tor J, Ardèvol M, Rey-Joly C, Muñoz A. · Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain. · Epidemiol Infect. · Pubmed #12403108 No free full text.

Abstract: The prevalence of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) use over time and the incidence of AIDS in a cohort of HIV-seroconverting injecting drug users (IDUs) were assessed by means of a hospital-based study of IDUs with a well documented date of HIV infection. Use of ART and clinical endpoints were assessed by hospital records. Three calendar periods (before 1992, 1992-6 and 1997-2000) were defined as corresponding to modalities of ART available. Prevalence of ART usage in each calendar period, changes in medication and, hazard of AIDS in patients reaching the same duration of HIV infection at different calendar periods were analysed. In total, 132 IDUs with a median age of 23 years at seroconversion were followed up for 6.8 years (median) (range 0.2-15.7). At the end of the study, 58 patients (44%) had developed AIDS. Before the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) 12% of patients were on ART. Starting in 1997, an increasing proportion were receiving HAART with a prevalence of 39.5% by January 2000. Taking 1992-6 as the reference category the relative hazard of AIDS during 1997-2000 was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.1-1.1) (P = 0.09). A 40% penetration of HAART in a cohort of IDUs with known dates of seroconversion resulted in a 58 % reduction of the hazard of AIDS.

Llano A, Barretina J, Gutiérrez A, Blanco J, Cabrera C, Clotet B, Esté JA. · Retrovirology Laboratory irsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08916 Badalona, Spain. · J Virol. · Pubmed #11581400 links to  free full text

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) primary infection is characterized by the use of CCR5 as a coreceptor for viral entry, which is associated with the non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) phenotype in lymphoid cells. Syncytium-inducing (SI) variants of HIV-1 appear in advanced stages of HIV-1 infection and are characterized by the use of CXCR4 as a coreceptor. The emergence of SI variants is accompanied by a rapid decrease in the number of T cells. However, it is unclear why SI variants emerge and what factors trigger the evolution of HIV from R5 to X4 variants. Interleukin-7 (IL-7), a cytokine produced by stromal cells of the thymus and bone marrow and by keratin, is known to play a key role in T-cell development. We evaluated IL-7 levels in plasma of healthy donors and HIV-positive patients and found significantly higher levels in HIV-positive patients. There was a negative correlation between circulating IL-7 levels and CD4(+) T-cell count in HIV-positive patients (r = -0.621; P < 0.001), suggesting that IL-7 may be involved in HIV-induced T-cell depletion and disease progression. IL-7 levels were higher in individuals who harbored SI variants and who had progressed to having CD4 cell counts of lower than 200 cells/microl than in individuals with NSI variants at a similar stage of disease. IL-7 induced T-cell proliferation and up-regulated CXCR4 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest a role for IL-7 in the maintenance of T-cell regeneration and depletion by HIV in infected individuals and a possible relationship between IL-7 levels and the emergence of SI variants.

Gómez-Cano M, Rubio A, Ruiz L, Pérez-Olmeda M, Leal M, Clotet B, Soriano V. · Service of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #10682158 No free full text.

Abstract: The early recognition of resistance to antiretroviral agents could allow a rapid switch in therapy and therefore avoid the accumulation of mutations and reduce the risk of cross-resistance. However, the efficiency of genotypic tests in specimens with low viral load (VL) is severely compromised since human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA in these samples often goes unrecognized. The frequency of results provided by a line probe assay (LiPA, Murex), a commercially available drug resistance test and a home-made point mutation assay (PMA) for recognizing the codon 151 multidrug-resistance mutation was examined in 664 plasma samples stratified with respect to VL values. Overall, 421 (63%) samples could be interpreted by both LiPA and PMA. The sensitivity decreased as plasma VL lowered: 89% for samples with VL > 10,000 HIV RNA copies/ml, 77% for those with VL between 500 and 10,000 HIV RNA copies/ml and 37% for specimens with VL < 500 HIV RNA copies/ml. A good agreement existed comparing the sensitivity of the home-made PMA and LiPA. Although the former tends to produce more results, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Our results support that new, more sensitive, HIV RNA extraction methods need to be implemented for the rapid recognition of drug-resistant mutants in patients experiencing an early rebound in plasma viraemia.

Rubio A, Gómez-Cano M, Puig T, Leal M, Pérez-Olmeda M, Ruiz L, Clotet B, Rey C, Zamora L, Xaus N, Soriano V. · Department of Biochemistry, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #10682128 No free full text.

Abstract: Patients harbouring drug-resistance viruses usually suffer a rise in serum viraemia after a variable period of time. We have investigated the relationship between the appearance of resistant genotypes and the viral load of each patient after treatment. Our objective was to assess the association between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA plasma levels and the number of drug resistance-associated point mutations after treatment. A total of 150 patients from three reference centres in Spain (Madrid, Barcelona and Seville) from a previous study (Erase Study) were included. Patients had at that time undergone antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogues for at least 1 year (zidovudine/didanosine; zidovudine/zalcitabine; zidovudine/zalcitabine/lamivudine; zidovudine/didanosine/lamivudine). In this study, plasma viraemia in these patients was quantified and a line probe assay was used to determine the genotype of the virus. Viral load was significantly higher in patients harbouring virus with more than three mutations than in those individuals who harboured wild-type strains (P < 0.05). Surprisingly, when patients with viral load < 500 copies/ml (13/150) were analysed, only two carried wild-type strains, whereas three had virus with more than three point mutations. The viral load of six samples was assayed using an ultrasensitive test (detection limit < 20 copies/ml). Of the three samples where viral load was < 20 copies/ml, one patient harboured wild-type virus, whereas two carried mutant virus strains. These results suggest that even in patients with undetectable viral loads by conventional methods, viral replication may continue and mutations develop. Therefore, standard values of plasma viraemia for measuring the effectiveness of the treatment should be reconsidered when patients are on antiviral regimens of just two or three nucleoside analogues.

Romeu J, Balagué M, Ruiz L, Marfil S, Gatell JM, Puig T, Arnó A, Tural C, Sirera G, Clotet B. · AIDS Care Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain. · Scand J Infect Dis. · Pubmed #10381216 No free full text.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the value of quantitative HIV-1 RNA as a predictor for the short-term risk of developing AIDS-defining events in comparison with CD4 cell counts. A total of 1,028 samples from 324 patients were analysed. Median initial CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 RNA were 249 x 10(6)/l (range 0-1400 x 10(6)/l) and 4.5 log copies/ml (range: 2.3-6.4 log copies/ml). CD4 cell counts and viral load (VL) values obtained the year before a single AIDS-indicator disease were selected to define the risk of developing that event. Cox regression models with CD4 cell counts and VL values treated as time-dependent covariates were performed to analyse the risk for developing certain events. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare CD4 cell counts and VL values as predictive markers for progression. During a median follow-up of 870 d (range 30-1381 d), 132 patients developed AIDS. Median log VL values during the year before the event were 3.6 for non-progressors and 5.2 for those who developed AIDS (p < 0.0001). Minimum log VL threshold values for developing diseases were 2.3 for tuberculosis, 3.8 for Candida esophagitis, 4.4 for wasting syndrome, 4.5 for CMV disease and 4.7 for PCP. VL values were not, however, a better predictive marker for developing specific events than were CD4 cell counts. Although we have identified VL thresholds for the risk of developing certain AIDS-indicator diseases, the indication for starting prophylactic regimens may still be based on CD4 cell counts.