Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Antela A

Iribarren JA, Labarga P, Rubio R, Berenguer J, Miró JM, Antela A, González J, Moreno S, Arrizabalaga J, Chamorro L, Clotet B, Gatell JM, López-Aldeguer J, Martínez E, Polo R, Tuset M, Viciana P, Santamaría JM, Kindelán JM, Ribera E, Segura F, Anonymous00086, Anonymous00087. · Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #15596051 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommendations for adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: To formulate these recommendations, a panel composed of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA; AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS; Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in current understanding of the pathophysiology of HIV, the safety and efficacy findings from clinical trials, and the results from cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings over the last years. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the source of the data: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not recommend ART was established in each of these situations. RESULTS: ART consisting of at least three drugs is currently the initial treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection. These regimens should include 2 NRTI + 1 NNRTI or 2 NRTI + 1 PI. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4+ lymphocyte counts per L and plasma viral load, as follows: 1) Therapy should be started in patients with CD4+ counts of < 200 cells/microL; 2) Therapy should be started in most patients with CD4+ counts of 200-350 cells/microL, although it can be delayed when CD4+ count persists at around 350 cells/microL and viral load is low; and 3) Initiation of therapy can be delayed in patients with CD4+ counts of > 350 cells/microL. The initial objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross resistance, therapeutic options are limited when ART fails. Genotype studies are useful in these cases. Toxicity is a limiting factor in the use of ART, although the benefits outweigh the risks. In addition, the criteria for the use of ART are discussed in situations of acute infection, pregnancy, and post-exposure prophylaxis, and in the management of co-infection of HIV with HCV or HBV. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the possibility to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized approach to therapy.

Rubio R, Berenguer J, Miró JM, Antela A, Iribarren JA, González J, Guerra L, Moreno S, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Laguna F, Martínez E, Parras F, Santamaría JM, Tuset M, Viciana P. · Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #12084354 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To provide an update of recommendation on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in HIV-infected adults.Methods. These recommendations have been agreed by consensus by a committee of the spanish AIDS Study Group (GESIDA) and the National AIDS Plan. To do so, advances in the physiopathology of AIDS and the results on efficacy and safety in clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetics studies published in biomedical journals or presented at congresses in the last few years have been reviewed. Three levels of evidence have been defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), case-control or cohort studies (level B) and expert opinion (level C). Whether to recommend, consider, or not to recommend ART has been established for each situation. RESULTS: Currently, ART with combinations of at least three drugs constitutes the treatment of choice in chronic HIV infection. In patients with symptomatic HIV infection, initiation of ART is recommended. In asymptomatic patients initiation of ART should be based on the CD41/mL lymphocyte count and on the plasma viral load (PVL): a) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes < 200 cells/mL, initiation of ART is recommended; b) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes between 200 and 300 cells/mL, initiation of ART should, in most cases, be recommended; however, it could be delayed when the CD41 lymphocyte count remains close to 350 cells/mL and the PVL is low, and c) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes > 350 cells/mL, initiation of ART can be delayed. The aim of ART is to achieve an undetectable PVL. Adherence to ART plays a role in the durability of the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross-resistance, the therapeutic options in treatment failure are limited. In these cases, genotypic analysis is useful. Toxicity limits ART. The criteria for ART in acute infection, pregnancy and postexposure prophylaxis and in the management of coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C and B virus are controversial. CONCLUSIONS: The current approach to initiating ART is more conservative than in previous recommendations. In asymptomatic patients, the CD41 lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART. Because of the considerable number of drugs available, more sensitive monitoring methods (PVL) and the possibility of determining resistance, therapeutic strategies have become much more individualized.

Miró JM, Antela A, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Guerra L, Antonio Iribarren J, Laguna F, Moreno S, Parras F, Rubio R, Santamaría JM, Viciana P, Anonymous00076. · Hospital Clínic Universitari, Barcelona. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #11153204 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for antiretroviral therapy (ART) in adult HIV-infected persons according to the new scientific advances and the existence of new antiretroviral drugs in the last two years. METHODS: The ART recommendations have been condensed by a panel of experts from the Spanish AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio de Sida-GESIDA) of the Spanish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Society (SEIMC) and from the Clinical Advisory Panel (CAP) of the Secretariat of the Spanish National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) of the Ministry of Health. Three levels of evidence have been established depending if the data came from randomized and controlled studies, from cohort or case-control studies or from descriptive studies and expert opinions, for that purpose we have reviewed the advanced in HIV pathophysiology and results of efficacy (clinical, virologic and immunologic) and security (toxicity) from clinical trials involving ART lasting at least 12 months, from cohort studies and pharmacokinetic and security data of antoiretrovírico drugs, presented in international conferences or published in biomedical journals in the last two years. In each situation we have established either to recommend or to consider or not recommend ART. RESULTS: Nowadays, ART consistent of at least three drugs constitutes the election therapy for chronic HIV infection, since it delays clinical progression, increases significantly the survival and diminishes hospital admissions and associated costs. The decision to start ART must be based upon three elements: presence or absence of symptoms, plasma vírica load and CD4+ cells counts. Thus, in asymptomatic cases with a high CD4+ cells count (> 500/microliter) and low vírica load (< 10,000 copies/ml by branched DNA bDNA or < 20,000 copies/ml by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] or nucleic acid sequence based amplification [NASBA]) we recommend to delay ART. In symptomatic patients we recommend to start it, and in asymptomatic patients, we could recommend or consider ART initiation depending on the risk of progression, established by the vírica load and the CD4+ cells count. In any case, if therapy is started, the objective must be to reach an indetectable vírica load (< 50 copies/ml). The adherence to ART plays a key role for its initial moment and for the duration of the antiviral response. ART can achieve a restoration of cellular immunity inb the advanced patients. There are few therapeutic options in failing patients due to cross-resistance. Resistance studies can be useful in this setting. The toxicity (lypodistrophy) is a new and limiting factor of ART which requires to look for new therapeutic options. ART criteria for acute infection, pregnancy, post-exposure prophylaxis and when to use resistance testing are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In this moment, there is a more conservative attitude towards starting ART than in previous recommendations in which a virus eradication was considered. On the other hand, the high number of disposable drugs, the more sensitive monitorization methods (plasma vírica load) and the possibility of performing resistance studies make therapeutic strategies more dynamic and individualized for each patient and situation. In any case, it is mandatory to ensure a perfect adherence to ART from the patients.

Miró JM, Antela A, Arrizabalaga J, Clotet B, Gatell JM, Guerra L, Iribarren JA, Laguna F, Moreno S, Parras F, Rubio R, Santamaría JM, Viciana P. · Hospital Clínic Universitari, Barcelona. · Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. · Pubmed #11109725 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for antiretroviral therapy in adult HIV-infected persons according to the new scientific advances and the existence of new antiretroviral drugs in the last two years. METHODS: The antiretroviral therapy recommendations have been condensed by a panel of experts from the Spanish AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio de sida-GESIDA) of the Spanish Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Society (SEIMC) and from the Clinical Advisory Panel of the Secretariat of the Spanish National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) of the Ministry of Health. Three levels of evidence have been established depending if the data came from randomised and controlled studies, from cohort or case-control studies or from descriptive studies and expert opinions. For that purpose we have reviewed the advances in HIV pathophysiology and results of efficacy (clinical, virologic and immunologic) and security (toxicity) from clinical trials involving antiretroviral therapy lasting at least 12 months, from cohort studies and pharmacokinetic and security data of antiretroviral drugs, presented in international conferences or published in biomedical journals in the last two years. In each situation we have established either to recommend or to consider or not recommend antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: Nowadays, antiretroviral therapy consisting of at least three drugs constitutes the election therapy for chronic HIV infection, since it delays clinical progression, increases significantly the survival and diminishes hospital admissions and associated costs. The decision to start antiretroviral therapy must be based upon three elements: presence or absence of symptoms, plasma viral load and CD4+ cells counts. Thus, in asymptomatic cases with a high CD4+ cells count (> 500/microL) and low viral load (< 10,000 copies/ml by branched DNA [bDNA] or < 20,000 copies/ml by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] or nucleic acid sequence based amplification [NASBA]) we recommend to delay antiretroviral therapy. In symptomatic patients we recommend to start it, and in asymptomatic patients, we could recommend or consider antiretroviral therapy initiation depending on the risk of progression, established by the viral load and the CD4+ cells count. In any case, if therapy is started, the objective must be to reach an undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/ml). The adherence to antiretroviral therapy plays a key role for its initial moment and for the duration of the antiviral response, antiretroviral therapy can achieve a restoration of cellular immunity in the advanced patients. There are few therapeutic options in failing patients due to cross-resistance. Resistance studies can be useful in this setting. The toxicity is a new and limiting factor of antiretroviral therapy which requires to look for new therapeutic options. Antiretroviral therapy criteria for acute infection, pregnancy, post-exposure prophylaxis and when to use resistance testing are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: In this moment, there is a more conservative attitude towards starting antiretroviral therapy than in previous recommendations in which a virus eradication was considered. On the other hand, the high number of disposable drugs, the more sensitive monitorization methods (plasma viral load) and the possibility of performing resistance studies make therapeutic strategies more dynamic and individualised for each patient and situation. In any case, it is mandatory to ensure a perfect adherence to antiretroviral therapy from the patients.

Pérez-Elías MJ, Moreno S, Gutiérrez C, López D, Abraira V, Moreno A, Dronda F, Casado JL, Antela A, Rodríguez MA. · Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. · AIDS. · Pubmed #15821395 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Regimens with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) plus tenofovir DF have been associated with a high failure rate when administered as first line therapy. Little is known about patients with undetectable viral loads who are switched to these regimens. METHODS: A post-hoc review of the virological outcomes at 24 weeks of patients who switched from a successful (< 50 copies/ml) highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen to a tenofovir plus two NRTI combination. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients started a two NRTI plus tenofovir regimen mostly because of previous toxicity/intolerance of the original drugs (74%). After 24 weeks, only 17 patients (31%) remained virologically suppressed. Patients with a regimen including a didanosine plus tenofovir-based regimen had significantly poorer outcomes than those on other combinations (success rate 5 versus 47.1%, P = 0.001). In contrast, patients on a regimen including zidovudine plus tenofovir showed a trend towards a better outcome (75 versus 27%, P = 0.083). Multivariate analysis confirmed the combination of didanosine plus tenofovir as the only variable associated with a higher rate of failure (odds ratio 17.7; 95% confidence interval 2.1-147; P = 0.007). Patients with previous reverse transcriptase mutations presented virological failure in all cases. At failure a new pattern, including the K65R mutation with M184V or thymidine analogue mutations, was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Even in patients with suppressed viraemia, a two NRTI plus tenofovir regimen is associated with a high virological failure rate, but significant variations are found depending on the nucleosides included.

Aranzabal L, Casado JL, Moya J, Quereda C, Diz S, Moreno A, Moreno L, Antela A, Perez-Elias MJ, Dronda F, Marín A, Hernandez-Ranz F, Moreno A, Moreno S. · Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. · Clin Infect Dis. · Pubmed #15712082 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a known risk factor for hepatotoxicity in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of HCV-related liver fibrosis in HAART-associated hepatotoxicity. METHODS: In a prospective study involving 107 patients who underwent liver biopsy, fibrosis was graded according 5 stages, from F0 (no fibrosis) to F4 (cirrhosis). Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase to >5 times the upper limit of normal, or a >3.5-fold increase if baseline levels were abnormal. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was compared with liver fibrosis stage and with time and composition of HAART. RESULTS: Overall, 27 patients (25%) had hepatotoxic events (5.1 events/100 person-years of therapy). The incidence was greater for patients with stage F3 or F4 fibrosis (38%) than for those with stage F1 or F2 fibrosis (15%; 7.6 vs. 3 events/100 person-years; relative risk, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.97; P=.013). Duration of HCV infection, duration of HAART, diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HCV load, HCV genotype, and nadir CD4(+) cell count did not affect the risk of hepatotoxicity. Of the 86 patients who received nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 11 (13%) developed liver toxicity. In these patients, fibrosis stages F1 and F2 were associated with similar rates of toxicity (3 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, 3.3 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz, and 3.4 events/100 person-years for those who received non-NNRTIs). There was a greater incidence among patients with F3 or F4 fibrosis who received NNRTIs (11.7 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, and 8.6 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz), compared with those who received non-NNRTIs (4 events/100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: HAART-associated hepatotoxicity correlates with liver histological stage in patients coinfected with HIV and HCV. There was no difference in hepatotoxicity risk for different antiretroviral therapies in patients with mild-to-moderate fibrosis.

Corral I, Quereda C, Antela A, Pintado V, Casado JL, Martín-Dávila P, Navas E, Moreno S. · Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. · J Neurovirol. · Pubmed #12587077 No free full text.

Abstract: Neurological complications caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) were diagnosed in 13 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in our hospital. There was a favorable influence of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the prevalence of these disorders among acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients: Since 1996, only 1 of 961 AIDS patients had VZV neurological disease, compared to 9 of 1088 patients before that year (P =.02). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected VZV DNA in cerebrospinal from 4 of 5 patients with VZV neurological disease, and from 2 of 130 HIV-infected patients with other neurological diseases (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.98 [95% confidence intervals 0.45-1 and 0.96-1, respectively], positive predictive value 0.94).

Dronda F, Pérez-Elías MJ, Antela A, Casado JL, Martí-Belda P, Cobo J. · Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #10682157 No free full text.

Abstract: Sequential use of antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors (PI) is frequently prescribed owing to failure or intolerance of the first selected agent. Controversial data exist about the virological and immunological outcome of patients in whom a change to a second PI regimen is needed. A prospective study of 113 HIV-positive patients (male, 84%; mean age 36 years; previous AIDS-defining event, 35%; previous antiretroviral therapy with nucleoside analogues, 94%) who started a saquinavir-containing regimen between March 1996 and March 1997 and had to change to indinavir (n = 79) owing to intolerance, failure or medical criteria was performed. At the time of the switch, median CD4 cell count was 221 cells/mm3 and the HIV RNA level was 3.98 log10 copies/ml. The rate of viral suppression (HIV RNA levels below 200 copies/ml) was 40% at 3 months and 28% at month 6 after indinavir was instituted. In a logistic regression analysis, only the baseline viral load [relative risk (RR), 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-6.05; P = 0.007] was statistically associated with the lack of viral suppression on indinavir. Although there are not sufficient data about the best therapeutic option if a change in PI-containing regimens therapy is considered, this study supports the recommendation of an early change of the PI-containing regimens, before the HIV-1 viral load reaches high levels.